Michigan Rangers 0 - 0 Erie Commodores
02.06.2024 - 19:00
Stadium: Davenport University Main Campus (Grand Rapids, Michigan)
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New Orleans Jesters |
10 | 30% | 20% | 20% |
| 2 |
FC Motown |
15 | 20% | 13% | 13% |
| 3 |
El Farolito |
17 | 35% | 35% | 24% |
| 4 |
Laredo Heat |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
| 5 |
West Chester United |
12 | 25% | 17% | 17% |
| 6 |
Duluth FC |
17 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 7 |
Erie Commodores |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Napa Valley 1839 FC |
14 | 21% | 14% | 7% |
| 9 |
FC Arizona |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 10 |
Hartford City FC |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 11 |
Sacramento Gold |
13 | 15% | 15% | 15% |
| 12 |
Hershey FC |
10 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Atlantic City FC |
10 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 14 |
Milwaukee Torrent |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| 15 |
Syracuse FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Fort Worth Vaqueros |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Demize NPSL |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Sioux Falls Thunder |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Electric City Shock |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% |
| 20 |
Naples United FC |
11 | 18% | 18% | 9% |
| 21 |
FC Frederick |
11 | 18% | 9% | 9% |
| 22 |
Kingston Stockade FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 |
Cleveland SC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 |
St. Louis Club Atletico |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 |
Minnesota Twin Stars FC |
13 | 23% | 8% | 0% |
| 26 |
FC Monmouth |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| 27 |
Virginia Beach City |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 |
FC Brownsville |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
Katy 1895 FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Dakota Fusion FC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 31 |
Jacksonville Armada II |
13 | 31% | 23% | 23% |
| 32 |
San Ramon FC |
13 | 15% | 8% | 0% |
| 33 |
Denton Diablos |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 34 |
GL Rough Diamonds |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 |
Las Vegas Legends FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
Tallahassee |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 37 |
Pensacola |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |
Arkansas Wolves |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 39 |
Oklahoma City 1889 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 |
Appalachian |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
New York Shockers |
13 | 15% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
First State |
10 | 20% | 10% | 10% |
| 43 |
Joy St. Louis Park |
13 | 23% | 8% | 8% |
| 44 |
Valeo |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
| 45 |
Miami Dutch Lions |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 46 |
Flower City Union |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 |
Oakland Stompers |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 |
Oakland SC |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 49 |
Brave Lions |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 50 |
Sunflower State |
10 | 30% | 30% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
FC Monmouth |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| 2 |
Virginia Beach City |
10 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
GL Rough Diamonds |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Miami Dutch Lions |
11 | 18% | 18% | 9% |
| 5 |
Erie Commodores |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Flower City Union |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
West Texas |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Jackson Lions |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
FC Arizona |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 10 |
Greenville United |
10 | 20% | 10% | 10% |
| 11 |
Fort Worth Vaqueros |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Sioux Falls Thunder |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 13 |
FC Frederick |
11 | 27% | 9% | 9% |
| 14 |
Kingston Stockade FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Dakota Fusion FC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Atlantic City FC |
10 | 20% | 10% | 0% |
| 17 |
Hershey FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
865 Alliance |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Charlottetowne Hops |
11 | 27% | 18% | 18% |
| 20 |
Annapolis Blues |
12 | 33% | 25% | 17% |
| 21 |
Pennsylvania Classics |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 |
Hartford City FC |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 23 |
Kansas City Sol |
11 | 36% | 27% | 9% |
| 24 |
Cleveland SC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 |
Valeo |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 |
Laredo Heat |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
| 27 |
Minnesota Twin Stars FC |
13 | 23% | 8% | 0% |
| 28 |
Austin United |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
Siouxland United |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
First State |
10 | 20% | 20% | 10% |
| 31 |
Las Vegas Legends FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 |
Katy 1895 FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 |
Virginia Dream |
13 | 54% | 31% | 31% |
| 34 |
West Chester United |
12 | 17% | 8% | 0% |
| 35 |
Minnesota Blizzard |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
Arkansas Wolves |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 37 |
Duluth FC |
17 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 38 |
Electric City Shock |
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% |
| 39 |
St. Louis Club Atletico |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 |
Jacksonville Armada II |
13 | 46% | 23% | 8% |
| 41 |
Denton Diablos |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
Alexandria Reds |
11 | 27% | 18% | 18% |
| 43 |
Grove Soccer United |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
| 44 |
Oklahoma City 1889 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 45 |
Joy St. Louis Park |
13 | 31% | 8% | 0% |
| 46 |
Lubbock Matadors |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 |
Akron City |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 |
Port City |
10 | 20% | 10% | 0% |
| 49 |
New Jersey United |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 50 |
Philadelphia Union III |
10 | 30% | 30% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New Orleans Jesters |
10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
FC Motown |
15 | 27% | 13% | 13% |
| 3 |
El Farolito |
17 | 29% | 24% | 18% |
| 4 |
Laredo Heat |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
West Chester United |
12 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
| 6 |
Duluth FC |
17 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Erie Commodores |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Napa Valley 1839 FC |
14 | 29% | 21% | 21% |
| 9 |
FC Arizona |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
| 10 |
Hartford City FC |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Sacramento Gold |
13 | 23% | 15% | 8% |
| 12 |
Hershey FC |
10 | 20% | 20% | 0% |
| 13 |
Atlantic City FC |
10 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 14 |
Milwaukee Torrent |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Syracuse FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Fort Worth Vaqueros |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Demize NPSL |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Sioux Falls Thunder |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Electric City Shock |
11 | 18% | 18% | 9% |
| 20 |
Naples United FC |
11 | 27% | 18% | 9% |
| 21 |
FC Frederick |
11 | 18% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 |
Kingston Stockade FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 |
Cleveland SC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 |
St. Louis Club Atletico |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
| 25 |
Minnesota Twin Stars FC |
13 | 23% | 8% | 0% |
| 26 |
FC Monmouth |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 |
Virginia Beach City |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 |
FC Brownsville |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
Katy 1895 FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Dakota Fusion FC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 31 |
Jacksonville Armada II |
13 | 38% | 31% | 23% |
| 32 |
San Ramon FC |
13 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 33 |
Denton Diablos |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 34 |
GL Rough Diamonds |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 |
Las Vegas Legends FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
Tallahassee |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 37 |
Pensacola |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |
Arkansas Wolves |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 39 |
Oklahoma City 1889 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 |
Appalachian |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
New York Shockers |
13 | 15% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
First State |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
| 43 |
Joy St. Louis Park |
13 | 15% | 8% | 8% |
| 44 |
Valeo |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
| 45 |
Miami Dutch Lions |
11 | 18% | 9% | 0% |
| 46 |
Flower City Union |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 |
Oakland Stompers |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 |
Oakland SC |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| 49 |
Brave Lions |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 50 |
Sunflower State |
10 | 30% | 30% | 10% |
Check out all the card statistics for Michigan Rangers vs Erie Commodores here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Michigan Rangers has played 11 matches in the NPSL and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 0% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 0% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Erie Commodores has, in 10 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 0% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 0% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
Card statistics for Michigan Rangers vs Erie Commodores bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the NPSL, just check out the table above.