Chattanooga FC 3 - 0 Maryland Bobcats
06.08.2022 - 23:30
Stadium : Finley Stadium (Chattanooga, Tennessee)
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  California Utd Strikers | 22 | 73% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 10.05 |
| 2 |  Syracuse Pulse | 23 | 70% | 57% | 48% | 26% | 22% | 13% | 13% | 9.36 |
| 3 |  Bay Cities | 12 | 50% | 42% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.75 |
| 4 |  ASC San Diego | 23 | 70% | 52% | 35% | 30% | 17% | 13% | 9% | 8.57 |
| 5 | Maryland Bobcats | 24 | 75% | 42% | 33% | 21% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 8.55 |
| 6 |  Michigan Stars | 26 | 58% | 50% | 42% | 23% | 15% | 4% | 4% | 8.4 |
| 7 |  LA Force | 20 | 65% | 40% | 20% | 15% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 8.27 |
| 8 | Chattanooga FC | 25 | 52% | 48% | 28% | 20% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 7.96 |
| 9 |  Flower City Union | 23 | 39% | 22% | 17% | 13% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 7 |
| 10 |  Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 75% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.46 |
| 2 | Syracuse Pulse | 11 | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.45 |
| 3 | Bay Cities | 4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 4 | ASC San Diego | 11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.09 |
| 5 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 75% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.58 |
| 6 | Michigan Stars | 14 | 64% | 50% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 9.08 |
| 7 | LA Force | 11 | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 7.82 |
| 8 | Chattanooga FC | 13 | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.58 |
| 9 | Flower City Union | 11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.09 |
| 10 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Utd Strikers | 10 | 70% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 9.6 |
| 2 | Syracuse Pulse | 12 | 83% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 10.27 |
| 3 | Bay Cities | 8 | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 8.88 |
| 4 | ASC San Diego | 12 | 67% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8.08 |
| 5 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 75% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8.5 |
| 6 | Michigan Stars | 12 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 7.66 |
| 7 | LA Force | 9 | 78% | 56% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.88 |
| 8 | Chattanooga FC | 12 | 58% | 58% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.33 |
| 9 | Flower City Union | 12 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 6.91 |
| 10 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga FC | 25 | 84% | 68% | 40% | 24% | 16% | 4% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 2 | ASC San Diego | 23 | 70% | 43% | 35% | 22% | 17% | 9% | 4% | 3.83 |
| 3 | Michigan Stars | 26 | 65% | 50% | 42% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 4% | 4.24 |
| 4 | LA Force | 20 | 85% | 75% | 65% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 5% | 5.32 |
| 5 | California Utd Strikers | 22 | 91% | 86% | 73% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 5.86 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 24 | 75% | 42% | 25% | 13% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.42 |
| 7 | Bay Cities | 12 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.58 |
| 8 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 9 | Syracuse Pulse | 23 | 87% | 78% | 48% | 35% | 30% | 9% | 4% | 4.95 |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 23 | 43% | 35% | 26% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.82 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga FC | 13 | 92% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 4.83 |
| 2 | ASC San Diego | 11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.36 |
| 3 | Michigan Stars | 14 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 4.62 |
| 4 | LA Force | 11 | 82% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 5.27 |
| 5 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 92% | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 17% | 6.64 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 83% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 7 | Bay Cities | 4 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 8 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 9 | Syracuse Pulse | 11 | 100% | 82% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.45 |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 11 | 36% | 36% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.91 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga FC | 12 | 75% | 75% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 2 | ASC San Diego | 12 | 58% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 3 | Michigan Stars | 12 | 50% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 4 | LA Force | 9 | 89% | 89% | 67% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 5.38 |
| 5 | California Utd Strikers | 10 | 90% | 90% | 70% | 40% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 7 | Bay Cities | 8 | 50% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 8 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 9 | Syracuse Pulse | 12 | 75% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 50% | 17% | 8% | 5.45 |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 12 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.73 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga FC | 25 | 56% | 52% | 40% | 20% | 12% | 4% | 0% | 3.63 |
| 2 | ASC San Diego | 23 | 83% | 74% | 65% | 39% | 13% | 9% | 4% | 4.74 |
| 3 | Michigan Stars | 26 | 77% | 54% | 38% | 27% | 19% | 4% | 0% | 4.16 |
| 4 | LA Force | 20 | 55% | 40% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 2.95 |
| 5 | California Utd Strikers | 22 | 68% | 50% | 41% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 4.19 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 24 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 5.13 |
| 7 | Bay Cities | 12 | 92% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 5.17 |
| 8 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 9 | Syracuse Pulse | 23 | 70% | 48% | 43% | 30% | 26% | 17% | 4% | 4.41 |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 23 | 78% | 65% | 30% | 22% | 9% | 4% | 4% | 4.18 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga FC | 13 | 31% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 2 | ASC San Diego | 11 | 82% | 82% | 82% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 3 | Michigan Stars | 14 | 71% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 4.46 |
| 4 | LA Force | 11 | 36% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 2.55 |
| 5 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.82 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 83% | 83% | 58% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 5.08 |
| 7 | Bay Cities | 4 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5.25 |
| 8 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 9 | Syracuse Pulse | 11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 11 | 91% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.18 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga FC | 12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 2 | ASC San Diego | 12 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 4.75 |
| 3 | Michigan Stars | 12 | 83% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 4 | LA Force | 9 | 78% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 5 | California Utd Strikers | 10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.6 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 12 | 92% | 67% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 5.17 |
| 7 | Bay Cities | 8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 5.13 |
| 8 | Valley United | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 9 | Syracuse Pulse | 12 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 4.82 |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 12 | 67% | 58% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.18 |
The average number of corners for Chattanooga FC vs Maryland Bobcats can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Chattanooga FC have averaged 7.96 corners per match during this NISA campaign. They have taken 4.33 corners per match, while they concede an average of 3.63 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Maryland Bobcats, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Maryland Bobcats: 8.55
- Average number of corners in favour: 3.42
- Average number of corners conceded: 5.13
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Chattanooga FC vs Maryland Bobcats. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.