# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
17 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
14 | 61% |
4 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
14 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
13 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
13 | 54% |
7 |
![]() Nanjing City |
12 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
11 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
11 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
10 | 43% |
11 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
10 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
9 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
9 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
8 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
8 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
5 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
10 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
8 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
8 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
8 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
8 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Nanjing City |
6 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 45% |
11 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
5 | 42% |
12 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
4 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
4 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
3 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
9 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
6 | 55% |
5 |
![]() Nanjing City |
6 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
6 | 46% |
8 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 42% |
10 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 42% |
12 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
2 | 18% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 15% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
1 | 8% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
20 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
16 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
15 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
15 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
15 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
14 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
14 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
13 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Nanjing City |
12 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
11 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
11 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
11 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
9 | 39% |
15 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
8 | 32% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
7 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
9 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
8 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
8 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
8 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
6 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
7 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Nanjing City |
6 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
5 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
4 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
4 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
3 | 23% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
11 | 91% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
11 | 84% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
9 | 81% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
8 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Dongguan United |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
7 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
7 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 30% |
15 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
3 | 25% |
16 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
3 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Dongguan United and Guangzhou E-Power in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Dongguan United has come out and scored the first goal in 44% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 56% of matches.
Meanwhile, Guangzhou E-Power comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 54% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 45% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.