Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
12 | 10 | 83% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
13 | 8 | 62% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
13 | 8 | 62% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
13 | 10 | 77% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
13 | 8 | 62% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
13 | 8 | 62% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
8 | 7 | 88% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
5 | 5 | 100% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
6 | 6 | 100% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
7 | 6 | 86% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
7 | 5 | 71% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Henan Jianye and Shanghai SIPG have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Chinese Super League.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 12 matches played in the Chinese Super League, Henan Jianye has scored and conceded goals in 8 matches. In other words, 67% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 100% at home, while it is 43% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Shanghai SIPG has scored and conceded in 10 of their 12 matches so far in the Chinese Super League, giving them a BTTS rate of 83%. Both teams have scored in 7 of Shanghai SIPG’s 8 home matches, and it has happened 3 times in 4 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets