Corners: Chengdu Better City FC 1 - 0 Changchun Yatai
Fri, 12 September 2025 - 07:35
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
24 | 92% | 88% | 83% | 71% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 12.25 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
23 | 78% | 74% | 61% | 52% | 35% | 30% | 26% | 11.21 |
| 3 |
Yunnan Yukun |
24 | 83% | 71% | 58% | 46% | 46% | 33% | 25% | 10.88 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
24 | 83% | 71% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.46 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng |
24 | 83% | 75% | 46% | 42% | 29% | 21% | 17% | 10.21 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
24 | 75% | 67% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 17% | 13% | 9.91 |
| 7 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
23 | 61% | 57% | 48% | 48% | 39% | 22% | 17% | 9.91 |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
23 | 65% | 48% | 43% | 39% | 39% | 35% | 30% | 9.91 |
| 9 |
Dalian Zhixing |
23 | 83% | 74% | 65% | 43% | 22% | 4% | 4% | 9.73 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG |
24 | 83% | 67% | 54% | 29% | 17% | 13% | 4% | 9.63 |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai |
24 | 63% | 58% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 21% | 13% | 9.63 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
24 | 67% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 21% | 21% | 8% | 9.29 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
24 | 54% | 50% | 29% | 25% | 25% | 21% | 17% | 9.17 |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
24 | 75% | 67% | 58% | 38% | 17% | 4% | 4% | 9.05 |
| 15 |
Hangzhou |
24 | 63% | 54% | 42% | 29% | 17% | 13% | 8% | 9.04 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
24 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 21% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8.59 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 91% | 91% | 82% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 12.27 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 82% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 11.28 |
| 3 |
Yunnan Yukun |
12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 10.41 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 75% | 67% | 50% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9.42 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng |
12 | 83% | 83% | 67% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 11.5 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 10.36 |
| 7 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
12 | 50% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 9 |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
12 | 67% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 42% | 42% | 42% | 10.5 |
| 9 |
Dalian Zhixing |
12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 10 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG |
13 | 85% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9.54 |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8.75 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
13 | 77% | 69% | 54% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 0% | 9.61 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.18 |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 83% | 75% | 67% | 42% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 9.41 |
| 15 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 75% | 67% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.83 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9.08 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
13 | 92% | 85% | 85% | 77% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 12.23 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
12 | 75% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 11.17 |
| 3 |
Yunnan Yukun |
12 | 83% | 67% | 58% | 58% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 11.34 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 92% | 75% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11.5 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng |
12 | 83% | 67% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.91 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
13 | 77% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 9.53 |
| 7 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 73% | 73% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.91 |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 9.46 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 82% | 82% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 9.73 |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 75% | 67% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 10.5 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 8.91 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 62% | 62% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 9.15 |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 67% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.67 |
| 15 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 50% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 9.25 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 58% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.08 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
24 | 83% | 75% | 54% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 4.71 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
24 | 88% | 83% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 21% | 6.08 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
24 | 67% | 50% | 38% | 21% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
24 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 13% | 5.58 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
24 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 29% | 21% | 4% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
24 | 79% | 79% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 17% | 8% | 5.13 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
24 | 96% | 96% | 96% | 88% | 83% | 58% | 29% | 8.04 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
24 | 71% | 38% | 33% | 29% | 21% | 17% | 13% | 4.21 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
23 | 83% | 74% | 65% | 48% | 39% | 30% | 26% | 6.17 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
23 | 78% | 52% | 35% | 22% | 17% | 13% | 4% | 4.04 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
24 | 58% | 38% | 29% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 4% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
24 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 58% | 38% | 21% | 13% | 5.71 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
24 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 4.13 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
23 | 74% | 52% | 26% | 26% | 22% | 13% | 4% | 4.17 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
23 | 96% | 78% | 57% | 52% | 35% | 13% | 13% | 5.43 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
24 | 75% | 54% | 42% | 33% | 29% | 21% | 8% | 4.38 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
13 | 92% | 92% | 69% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 5.31 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 75% | 75% | 75% | 58% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 5.75 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 67% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.58 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 100% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 7 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 75% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
12 | 100% | 100% | 83% | 67% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 6.42 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 73% | 36% | 9.09 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 5.73 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 82% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 6.73 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
12 | 75% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 4.08 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 92% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 5.08 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
13 | 100% | 92% | 69% | 69% | 54% | 31% | 15% | 6.46 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 92% | 75% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.83 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
12 | 75% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 4.75 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
12 | 100% | 92% | 67% | 58% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 5.92 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
12 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 4.83 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 100% | 92% | 75% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 6.42 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 67% | 58% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
13 | 77% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 75% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 4.58 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
12 | 58% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
13 | 92% | 92% | 92% | 77% | 77% | 46% | 23% | 7.15 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 62% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
12 | 83% | 67% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 5.67 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 82% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.25 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.82 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.42 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 73% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 91% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 4.91 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 8% | 3.92 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
24 | 79% | 63% | 46% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 4.92 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
24 | 79% | 58% | 38% | 33% | 21% | 13% | 13% | 4.38 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
24 | 79% | 71% | 71% | 46% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 5.21 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
24 | 71% | 63% | 46% | 33% | 29% | 21% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
24 | 92% | 67% | 54% | 46% | 29% | 17% | 17% | 5.5 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
24 | 75% | 71% | 54% | 42% | 38% | 17% | 4% | 5.08 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
24 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 33% | 21% | 17% | 0% | 4.21 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
24 | 88% | 71% | 33% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 13% | 4.96 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
23 | 78% | 65% | 52% | 39% | 22% | 17% | 13% | 5.04 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
23 | 87% | 70% | 65% | 52% | 43% | 35% | 17% | 5.87 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
24 | 96% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 29% | 13% | 4% | 4.92 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
24 | 63% | 42% | 29% | 25% | 13% | 4% | 0% | 3.58 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
24 | 71% | 63% | 58% | 46% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 4.92 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
23 | 87% | 70% | 57% | 52% | 39% | 35% | 22% | 5.74 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
23 | 74% | 57% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
24 | 88% | 79% | 67% | 58% | 46% | 38% | 25% | 6.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
13 | 77% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.23 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.67 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 83% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 5.25 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 83% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 5.08 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
12 | 67% | 67% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 5.08 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 64% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.18 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
11 | 82% | 55% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
12 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4.92 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 92% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
13 | 54% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.15 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 67% | 58% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 4.58 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
12 | 92% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 5.75 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
12 | 67% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 5.58 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.73 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
12 | 92% | 67% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 5.08 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 75% | 67% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 5.17 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
13 | 85% | 85% | 62% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 0% | 5.15 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 100% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5.92 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
12 | 83% | 75% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 0% | 5.08 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 0% | 5.08 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 92% | 85% | 54% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 6.23 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
12 | 92% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 5.5 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 6.91 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
12 | 100% | 75% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 5.83 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
12 | 75% | 67% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 5.25 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.73 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 82% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
12 | 92% | 83% | 75% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 7.42 |
The average number of corners for Chengdu Better City FC vs Changchun Yatai can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Chengdu Better City FC have averaged 9.29 corners per match during this Chinese Super League campaign. They have taken 5.71 corners per match, while they concede an average of 3.58 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Changchun Yatai, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Changchun Yatai: 9.63
- Average number of corners in favour: 4.13
- Average number of corners conceded: 5.5
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Chengdu Better City FC vs Changchun Yatai. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.