14.05.2022 - 20:00
Stadium : Romeo High School Stadium (Washington, Michigan)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Goal Scored | Avg. Overall | Avg. Home | Avg. Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chattanooga FC | 25 | 44 | 1.76 | 1.46 | 2.08 |
2 | ASC San Diego | 23 | 34 | 1.48 | 1.73 | 1.25 |
3 | Michigan Stars | 26 | 31 | 1.19 | 1.43 | 0.92 |
4 | LA Force | 20 | 14 | 0.7 | 0.55 | 0.89 |
5 | California Utd Strikers | 22 | 37 | 1.68 | 2.17 | 1.1 |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 24 | 32 | 1.33 | 2.08 | 0.58 |
7 | Bay Cities | 12 | 18 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
8 | Valley United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Syracuse Pulse | 23 | 26 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.08 |
10 | Flower City Union | 23 | 13 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
# | Team | MP | Goal Scored | Avg. Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chattanooga FC | 13 | 19 | 1.46 |
2 | ASC San Diego | 11 | 19 | 1.73 |
3 | Michigan Stars | 14 | 20 | 1.43 |
4 | LA Force | 11 | 6 | 0.55 |
5 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 26 | 2.17 |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 25 | 2.08 |
7 | Bay Cities | 4 | 6 | 1.5 |
8 | Valley United | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Syracuse Pulse | 11 | 13 | 1.18 |
10 | Flower City Union | 11 | 6 | 0.55 |
# | Team | MP | Goal Scored | Avg. Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chattanooga FC | 12 | 25 | 2.08 |
2 | ASC San Diego | 12 | 15 | 1.25 |
3 | Michigan Stars | 12 | 11 | 0.92 |
4 | LA Force | 9 | 8 | 0.89 |
5 | California Utd Strikers | 10 | 11 | 1.1 |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 7 | 0.58 |
7 | Bay Cities | 8 | 12 | 1.5 |
8 | Valley United | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Syracuse Pulse | 12 | 13 | 1.08 |
10 | Flower City Union | 12 | 7 | 0.58 |
# | Team | MP | Goals Conceded | Avg. Overall | Avg. Home | Avg. Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chattanooga FC | 25 | 22 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 1 |
2 | ASC San Diego | 23 | 26 | 1.13 | 0.91 | 1.33 |
3 | Michigan Stars | 26 | 15 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
4 | LA Force | 20 | 31 | 1.55 | 1 | 2.22 |
5 | California Utd Strikers | 22 | 16 | 0.73 | 1.08 | 0.3 |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 24 | 30 | 1.25 | 1.08 | 1.42 |
7 | Bay Cities | 12 | 18 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
8 | Valley United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Syracuse Pulse | 23 | 34 | 1.48 | 1 | 1.92 |
10 | Flower City Union | 23 | 57 | 2.48 | 2.45 | 2.5 |
# | Team | MP | Goals Conceded | Avg. Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chattanooga FC | 13 | 10 | 0.77 |
2 | ASC San Diego | 11 | 10 | 0.91 |
3 | Michigan Stars | 14 | 8 | 0.57 |
4 | LA Force | 11 | 11 | 1 |
5 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 13 | 1.08 |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 13 | 1.08 |
7 | Bay Cities | 4 | 6 | 1.5 |
8 | Valley United | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Syracuse Pulse | 11 | 11 | 1 |
10 | Flower City Union | 11 | 27 | 2.45 |
# | Team | MP | Goals Conceded | Avg. Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chattanooga FC | 12 | 12 | 1 |
2 | ASC San Diego | 12 | 16 | 1.33 |
3 | Michigan Stars | 12 | 7 | 0.58 |
4 | LA Force | 9 | 20 | 2.22 |
5 | California Utd Strikers | 10 | 3 | 0.3 |
6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 17 | 1.42 |
7 | Bay Cities | 8 | 12 | 1.5 |
8 | Valley United | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Syracuse Pulse | 12 | 23 | 1.92 |
10 | Flower City Union | 12 | 30 | 2.5 |
This section breaks down the goal statistics of Michigan Stars and Syracuse Pulse in the NISA. This information is crucial in better understanding how the two teams’ offences and defences have performed during the current campaign.
In terms of how Michigan Stars has performed with scoring and conceding goals in the NISA, here’s a quick summary:
For Syracuse Pulse, this is how many goals they have scored and conceded:
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.