BTTS: Chile Women 0 - 0 Argentina Women
Tue, 25 February 2025 - 08:30
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bangladesh W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 2 |
Jordan W |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 3 |
Maldives W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 |
Indonesia W |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Palestine W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 6 |
Uzbekistan W |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 7 |
Belgium W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Greece W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
team.Zambia W |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 10 |
Colombia Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 11 |
Guatemala W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 12 |
Kenya W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 13 |
Puerto Rico W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 |
Aruba W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 15 |
Suriname W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 16 |
Fiji W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 17 |
Papua New Guinea W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 18 |
Malawi W |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 19 |
Venezuela W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 20 |
Ghana W |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 21 |
Côte d'Ivoire W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 |
Bhutan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 23 |
Saudi Arabia W |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 24 |
Kyrgyz Republic W |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 25 |
Cameroon Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
England Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
France Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 28 |
Sweden Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Spain Women |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 30 |
Jamaica Women |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 31 |
Norway Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Chile Women |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 33 |
Brazil Women |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 34 |
Italy Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Thailand Women |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 36 |
Netherlands Women |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 37 |
Nigeria Women |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
China Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 39 |
Canada Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 40 |
United States Women |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 41 |
Russia W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 42 |
Singapore W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Philippines Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
Taiwan W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Nepal W |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 46 |
Myanmar W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 47 |
Slovakia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Slovenia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 49 |
Wales W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
Serbia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bangladesh W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Jordan W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 3 |
Maldives W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Indonesia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Palestine W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Uzbekistan W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 7 |
Belgium W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Greece W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
team.Zambia W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 10 |
Colombia Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Guatemala W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 12 |
Kenya W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Puerto Rico W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Aruba W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Suriname W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 16 |
Fiji W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Papua New Guinea W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 18 |
Malawi W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Venezuela W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |
Ghana W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Côte d'Ivoire W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 |
Bhutan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 23 |
Saudi Arabia W |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 24 |
Kyrgyz Republic W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Cameroon Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
England Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
France Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 28 |
Sweden Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Spain Women |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 30 |
Jamaica Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Norway Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Chile Women |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 33 |
Brazil Women |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 34 |
Italy Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Thailand Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Netherlands Women |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 37 |
Nigeria Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
China Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 39 |
Canada Women |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 40 |
United States Women |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 41 |
Russia W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 42 |
Singapore W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Philippines Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Taiwan W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Nepal W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 46 |
Myanmar W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 47 |
Slovakia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Slovenia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Wales W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
Serbia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bangladesh W |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 |
Jordan W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 3 |
Maldives W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 |
Indonesia W |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Palestine W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 6 |
Uzbekistan W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Belgium W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Greece W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
team.Zambia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 |
Colombia Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 11 |
Guatemala W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Kenya W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 13 |
Puerto Rico W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 |
Aruba W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 15 |
Suriname W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Fiji W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 17 |
Papua New Guinea W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Malawi W |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 19 |
Venezuela W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 20 |
Ghana W |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 21 |
Côte d'Ivoire W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Bhutan W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Saudi Arabia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Kyrgyz Republic W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 25 |
Cameroon Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
England Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
France Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Sweden Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Spain Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Jamaica Women |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 31 |
Norway Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Chile Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Brazil Women |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 34 |
Italy Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Thailand Women |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 36 |
Netherlands Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Nigeria Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
China Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Canada Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
United States Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Russia W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Singapore W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Philippines Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 44 |
Taiwan W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Nepal W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Myanmar W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 47 |
Slovakia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Slovenia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 49 |
Wales W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
Serbia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Chile Women and Argentina Women have both scored and conceded in the same match in the International Friendlies Women.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 6 matches played in the International Friendlies Women, Chile Women has scored and conceded goals in 1 matches. In other words, 17% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 20% at home, while it is 0% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Argentina Women has scored and conceded in 1 of their 6 matches so far in the International Friendlies Women, giving them a BTTS rate of 17%. Both teams have scored in 0 of Argentina Women’s 0 home matches, and it has happened 1 times in 6 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets