Guangzhou R&F 0 - 5 Wuhan Zall
13.08.2022 - 07:30
Stadium: Yuexiushan Stadium
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 16 | 48% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 16 | 48% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 13 | 39% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 16 | 48% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 16 | 48% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 20 | 61% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 13 | 39% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 18 | 55% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 15 | 45% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 14 | 42% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 18 | 55% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 15 | 45% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 20 | 61% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 14 | 42% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 18 | 55% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 14 | 42% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 17 | 52% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 15 | 45% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 12 | 71% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 10 | 63% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 11 | 69% |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 10 | 63% |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 6 | 35% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Guangzhou R&F and Wuhan Zall have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Chinese Super League.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 33 matches played in the Chinese Super League, Guangzhou R&F has scored and conceded goals in 14 matches. In other words, 42% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 50% at home, while it is 35% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Wuhan Zall has scored and conceded in 18 of their 33 matches so far in the Chinese Super League, giving them a BTTS rate of 55%. Both teams have scored in 11 of Wuhan Zall’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 7 times in 16 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets