28.10.2022 - 03:00
Finished
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Qingdao Jonoon | 34 | 76% |
2 | Kunshan | 34 | 76% |
3 | Nantong Zhiyun | 34 | 74% |
4 | Suzhou Dongwu | 34 | 56% |
5 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 34 | 56% |
6 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 34 | 50% |
7 | Hebei Kungfu | 34 | 50% |
8 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 34 | 47% |
9 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 34 | 44% |
10 | Shenyang Urban | 34 | 44% |
11 | Shanghai Jiading | 34 | 41% |
12 | Qingdao Youth Island | 34 | 41% |
13 | Nanjing City | 34 | 38% |
14 | Zibo Cuju | 34 | 38% |
15 | Guangxi Baoyun | 34 | 32% |
16 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 34 | 29% |
17 | Beijing BG | 34 | 21% |
18 | BIT | 34 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kunshan | 17 | 71% |
2 | Qingdao Jonoon | 17 | 71% |
3 | Nantong Zhiyun | 17 | 65% |
4 | Suzhou Dongwu | 17 | 65% |
5 | Hebei Kungfu | 17 | 59% |
6 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 17 | 53% |
7 | Shanghai Jiading | 17 | 53% |
8 | Qingdao Youth Island | 17 | 47% |
9 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 41% |
10 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 17 | 41% |
11 | Zibo Cuju | 17 | 41% |
12 | Shenyang Urban | 17 | 41% |
13 | Guangxi Baoyun | 17 | 35% |
14 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 35% |
15 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 35% |
16 | Nanjing City | 17 | 24% |
17 | Beijing BG | 17 | 24% |
18 | BIT | 17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kunshan | 17 | 82% |
2 | Nantong Zhiyun | 17 | 82% |
3 | Qingdao Jonoon | 17 | 82% |
4 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 59% |
5 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 17 | 59% |
6 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 17 | 59% |
7 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 53% |
8 | Nanjing City | 17 | 53% |
9 | Suzhou Dongwu | 17 | 47% |
10 | Shenyang Urban | 17 | 47% |
11 | Hebei Kungfu | 17 | 41% |
12 | Qingdao Youth Island | 17 | 35% |
13 | Zibo Cuju | 17 | 35% |
14 | Shanghai Jiading | 17 | 29% |
15 | Guangxi Baoyun | 17 | 29% |
16 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 18% |
17 | Beijing BG | 17 | 18% |
18 | BIT | 17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | BIT | 34 | 82% |
2 | Beijing BG | 34 | 76% |
3 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 34 | 71% |
4 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 34 | 53% |
5 | Zibo Cuju | 34 | 50% |
6 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 34 | 50% |
7 | Shenyang Urban | 34 | 50% |
8 | Shanghai Jiading | 34 | 50% |
9 | Qingdao Youth Island | 34 | 47% |
10 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 34 | 47% |
11 | Nanjing City | 34 | 44% |
12 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 34 | 44% |
13 | Guangxi Baoyun | 34 | 41% |
14 | Hebei Kungfu | 34 | 38% |
15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 34 | 29% |
16 | Qingdao Jonoon | 34 | 21% |
17 | Kunshan | 34 | 18% |
18 | Nantong Zhiyun | 34 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | BIT | 17 | 82% |
2 | Beijing BG | 17 | 76% |
3 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 65% |
4 | Nanjing City | 17 | 65% |
5 | Shenyang Urban | 17 | 59% |
6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 59% |
7 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 17 | 53% |
8 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 53% |
9 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 17 | 47% |
10 | Qingdao Youth Island | 17 | 47% |
11 | Zibo Cuju | 17 | 41% |
12 | Shanghai Jiading | 17 | 35% |
13 | Guangxi Baoyun | 17 | 35% |
14 | Qingdao Jonoon | 17 | 29% |
15 | Hebei Kungfu | 17 | 29% |
16 | Suzhou Dongwu | 17 | 24% |
17 | Kunshan | 17 | 24% |
18 | Nantong Zhiyun | 17 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 82% |
2 | BIT | 17 | 82% |
3 | Beijing BG | 17 | 76% |
4 | Shanghai Jiading | 17 | 65% |
5 | Zibo Cuju | 17 | 59% |
6 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 47% |
7 | Guangxi Baoyun | 17 | 47% |
8 | Hebei Kungfu | 17 | 47% |
9 | Qingdao Youth Island | 17 | 47% |
10 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 17 | 41% |
11 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 41% |
12 | Shenyang Urban | 17 | 41% |
13 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 17 | 41% |
14 | Suzhou Dongwu | 17 | 35% |
15 | Nanjing City | 17 | 24% |
16 | Kunshan | 17 | 12% |
17 | Nantong Zhiyun | 17 | 12% |
18 | Qingdao Jonoon | 17 | 12% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Guangxi Baoyun and Qingdao Youth Island in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Guangxi Baoyun has come out and scored the first goal in 32% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 41% of matches.
Meanwhile, Qingdao Youth Island comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 41% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 47% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.