Dandenong Thunder vs St. Albans Saints Card Stats

#	Team	MP	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5
1	South Melbourne	18	61%	56%	44%
2	Green Gully	18	78%	56%	50%
3	Oakleigh Cannons	18	78%	61%	50%
4	Heidelberg United	18	72%	50%	33%
5	Port Melbourne	18	78%	72%	50%
6	Bentleigh Greens	18	72%	39%	22%
7	Hume City	18	50%	39%	17%
8	Melbourne Knights	18	78%	56%	33%
9	Dandenong Thunder	18	83%	78%	61%
10	Avondale	18	83%	72%	61%
11	St. Albans Saints	18	67%	61%	44%
12	Dandenong City	18	56%	44%	22%
13	Altona Magic	18	78%	61%	50%
14	Eastern Lions	18	78%	67%	39%

Team

Over 3.5

Over 4.5

Over 5.5

South Melbourne

61%

56%

44%

Green Gully

78%

56%

50%

Oakleigh Cannons

78%

61%

50%

Heidelberg United

72%

50%

33%

Port Melbourne

78%

72%

50%

Bentleigh Greens

72%

39%

22%

Hume City

50%

39%

17%

Melbourne Knights

78%

56%

33%

Dandenong Thunder

83%

78%

61%

Avondale

83%

72%

61%

St. Albans Saints

67%

61%

44%

Dandenong City

56%

44%

22%

Altona Magic

78%

61%

50%

Eastern Lions

78%

67%

39%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Over 2.5	Over 3.5
1	South Melbourne	18	56%	39%	17%
2	Green Gully	18	78%	56%	33%
3	Oakleigh Cannons	18	78%	39%	22%
4	Heidelberg United	18	78%	33%	22%
5	Port Melbourne	18	89%	61%	39%
6	Bentleigh Greens	18	72%	33%	11%
7	Hume City	18	56%	33%	17%
8	Melbourne Knights	18	72%	28%	17%
9	Dandenong Thunder	18	72%	56%	28%
10	Avondale	18	78%	50%	22%
11	St. Albans Saints	18	78%	56%	33%
12	Dandenong City	18	61%	39%	39%
13	Altona Magic	18	89%	44%	28%
14	Eastern Lions	18	61%	39%	28%

Team

Over 1.5

Over 2.5

Over 3.5

South Melbourne

56%

39%

17%

Green Gully

78%

56%

33%

Oakleigh Cannons

78%

39%

22%

Heidelberg United

78%

33%

22%

Port Melbourne

89%

61%

39%

Bentleigh Greens

72%

33%

11%

Hume City

56%

33%

17%

Melbourne Knights

72%

28%

17%

Dandenong Thunder

72%

56%

28%

Avondale

78%

50%

22%

St. Albans Saints

78%

56%

33%

Dandenong City

61%

39%

Altona Magic

89%

44%

28%

Eastern Lions

61%

39%

28%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Over 2.5	Over 3.5
1	South Melbourne	18	72%	44%	28%
2	Green Gully	18	78%	44%	6%
3	Oakleigh Cannons	18	67%	50%	33%
4	Heidelberg United	18	67%	39%	28%
5	Port Melbourne	18	56%	44%	22%
6	Bentleigh Greens	18	78%	39%	11%
7	Hume City	18	61%	28%	6%
8	Melbourne Knights	18	83%	56%	33%
9	Dandenong Thunder	18	83%	61%	44%
10	Avondale	18	89%	72%	56%
11	St. Albans Saints	18	67%	33%	28%
12	Dandenong City	18	56%	11%	6%
13	Altona Magic	18	72%	28%	28%
14	Eastern Lions	18	89%	56%	28%

Team

Over 1.5

Over 2.5

Over 3.5

South Melbourne

72%

44%

28%

Green Gully

78%

44%

Oakleigh Cannons

67%

50%

33%

Heidelberg United

67%

39%

28%

Port Melbourne

56%

44%

22%

Bentleigh Greens

78%

39%

11%

Hume City

61%

28%

Melbourne Knights

83%

56%

33%

Dandenong Thunder

83%

61%

44%

Avondale

89%

72%

56%

St. Albans Saints

67%

33%

28%

Dandenong City

56%

11%

Altona Magic

72%

28%

Eastern Lions

89%

56%

28%

Check out all the card statistics for Dandenong Thunder vs St. Albans Saints here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.

For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:

Dandenong Thunder has played 18 matches in the Victoria NPL and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 72% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 56% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 28% of matches.
Meanwhile, St. Albans Saints has, in 18 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 78% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 56% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 33% of matches.

Card statistics for Dandenong Thunder vs St. Albans Saints bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.

And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Victoria NPL, just check out the table above.

Dandenong Thunder 1 - 0 St. Albans Saints

Cards