Favourite this Match

Clodiense 3 - 1 Portosummaga

12.02.2023 - 08:30

Stadium: Stadio Aldo e Dino Ballarin

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Mestre Team Logo

Mestre

34 18 53%
2
Campodarsego Team Logo

Campodarsego

34 21 62%
3
Este Team Logo

Este

34 17 50%
4
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

34 19 56%
5
Adriese Team Logo

Adriese

34 21 62%
6
Levico Team Logo

Levico

34 12 35%
7
Virtus Bolzano Team Logo

Virtus Bolzano

34 23 68%
8
Montebelluna Team Logo

Montebelluna

34 18 53%
9
Cartigliano Team Logo

Cartigliano

34 22 65%
10
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

34 22 65%
11
Cjarlins Muzane Team Logo

Cjarlins Muzane

34 18 53%
12
Legnago Salus Team Logo

Legnago Salus

34 15 44%
13
Villafranca Team Logo

Villafranca

34 18 53%
14
Luparense Team Logo

Luparense

34 17 50%
15
Clodiense Team Logo

Clodiense

34 18 53%
16
Dolomiti Bellunesi Team Logo

Dolomiti Bellunesi

34 20 59%
17
Montecchio Maggiore Team Logo

Montecchio Maggiore

34 24 71%
18
Torviscosa Team Logo

Torviscosa

34 15 44%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Mestre Team Logo

Mestre

17 8 47%
2
Campodarsego Team Logo

Campodarsego

17 13 76%
3
Este Team Logo

Este

17 9 53%
4
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

17 9 53%
5
Adriese Team Logo

Adriese

17 11 65%
6
Levico Team Logo

Levico

17 4 24%
7
Virtus Bolzano Team Logo

Virtus Bolzano

17 12 71%
8
Montebelluna Team Logo

Montebelluna

17 8 47%
9
Cartigliano Team Logo

Cartigliano

17 12 71%
10
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

17 13 76%
11
Cjarlins Muzane Team Logo

Cjarlins Muzane

17 9 53%
12
Legnago Salus Team Logo

Legnago Salus

17 6 35%
13
Villafranca Team Logo

Villafranca

17 7 41%
14
Luparense Team Logo

Luparense

17 9 53%
15
Clodiense Team Logo

Clodiense

17 9 53%
16
Dolomiti Bellunesi Team Logo

Dolomiti Bellunesi

17 10 59%
17
Montecchio Maggiore Team Logo

Montecchio Maggiore

17 13 76%
18
Torviscosa Team Logo

Torviscosa

17 7 41%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Mestre Team Logo

Mestre

17 10 59%
2
Campodarsego Team Logo

Campodarsego

17 8 47%
3
Este Team Logo

Este

17 8 47%
4
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

17 10 59%
5
Adriese Team Logo

Adriese

17 10 59%
6
Levico Team Logo

Levico

17 8 47%
7
Virtus Bolzano Team Logo

Virtus Bolzano

17 11 65%
8
Montebelluna Team Logo

Montebelluna

17 10 59%
9
Cartigliano Team Logo

Cartigliano

17 10 59%
10
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

17 9 53%
11
Cjarlins Muzane Team Logo

Cjarlins Muzane

17 9 53%
12
Legnago Salus Team Logo

Legnago Salus

17 9 53%
13
Villafranca Team Logo

Villafranca

17 11 65%
14
Luparense Team Logo

Luparense

17 8 47%
15
Clodiense Team Logo

Clodiense

17 9 53%
16
Dolomiti Bellunesi Team Logo

Dolomiti Bellunesi

17 10 59%
17
Montecchio Maggiore Team Logo

Montecchio Maggiore

17 11 65%
18
Torviscosa Team Logo

Torviscosa

17 8 47%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Clodiense and Portosummaga have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group C.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 34 matches played in the Serie D Group C, Clodiense has scored and conceded goals in 18 matches. In other words, 53% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 53% at home, while it is 53% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Portosummaga has scored and conceded in 19 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie D Group C, giving them a BTTS rate of 56%. Both teams have scored in 9 of Portosummaga’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 10 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets