# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chiapas |
25 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Cafetaleros de Tapachula |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Irapuato |
42 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Estudiantes Tecos |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Gavilanes FC Matamoros |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Inter Playa del Carmen |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Leones Negros UdeG Premier |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() UA Zacatecas |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Pioneros de Cancún |
29 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Durango |
34 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Mineros de Fresnillo |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Reboceros La Piedad |
27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Zitacuaro |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Correcaminos UAT II |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Sporting Canamy |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Chiapas Premier |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Aguacateros CDU |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Colima |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Tritons Vallarta |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Lobos ULMX |
32 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Montañeses |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Deportivo Zap |
29 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Los Cabos United |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Mexicali FC |
28 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Deportiva Venados |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() Chilpancingo |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Faraones Texcoco |
27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() San Juan de Aragón |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Aguacateros de Peribán |
40 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Acatlán |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Tigres de Álica |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Real Apodaca |
32 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Racing Porto Palmeiras |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Petroleros de Salamanca |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Agricultores |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Zacatepec |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chiapas |
25 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Cafetaleros de Tapachula |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Irapuato |
42 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Estudiantes Tecos |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Gavilanes FC Matamoros |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Inter Playa del Carmen |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Leones Negros UdeG Premier |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() UA Zacatecas |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Pioneros de Cancún |
29 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Durango |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
13 |
![]() Mineros de Fresnillo |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Reboceros La Piedad |
27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Zitacuaro |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Correcaminos UAT II |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Sporting Canamy |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Chiapas Premier |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Aguacateros CDU |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Colima |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Tritons Vallarta |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Lobos ULMX |
32 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Montañeses |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Deportivo Zap |
29 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Los Cabos United |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Mexicali FC |
28 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Deportiva Venados |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() Chilpancingo |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Faraones Texcoco |
27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() San Juan de Aragón |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Aguacateros de Peribán |
40 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Acatlán |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Tigres de Álica |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Real Apodaca |
32 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Racing Porto Palmeiras |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Petroleros de Salamanca |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Agricultores |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Zacatepec |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chiapas |
25 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Cafetaleros de Tapachula |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Irapuato |
42 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Estudiantes Tecos |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Gavilanes FC Matamoros |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Inter Playa del Carmen |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Leones Negros UdeG Premier |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() UA Zacatecas |
30 | 10% | 3% | 3% |
11 |
![]() Pioneros de Cancún |
29 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Durango |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Mineros de Fresnillo |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Reboceros La Piedad |
27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Zitacuaro |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Correcaminos UAT II |
36 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Sporting Canamy |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Chiapas Premier |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Aguacateros CDU |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Colima |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Tritons Vallarta |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Lobos ULMX |
32 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Montañeses |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Deportivo Zap |
29 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Los Cabos United |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Mexicali FC |
28 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Deportiva Venados |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() Chilpancingo |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Faraones Texcoco |
27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() San Juan de Aragón |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Aguacateros de Peribán |
40 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Acatlán |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Tigres de Álica |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Real Apodaca |
32 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Racing Porto Palmeiras |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Petroleros de Salamanca |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Agricultores |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Zacatepec |
28 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Faraones Texcoco vs Chilpancingo here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Faraones Texcoco vs Chilpancingo bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Liga Premier Serie A, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.