# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
19 | 70% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
15 | 58% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
15 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
15 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
15 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
14 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
12 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 46% |
11 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
12 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 44% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 42% |
16 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 41% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 41% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
10 | 37% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 30% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Louisville City |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 54% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 54% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 8% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
19 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
19 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
17 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 61% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
17 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
16 | 59% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
16 | 59% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
15 | 57% |
10 |
![]() San Antonio |
15 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
15 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
15 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
14 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
14 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
13 | 52% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 48% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
12 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
11 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
10 | 38% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
10 | 37% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
4 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 91% |
2 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() San Antonio |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 58% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 53% |
18 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 46% |
20 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 41% |
23 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Detroit City FC and Lexington in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Detroit City FC has come out and scored the first goal in 44% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 55% of matches.
Meanwhile, Lexington comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 41% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 59% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.