Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Montreal Impact |
16 | 63% | 50% | 25% |
| 2 |
New York City |
16 | 56% | 38% | 13% |
| 3 |
New York RB |
16 | 81% | 56% | 44% |
| 4 |
Vancouver Whitecaps |
15 | 67% | 47% | 27% |
| 5 |
Houston Dynamo |
16 | 94% | 69% | 38% |
| 6 |
Chicago Fire |
14 | 57% | 29% | 21% |
| 7 |
Sporting KC |
15 | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 8 |
Columbus Crew |
16 | 38% | 38% | 19% |
| 9 |
LA Galaxy |
16 | 63% | 56% | 19% |
| 10 |
New England Revolution |
14 | 57% | 50% | 14% |
| 11 |
Colorado Rapids |
16 | 50% | 31% | 19% |
| 12 |
FC Dallas |
15 | 60% | 53% | 40% |
| 13 |
Real Salt Lake |
16 | 88% | 50% | 44% |
| 14 |
SJ Earthquakes |
16 | 63% | 38% | 13% |
| 15 |
Philadelphia Union |
16 | 63% | 63% | 44% |
| 16 |
Orlando City |
16 | 69% | 50% | 25% |
| 17 |
Seattle Sounders |
16 | 69% | 38% | 25% |
| 18 |
Toronto |
16 | 38% | 31% | 19% |
| 19 |
Portland Timbers |
16 | 69% | 50% | 19% |
| 20 |
Minnesota United |
16 | 31% | 13% | 6% |
| 21 |
Atlanta United FC |
16 | 63% | 38% | 13% |
| 22 |
Los Angeles FC |
15 | 60% | 60% | 27% |
| 23 |
FC Cincinnati |
16 | 44% | 19% | 13% |
| 24 |
DC United |
16 | 88% | 50% | 31% |
| 25 |
Inter Miami |
15 | 67% | 40% | 40% |
| 26 |
Nashville SC |
16 | 69% | 44% | 19% |
| 27 |
Austin |
16 | 75% | 50% | 31% |
| 28 |
Charlotte |
16 | 63% | 50% | 25% |
| 29 |
St. Louis City |
15 | 60% | 40% | 27% |
| 30 |
San Diego |
16 | 81% | 50% | 38% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Montreal Impact |
16 | 69% | 31% | 31% |
| 2 |
New York City |
16 | 56% | 31% | 6% |
| 3 |
New York RB |
16 | 81% | 56% | 13% |
| 4 |
Vancouver Whitecaps |
15 | 60% | 20% | 13% |
| 5 |
Houston Dynamo |
16 | 88% | 50% | 19% |
| 6 |
Chicago Fire |
14 | 71% | 43% | 29% |
| 7 |
Sporting KC |
15 | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 8 |
Columbus Crew |
16 | 44% | 13% | 6% |
| 9 |
LA Galaxy |
16 | 75% | 44% | 19% |
| 10 |
New England Revolution |
14 | 64% | 14% | 0% |
| 11 |
Colorado Rapids |
16 | 63% | 31% | 19% |
| 12 |
FC Dallas |
15 | 73% | 40% | 27% |
| 13 |
Real Salt Lake |
16 | 81% | 63% | 31% |
| 14 |
SJ Earthquakes |
16 | 63% | 25% | 13% |
| 15 |
Philadelphia Union |
16 | 81% | 56% | 25% |
| 16 |
Orlando City |
16 | 69% | 31% | 19% |
| 17 |
Seattle Sounders |
16 | 50% | 31% | 19% |
| 18 |
Toronto |
16 | 31% | 19% | 13% |
| 19 |
Portland Timbers |
16 | 75% | 38% | 19% |
| 20 |
Minnesota United |
16 | 50% | 6% | 6% |
| 21 |
Atlanta United FC |
16 | 63% | 38% | 0% |
| 22 |
Los Angeles FC |
15 | 53% | 33% | 13% |
| 23 |
FC Cincinnati |
16 | 69% | 38% | 0% |
| 24 |
DC United |
16 | 88% | 63% | 19% |
| 25 |
Inter Miami |
15 | 60% | 53% | 33% |
| 26 |
Nashville SC |
16 | 50% | 25% | 6% |
| 27 |
Austin |
16 | 63% | 38% | 19% |
| 28 |
Charlotte |
16 | 63% | 25% | 13% |
| 29 |
St. Louis City |
15 | 73% | 20% | 13% |
| 30 |
San Diego |
16 | 69% | 44% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Montreal Impact |
16 | 50% | 38% | 6% |
| 2 |
New York City |
16 | 69% | 25% | 13% |
| 3 |
New York RB |
16 | 69% | 44% | 19% |
| 4 |
Vancouver Whitecaps |
15 | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 5 |
Houston Dynamo |
16 | 81% | 56% | 31% |
| 6 |
Chicago Fire |
14 | 43% | 36% | 7% |
| 7 |
Sporting KC |
15 | 73% | 27% | 13% |
| 8 |
Columbus Crew |
16 | 56% | 31% | 19% |
| 9 |
LA Galaxy |
16 | 81% | 19% | 0% |
| 10 |
New England Revolution |
14 | 71% | 50% | 7% |
| 11 |
Colorado Rapids |
16 | 50% | 13% | 6% |
| 12 |
FC Dallas |
15 | 53% | 33% | 20% |
| 13 |
Real Salt Lake |
16 | 75% | 44% | 25% |
| 14 |
SJ Earthquakes |
16 | 63% | 19% | 19% |
| 15 |
Philadelphia Union |
16 | 69% | 38% | 25% |
| 16 |
Orlando City |
16 | 75% | 50% | 19% |
| 17 |
Seattle Sounders |
16 | 81% | 31% | 25% |
| 18 |
Toronto |
16 | 63% | 31% | 13% |
| 19 |
Portland Timbers |
16 | 63% | 31% | 13% |
| 20 |
Minnesota United |
16 | 44% | 13% | 0% |
| 21 |
Atlanta United FC |
16 | 63% | 31% | 13% |
| 22 |
Los Angeles FC |
15 | 87% | 47% | 20% |
| 23 |
FC Cincinnati |
16 | 31% | 25% | 0% |
| 24 |
DC United |
16 | 63% | 31% | 19% |
| 25 |
Inter Miami |
15 | 53% | 27% | 13% |
| 26 |
Nashville SC |
16 | 88% | 50% | 19% |
| 27 |
Austin |
16 | 56% | 44% | 19% |
| 28 |
Charlotte |
16 | 75% | 38% | 19% |
| 29 |
St. Louis City |
15 | 53% | 47% | 20% |
| 30 |
San Diego |
16 | 75% | 50% | 38% |
Check out all the card statistics for Montreal Impact vs FC Cincinnati here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Montreal Impact has played 16 matches in the MLS and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 69% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 31% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 31% of matches.
- Meanwhile, FC Cincinnati has, in 16 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 69% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 38% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
Card statistics for Montreal Impact vs FC Cincinnati bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the MLS, just check out the table above.