25.09.2022 - 00:00
Stadium : Breese Stevens Field (Madison, Wisconsin)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 33 | 64% |
2 | Northern Colorado | 30 | 53% |
3 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 33 | 52% |
4 | Greenville Triumph | 31 | 52% |
5 | Union Omaha | 31 | 48% |
6 | Charlotte Independence | 31 | 48% |
7 | Richmond Kickers | 31 | 45% |
8 | Central Valley Fuego | 30 | 43% |
9 | FC Tucson | 30 | 40% |
10 | North Carolina FC | 30 | 40% |
11 | Forward Madison | 30 | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Greenville Triumph | 16 | 56% |
2 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 17 | 53% |
3 | Union Omaha | 15 | 53% |
4 | North Carolina FC | 15 | 53% |
5 | Charlotte Independence | 15 | 53% |
6 | Northern Colorado | 15 | 53% |
7 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 16 | 50% |
8 | Richmond Kickers | 16 | 44% |
9 | FC Tucson | 15 | 40% |
10 | Central Valley Fuego | 15 | 33% |
11 | Forward Madison | 15 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 16 | 75% |
2 | Central Valley Fuego | 15 | 53% |
3 | Northern Colorado | 15 | 53% |
4 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 17 | 53% |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 47% |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 47% |
7 | Charlotte Independence | 16 | 44% |
8 | Union Omaha | 16 | 44% |
9 | Forward Madison | 15 | 40% |
10 | FC Tucson | 15 | 40% |
11 | North Carolina FC | 15 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Forward Madison | 30 | 60% |
2 | FC Tucson | 30 | 57% |
3 | North Carolina FC | 30 | 57% |
4 | Richmond Kickers | 31 | 55% |
5 | Central Valley Fuego | 30 | 53% |
6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 33 | 45% |
7 | Greenville Triumph | 31 | 45% |
8 | Charlotte Independence | 31 | 42% |
9 | Northern Colorado | 30 | 40% |
10 | Union Omaha | 31 | 35% |
11 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 33 | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Forward Madison | 15 | 67% |
2 | FC Tucson | 15 | 60% |
3 | Central Valley Fuego | 15 | 60% |
4 | Richmond Kickers | 16 | 56% |
5 | Northern Colorado | 15 | 47% |
6 | North Carolina FC | 15 | 47% |
7 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 16 | 44% |
8 | Charlotte Independence | 15 | 40% |
9 | Greenville Triumph | 16 | 38% |
10 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 17 | 35% |
11 | Union Omaha | 15 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 15 | 67% |
2 | FC Tucson | 15 | 53% |
3 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 53% |
4 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 53% |
5 | Forward Madison | 15 | 53% |
6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 17 | 47% |
7 | Central Valley Fuego | 15 | 47% |
8 | Charlotte Independence | 16 | 44% |
9 | Union Omaha | 16 | 38% |
10 | Northern Colorado | 15 | 33% |
11 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 16 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Forward Madison and South Georgia Tormenta FC in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Forward Madison has come out and scored the first goal in 30% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 60% of matches.
Meanwhile, South Georgia Tormenta FC comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 64% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 30% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.