FC Tucson 5 - 0 Colorado Switchbacks II
08.06.2018 - 22:30
Stadium: Kino North Stadium
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Black Rock FC |
15 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Brazos Valley |
15 | 20% | 7% | 7% |
| 3 |
Lakeland Tropics SC |
14 | 43% | 36% | 36% |
| 4 |
West Virginia Chaos |
14 | 21% | 21% | 14% |
| 5 |
Colorado Rapids II |
15 | 20% | 7% | 0% |
| 6 |
Myrtle Beach Mutiny |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 36% | 29% | 29% |
| 8 |
Mississippi Brilla |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 10 |
Thunder Bay Chill |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Cincinnati Dutch Lions |
13 | 31% | 23% | 23% |
| 12 |
Chicago FC United |
17 | 18% | 12% | 6% |
| 13 |
Reading United |
18 | 11% | 6% | 6% |
| 14 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| 15 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
14 | 36% | 36% | 29% |
| 16 |
Des Moines Menace |
16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Derby City Rovers |
14 | 21% | 21% | 14% |
| 18 |
Charlotte Eagles |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Tobacco Road FC |
14 | 21% | 14% | 7% |
| 20 |
North County United |
14 | 50% | 36% | 21% |
| 21 |
Houston FC |
14 | 50% | 43% | 36% |
| 22 |
FC Cleburne |
14 | 21% | 14% | 14% |
| 23 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 36% | 21% | 7% |
| 24 |
Orange County SC II |
14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
| 25 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 19% | 13% | 6% |
| 26 |
SIMA Águilas |
16 | 44% | 25% | 19% |
| 27 |
Weston FC |
13 | 46% | 38% | 23% |
| 28 |
Santa Cruz Breakers |
14 | 21% | 14% | 0% |
| 29 |
WSA Winnipeg |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Portland Timbers III |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 31 |
SF Glens |
14 | 21% | 7% | 0% |
| 32 |
Colorado Switchbacks II |
14 | 29% | 29% | 21% |
| 33 |
Ogden City |
14 | 43% | 14% | 7% |
| 34 |
Lionsbridge |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 35 |
Kaw Valley |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
AHFC Royals |
14 | 43% | 36% | 29% |
| 37 |
Corpus Christi |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 38 |
New York Magic - FA Euro |
14 | 57% | 36% | 21% |
| 39 |
Calgary Foothills |
18 | 22% | 11% | 11% |
| 40 |
Birmingham Hammers |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
Memphis FC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 64% | 57% | 36% |
| 43 |
Michigan Bucks |
13 | 31% | 23% | 23% |
| 44 |
Evergreen |
14 | 29% | 14% | 14% |
| 45 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 50% | 36% | 21% |
| 46 |
Lansing United |
15 | 33% | 27% | 27% |
| 47 |
St. Louis Lions |
14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
| 48 |
Dayton Dutch Lions |
15 | 33% | 27% | 27% |
| 49 |
Portland Phoenix |
14 | 43% | 14% | 14% |
| 50 |
TSS Rovers |
14 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Black Rock FC |
15 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Brazos Valley |
15 | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Lakeland Tropics SC |
14 | 50% | 21% | 7% |
| 4 |
West Virginia Chaos |
14 | 29% | 21% | 14% |
| 5 |
Colorado Rapids II |
15 | 33% | 7% | 0% |
| 6 |
Myrtle Beach Mutiny |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 36% | 21% | 21% |
| 8 |
Mississippi Brilla |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
| 10 |
Thunder Bay Chill |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Cincinnati Dutch Lions |
13 | 23% | 23% | 15% |
| 12 |
Chicago FC United |
17 | 18% | 12% | 6% |
| 13 |
Reading United |
18 | 11% | 6% | 6% |
| 14 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 14% | 14% | 0% |
| 15 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
14 | 36% | 36% | 36% |
| 16 |
Des Moines Menace |
16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Derby City Rovers |
14 | 36% | 21% | 14% |
| 18 |
Charlotte Eagles |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Tobacco Road FC |
14 | 29% | 7% | 7% |
| 20 |
North County United |
14 | 50% | 36% | 21% |
| 21 |
Houston FC |
14 | 50% | 21% | 14% |
| 22 |
FC Cleburne |
14 | 43% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 36% | 7% | 7% |
| 24 |
Orange County SC II |
14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
| 25 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 25% | 6% | 0% |
| 26 |
SIMA Águilas |
16 | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 27 |
Weston FC |
13 | 62% | 38% | 23% |
| 28 |
Santa Cruz Breakers |
14 | 36% | 21% | 0% |
| 29 |
WSA Winnipeg |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Portland Timbers III |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 31 |
SF Glens |
14 | 21% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 |
Colorado Switchbacks II |
14 | 29% | 29% | 21% |
| 33 |
Ogden City |
14 | 36% | 7% | 0% |
| 34 |
Lionsbridge |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 |
Kaw Valley |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
AHFC Royals |
14 | 50% | 29% | 21% |
| 37 |
Corpus Christi |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 38 |
New York Magic - FA Euro |
14 | 50% | 29% | 29% |
| 39 |
Calgary Foothills |
18 | 17% | 11% | 0% |
| 40 |
Birmingham Hammers |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
Memphis FC |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 42 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 57% | 50% | 29% |
| 43 |
Michigan Bucks |
13 | 23% | 8% | 8% |
| 44 |
Evergreen |
14 | 29% | 21% | 7% |
| 45 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 43% | 7% | 0% |
| 46 |
Lansing United |
15 | 33% | 20% | 13% |
| 47 |
St. Louis Lions |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 48 |
Dayton Dutch Lions |
15 | 40% | 20% | 13% |
| 49 |
Portland Phoenix |
14 | 43% | 7% | 7% |
| 50 |
TSS Rovers |
14 | 36% | 29% | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Black Rock FC |
15 | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Brazos Valley |
15 | 27% | 20% | 7% |
| 3 |
Lakeland Tropics SC |
14 | 57% | 36% | 36% |
| 4 |
West Virginia Chaos |
14 | 21% | 21% | 14% |
| 5 |
Colorado Rapids II |
15 | 20% | 7% | 7% |
| 6 |
Myrtle Beach Mutiny |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 43% | 29% | 21% |
| 8 |
Mississippi Brilla |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 10 |
Thunder Bay Chill |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Cincinnati Dutch Lions |
13 | 46% | 15% | 8% |
| 12 |
Chicago FC United |
17 | 12% | 6% | 0% |
| 13 |
Reading United |
18 | 11% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 21% | 14% | 14% |
| 15 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
14 | 29% | 14% | 0% |
| 16 |
Des Moines Menace |
16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Derby City Rovers |
14 | 21% | 14% | 0% |
| 18 |
Charlotte Eagles |
14 | 21% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Tobacco Road FC |
14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
| 20 |
North County United |
14 | 36% | 21% | 7% |
| 21 |
Houston FC |
14 | 64% | 29% | 14% |
| 22 |
FC Cleburne |
14 | 36% | 14% | 14% |
| 23 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 50% | 21% | 0% |
| 24 |
Orange County SC II |
14 | 21% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 19% | 13% | 0% |
| 26 |
SIMA Águilas |
16 | 44% | 25% | 19% |
| 27 |
Weston FC |
13 | 38% | 23% | 8% |
| 28 |
Santa Cruz Breakers |
14 | 29% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
WSA Winnipeg |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Portland Timbers III |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 31 |
SF Glens |
14 | 21% | 7% | 0% |
| 32 |
Colorado Switchbacks II |
14 | 21% | 7% | 0% |
| 33 |
Ogden City |
14 | 50% | 14% | 7% |
| 34 |
Lionsbridge |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 35 |
Kaw Valley |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
AHFC Royals |
14 | 43% | 14% | 7% |
| 37 |
Corpus Christi |
14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |
New York Magic - FA Euro |
14 | 57% | 29% | 7% |
| 39 |
Calgary Foothills |
18 | 22% | 17% | 11% |
| 40 |
Birmingham Hammers |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
Memphis FC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 50% | 36% | 29% |
| 43 |
Michigan Bucks |
13 | 31% | 23% | 23% |
| 44 |
Evergreen |
14 | 21% | 14% | 0% |
| 45 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 50% | 36% | 36% |
| 46 |
Lansing United |
15 | 27% | 13% | 13% |
| 47 |
St. Louis Lions |
14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
| 48 |
Dayton Dutch Lions |
15 | 40% | 27% | 20% |
| 49 |
Portland Phoenix |
14 | 50% | 14% | 14% |
| 50 |
TSS Rovers |
14 | 21% | 7% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for FC Tucson vs Colorado Switchbacks II here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- FC Tucson has played 16 matches in the PDL and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 25% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 6% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Colorado Switchbacks II has, in 14 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 29% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 29% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 21% of matches.
Card statistics for FC Tucson vs Colorado Switchbacks II bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the PDL, just check out the table above.