04.12.2022 - 08:30
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Catania | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Vibonese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Aversa Normanna | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Cittanovese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Castrovillari | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Licata | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Sancataldese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Locri 1909 | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Città Di Sant’Agata | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | San Luca | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Santa Maria Cilento | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Paternò | 34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
14 | Mariglianese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Lamezia Terme | 34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
16 | Trapani 1905 | 34 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
17 | Canicattì | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Ragusa | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Catania | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Vibonese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Aversa Normanna | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Cittanovese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Castrovillari | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Licata | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Sancataldese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Locri 1909 | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Città Di Sant’Agata | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | San Luca | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Santa Maria Cilento | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Paternò | 34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Mariglianese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Lamezia Terme | 34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
16 | Trapani 1905 | 34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
17 | Canicattì | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Ragusa | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Catania | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Vibonese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Aversa Normanna | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Cittanovese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Castrovillari | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Licata | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Sancataldese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Locri 1909 | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Città Di Sant’Agata | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | San Luca | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Santa Maria Cilento | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Paternò | 34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
14 | Mariglianese | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Lamezia Terme | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Trapani 1905 | 34 | 6% | 3% | 3% |
17 | Canicattì | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Ragusa | 34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Cittanovese vs Città Di Sant’Agata here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Cittanovese vs Città Di Sant’Agata bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D Group I, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.