22.08.2015 - 23:30
Stadium : Louisville Slugger Field (Louisville, Kentucky)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 4 | 14% |
2 | Penn FC | 28 | 9 | 32% |
3 | Toronto II | 28 | 5 | 18% |
4 | Tacoma Defiance | 29 | 7 | 24% |
5 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 28 | 4 | 14% |
6 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 29 | 5 | 17% |
7 | OKC Energy | 30 | 10 | 33% |
8 | LA Galaxy II | 32 | 11 | 34% |
9 | Sacramento Republic | 29 | 9 | 31% |
10 | Charleston Battery | 30 | 8 | 27% |
11 | Charlotte Independence | 28 | 7 | 25% |
12 | New York RB II | 30 | 6 | 20% |
13 | Colorado Springs | 30 | 11 | 37% |
14 | Louisville City | 30 | 9 | 30% |
15 | Real Monarchs | 28 | 4 | 14% |
16 | Saint Louis | 28 | 7 | 25% |
17 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 9 | 31% |
18 | Portland Timbers II | 28 | 4 | 14% |
19 | Orange County SC | 29 | 9 | 31% |
20 | Whitecaps II | 28 | 3 | 11% |
21 | Rochester Rhinos | 31 | 19 | 61% |
22 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 28 | 4 | 14% |
23 | FC Montréal | 28 | 7 | 25% |
24 | Austin Aztex FC | 28 | 7 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 2 | 14% |
2 | Penn FC | 14 | 5 | 36% |
3 | Toronto II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
4 | Tacoma Defiance | 14 | 5 | 36% |
5 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 14 | 0 | 0% |
6 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 3 | 21% |
7 | OKC Energy | 16 | 8 | 50% |
8 | LA Galaxy II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
9 | Sacramento Republic | 15 | 5 | 33% |
10 | Charleston Battery | 15 | 6 | 40% |
11 | Charlotte Independence | 14 | 4 | 29% |
12 | New York RB II | 15 | 2 | 13% |
13 | Colorado Springs | 15 | 7 | 47% |
14 | Louisville City | 15 | 8 | 53% |
15 | Real Monarchs | 14 | 3 | 21% |
16 | Saint Louis | 14 | 3 | 21% |
17 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 6 | 43% |
18 | Portland Timbers II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
19 | Orange County SC | 15 | 6 | 40% |
20 | Whitecaps II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
21 | Rochester Rhinos | 17 | 12 | 71% |
22 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 14 | 2 | 14% |
23 | FC Montréal | 14 | 2 | 14% |
24 | Austin Aztex FC | 14 | 4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 2 | 14% |
2 | Penn FC | 14 | 4 | 29% |
3 | Toronto II | 14 | 2 | 14% |
4 | Tacoma Defiance | 15 | 2 | 13% |
5 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 14 | 4 | 29% |
6 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 15 | 2 | 13% |
7 | OKC Energy | 14 | 2 | 14% |
8 | LA Galaxy II | 18 | 7 | 39% |
9 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 4 | 29% |
10 | Charleston Battery | 15 | 2 | 13% |
11 | Charlotte Independence | 14 | 3 | 21% |
12 | New York RB II | 15 | 4 | 27% |
13 | Colorado Springs | 15 | 4 | 27% |
14 | Louisville City | 15 | 1 | 7% |
15 | Real Monarchs | 14 | 1 | 7% |
16 | Saint Louis | 14 | 4 | 29% |
17 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 3 | 20% |
18 | Portland Timbers II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
19 | Orange County SC | 14 | 3 | 21% |
20 | Whitecaps II | 14 | 2 | 14% |
21 | Rochester Rhinos | 14 | 7 | 50% |
22 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 14 | 2 | 14% |
23 | FC Montréal | 14 | 5 | 36% |
24 | Austin Aztex FC | 14 | 3 | 21% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Louisville City vs Charleston Battery:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.