Dandenong Thunder 1 - 1 Dandenong City
06.07.2019 - 05:00
Stadium: George Andrews Reserve
Finished
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 14 | 54% | 38% | 69% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 16 | 59% | 57% | 62% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 14 | 50% | 64% | 36% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 15 | 56% | 43% | 69% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 17 | 65% | 69% | 62% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 14 | 54% | 54% | 54% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 20 | 69% | 85% | 56% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 15 | 56% | 62% | 50% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 14 | 54% | 46% | 62% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 21 | 81% | 77% | 85% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 18 | 64% | 73% | 54% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 15 | 58% | 54% | 62% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 15 | 58% | 54% | 62% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 20 | 77% | 77% | 77% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 25 | 96% | 100% | 92% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 26 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 26 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 26 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 25 | 96% | 92% | 100% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 28 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 27 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 26 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 26 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 26 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 25 | 96% | 100% | 92% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 25 | 96% | 100% | 92% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 26 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 21 | 81% | 85% | 77% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 22 | 81% | 79% | 85% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 22 | 79% | 86% | 71% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 22 | 81% | 93% | 69% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 21 | 81% | 85% | 77% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 20 | 77% | 77% | 77% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 26 | 90% | 92% | 88% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 23 | 85% | 85% | 86% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 23 | 88% | 77% | 100% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 26 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 25 | 89% | 80% | 100% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 23 | 88% | 85% | 92% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 21 | 81% | 85% | 77% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 23 | 88% | 85% | 92% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 7 | 27% | 8% | 46% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 13 | 48% | 57% | 38% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 8 | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 9 | 33% | 29% | 38% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 12 | 46% | 62% | 31% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 8 | 31% | 38% | 23% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 13 | 45% | 62% | 31% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 9 | 33% | 38% | 29% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 7 | 27% | 23% | 31% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 17 | 65% | 62% | 69% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 10 | 36% | 33% | 38% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 12 | 46% | 38% | 54% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 13 | 50% | 46% | 54% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 10 | 38% | 23% | 54% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 2 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 8 | 30% | 50% | 8% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 5 | 18% | 21% | 14% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 7 | 26% | 21% | 31% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 5 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 6 | 23% | 23% | 23% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 6 | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 3 | 11% | 15% | 7% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 4 | 15% | 23% | 8% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 9 | 35% | 31% | 38% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 6 | 21% | 13% | 31% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 6 | 23% | 8% | 38% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 10 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 7 | 27% | 8% | 46% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 7 | 26% | 43% | 8% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 15% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 3 | 12% | 23% | 0% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 3 | 12% | 15% | 8% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 13% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 3 | 11% | 15% | 7% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 2 | 8% | 15% | 0% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 7 | 27% | 23% | 31% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 23% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 3 | 12% | 8% | 15% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 3 | 12% | 8% | 15% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 4 | 15% | 0% | 31% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 12 | 46% | 62% | 31% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 11 | 41% | 43% | 38% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 14 | 50% | 36% | 64% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 12 | 44% | 57% | 31% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 9 | 35% | 31% | 38% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 12 | 46% | 46% | 46% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 9 | 31% | 15% | 44% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 12 | 44% | 38% | 50% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 12 | 46% | 54% | 38% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 5 | 19% | 23% | 15% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 10 | 36% | 27% | 46% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 11 | 42% | 46% | 38% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 11 | 42% | 46% | 38% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 6 | 23% | 23% | 23% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 8% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 1 | 4% | 8% | 0% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 8% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 8% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 5 | 19% | 15% | 23% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 5 | 19% | 21% | 15% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 6 | 21% | 14% | 29% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 5 | 19% | 7% | 31% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 5 | 19% | 15% | 23% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 6 | 23% | 23% | 23% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 3 | 10% | 8% | 13% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 4 | 15% | 15% | 14% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 3 | 12% | 23% | 0% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 3 | 11% | 20% | 0% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 3 | 12% | 15% | 8% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 5 | 19% | 15% | 23% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 3 | 12% | 15% | 8% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 19 | 73% | 92% | 54% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 14 | 52% | 43% | 62% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 20 | 71% | 64% | 79% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 18 | 67% | 71% | 62% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 14 | 54% | 38% | 69% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 18 | 69% | 62% | 77% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 16 | 55% | 38% | 69% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 18 | 67% | 62% | 71% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 19 | 73% | 77% | 69% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 9 | 35% | 38% | 31% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 18 | 64% | 67% | 62% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 14 | 54% | 62% | 46% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 13 | 50% | 54% | 46% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 16 | 62% | 77% | 46% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 24 | 92% | 92% | 92% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 19 | 70% | 50% | 92% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 23 | 82% | 79% | 86% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 20 | 74% | 79% | 69% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 21 | 81% | 62% | 100% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 20 | 77% | 77% | 77% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 23 | 79% | 85% | 75% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 24 | 89% | 85% | 93% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 22 | 85% | 77% | 92% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 17 | 65% | 69% | 62% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 22 | 79% | 87% | 69% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 20 | 77% | 92% | 62% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 16 | 62% | 62% | 62% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 19 | 73% | 92% | 54% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
South Melbourne |
26 | 26 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Green Gully |
27 | 20 | 74% | 57% | 92% |
| 3 |
Oakleigh Cannons |
28 | 26 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 4 |
Heidelberg United |
27 | 24 | 89% | 93% | 85% |
| 5 |
Pascoe Vale |
26 | 23 | 88% | 77% | 100% |
| 6 |
Port Melbourne |
26 | 23 | 88% | 85% | 92% |
| 7 |
Bentleigh Greens |
29 | 27 | 93% | 100% | 88% |
| 8 |
Hume City |
27 | 24 | 89% | 85% | 93% |
| 9 |
Melbourne Knights |
26 | 24 | 92% | 85% | 100% |
| 10 |
Dandenong Thunder |
26 | 19 | 73% | 77% | 69% |
| 11 |
Avondale |
28 | 24 | 86% | 93% | 77% |
| 12 |
Kingston |
26 | 23 | 88% | 92% | 85% |
| 13 |
Dandenong City |
26 | 23 | 88% | 92% | 85% |
| 14 |
Altona Magic |
26 | 22 | 85% | 100% | 69% |
You can check out how often Dandenong Thunder and Dandenong City matches in the Victoria NPL go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
100% of Dandenong Thunder’s matches in the Victoria NPL have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 81%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Dandenong City’s case, 19% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 42%.
You can also see whether Dandenong Thunder and Dandenong City matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in Victoria NPL.
The over/under goal analysis for Dandenong Thunder vs Dandenong City offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.