# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Gangwon |
37 | 18 | 49% |
2 |
![]() Daegu |
36 | 22 | 61% |
3 |
![]() Gwangju |
38 | 17 | 45% |
4 |
![]() Suwon |
36 | 21 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Daejeon Citizen |
36 | 17 | 47% |
6 |
![]() Anyang |
36 | 23 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Asan Mugunghwa |
37 | 23 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Goyang Zaicro |
36 | 18 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Bucheon 1995 |
36 | 17 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Chungju |
36 | 22 | 61% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Gangwon |
20 | 8 | 40% |
2 |
![]() Daegu |
18 | 10 | 56% |
3 |
![]() Gwangju |
17 | 8 | 47% |
4 |
![]() Suwon |
18 | 13 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Daejeon Citizen |
18 | 5 | 28% |
6 |
![]() Anyang |
18 | 11 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Asan Mugunghwa |
19 | 12 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Goyang Zaicro |
18 | 10 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Bucheon 1995 |
18 | 10 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Chungju |
18 | 12 | 67% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Gangwon |
17 | 10 | 59% |
2 |
![]() Daegu |
18 | 12 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Gwangju |
21 | 9 | 43% |
4 |
![]() Suwon |
18 | 8 | 44% |
5 |
![]() Daejeon Citizen |
18 | 12 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Anyang |
18 | 12 | 67% |
7 |
![]() Asan Mugunghwa |
18 | 11 | 61% |
8 |
![]() Goyang Zaicro |
18 | 8 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Bucheon 1995 |
18 | 7 | 39% |
10 |
![]() Chungju |
18 | 10 | 56% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Chungju and Daejeon Citizen have both scored and conceded in the same match in the K League 2.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.