| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Najran |
30 | 17 | 57% |
| 2 |
Al Shoalah |
30 | 14 | 47% |
| 3 |
Al Najoom |
30 | 19 | 63% |
| 4 |
Al Draih |
32 | 14 | 44% |
| 5 |
Al Jeel |
30 | 20 | 67% |
| 6 |
Hottain |
30 | 14 | 47% |
| 7 |
Al Suqoor |
31 | 18 | 58% |
| 8 |
Al-Kawkab |
30 | 17 | 57% |
| 9 |
Al-Washm |
30 | 15 | 50% |
| 10 |
Al Ansar |
30 | 16 | 53% |
| 11 |
Al Zulfi |
32 | 18 | 56% |
| 12 |
Wajj |
30 | 16 | 53% |
| 13 |
Al Sahel |
30 | 17 | 57% |
| 14 |
Al Taqdom |
30 | 18 | 60% |
| 15 |
Al Jubail |
31 | 16 | 52% |
| 16 |
Arar |
30 | 14 | 47% |
| 17 |
Al-Sadd |
30 | 15 | 50% |
| 18 |
Afief |
30 | 21 | 70% |
| 19 |
Al Nairyah |
30 | 19 | 63% |
| 20 |
Al Entesar |
30 | 18 | 60% |
| 21 |
Al Rawdhah |
30 | 12 | 40% |
| 22 |
Tuwaiq |
30 | 13 | 43% |
| 23 |
Al-Lewaa |
30 | 11 | 37% |
| 24 |
Bisha |
30 | 20 | 67% |
| 25 |
Al-Saqer |
30 | 14 | 47% |
| 26 |
Al-Rayyan |
30 | 19 | 63% |
| 27 |
Jerash FC |
30 | 16 | 53% |
| 28 |
Al Qous |
30 | 11 | 37% |
| 29 |
Al Shuaib |
30 | 13 | 43% |
| 30 |
Mudhar |
30 | 17 | 57% |
| 31 |
Al-Noor |
30 | 18 | 60% |
| 32 |
Alhowra |
30 | 20 | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Najran |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 2 |
Al Shoalah |
15 | 6 | 40% |
| 3 |
Al Najoom |
15 | 12 | 80% |
| 4 |
Al Draih |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 5 |
Al Jeel |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 6 |
Hottain |
15 | 4 | 27% |
| 7 |
Al Suqoor |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 8 |
Al-Kawkab |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 9 |
Al-Washm |
15 | 6 | 40% |
| 10 |
Al Ansar |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 11 |
Al Zulfi |
16 | 11 | 69% |
| 12 |
Wajj |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 13 |
Al Sahel |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 14 |
Al Taqdom |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 15 |
Al Jubail |
15 | 5 | 33% |
| 16 |
Arar |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 17 |
Al-Sadd |
15 | 11 | 73% |
| 18 |
Afief |
15 | 11 | 73% |
| 19 |
Al Nairyah |
15 | 12 | 80% |
| 20 |
Al Entesar |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 21 |
Al Rawdhah |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 22 |
Tuwaiq |
15 | 6 | 40% |
| 23 |
Al-Lewaa |
15 | 4 | 27% |
| 24 |
Bisha |
15 | 11 | 73% |
| 25 |
Al-Saqer |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 26 |
Al-Rayyan |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 27 |
Jerash FC |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 28 |
Al Qous |
15 | 6 | 40% |
| 29 |
Al Shuaib |
15 | 6 | 40% |
| 30 |
Mudhar |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 31 |
Al-Noor |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 32 |
Alhowra |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Najran |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 2 |
Al Shoalah |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 3 |
Al Najoom |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 4 |
Al Draih |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 5 |
Al Jeel |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 6 |
Hottain |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 7 |
Al Suqoor |
15 | 12 | 80% |
| 8 |
Al-Kawkab |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 9 |
Al-Washm |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 10 |
Al Ansar |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 11 |
Al Zulfi |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 12 |
Wajj |
15 | 8 | 53% |
| 13 |
Al Sahel |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 14 |
Al Taqdom |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 15 |
Al Jubail |
16 | 11 | 69% |
| 16 |
Arar |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 17 |
Al-Sadd |
15 | 4 | 27% |
| 18 |
Afief |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 19 |
Al Nairyah |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 20 |
Al Entesar |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 21 |
Al Rawdhah |
15 | 4 | 27% |
| 22 |
Tuwaiq |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 23 |
Al-Lewaa |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 24 |
Bisha |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 25 |
Al-Saqer |
15 | 5 | 33% |
| 26 |
Al-Rayyan |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 27 |
Jerash FC |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 28 |
Al Qous |
15 | 5 | 33% |
| 29 |
Al Shuaib |
15 | 7 | 47% |
| 30 |
Mudhar |
15 | 9 | 60% |
| 31 |
Al-Noor |
15 | 10 | 67% |
| 32 |
Alhowra |
15 | 10 | 67% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Jerash FC and Al-Saqer have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Second Division.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.