21.10.2017 - 23:00
Stadium : MUSC Health Stadium
Finished
Eastern Conference
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Louisville City | 32 | 18 | 8 | 6 | 58 | 31 | +27 | 62 | 1.94 | |
2 | Charleston Battery | 32 | 15 | 9 | 8 | 53 | 33 | +20 | 54 | 1.69 | |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 32 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 50 | 35 | +15 | 53 | 1.66 | |
4 | Rochester Rhinos | 32 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 36 | 28 | +8 | 53 | 1.66 | |
5 | Charlotte Independence | 32 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 52 | 40 | +12 | 48 | 1.50 | |
6 | FC Cincinnati | 32 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 46 | 48 | -2 | 46 | 1.44 | |
7 | Philadelphia Union II | 32 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 46 | 45 | +1 | 44 | 1.38 | |
8 | New York RB II | 32 | 13 | 5 | 14 | 57 | 60 | -3 | 44 | 1.38 | |
9 | Orlando City II | 32 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 37 | 36 | +1 | 42 | 1.31 | |
10 | Ottawa Fury | 32 | 8 | 14 | 10 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 38 | 1.19 | |
11 | Penn FC | 32 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 28 | 47 | -19 | 37 | 1.16 | |
12 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 32 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 33 | 42 | -9 | 36 | 1.13 | |
13 | Saint Louis | 32 | 9 | 9 | 14 | 35 | 48 | -13 | 36 | 1.13 | |
14 | Richmond Kickers | 32 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 36 | -12 | 32 | 1.00 | |
15 | Toronto II | 32 | 6 | 7 | 19 | 27 | 54 | -27 | 25 | 0.78 |
Western Conference
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Real Monarchs | 32 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 59 | 31 | +28 | 67 | 2.09 | |
2 | San Antonio | 32 | 17 | 11 | 4 | 45 | 24 | +21 | 62 | 1.94 | |
3 | Reno 1868 | 32 | 17 | 8 | 7 | 75 | 39 | +36 | 59 | 1.84 | |
4 | Sporting KC II | 32 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 55 | 37 | +18 | 58 | 1.81 | |
5 | Phoenix Rising | 32 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 50 | 37 | +13 | 58 | 1.81 | |
6 | OKC Energy | 32 | 14 | 7 | 11 | 46 | 41 | +5 | 49 | 1.53 | |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 32 | 13 | 7 | 12 | 45 | 43 | +2 | 46 | 1.44 | |
8 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 32 | 14 | 4 | 14 | 46 | 49 | -3 | 46 | 1.44 | |
9 | Colorado Springs | 32 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 55 | 51 | +4 | 44 | 1.38 | |
10 | Orange County SC | 32 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 43 | 47 | -4 | 43 | 1.34 | |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 32 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 37 | 50 | -13 | 35 | 1.09 | |
12 | Tacoma Defiance | 32 | 9 | 4 | 19 | 42 | 61 | -19 | 31 | 0.97 | |
13 | LA Galaxy II | 32 | 8 | 5 | 19 | 32 | 64 | -32 | 29 | 0.91 | |
14 | Whitecaps II | 32 | 5 | 9 | 18 | 32 | 52 | -20 | 24 | 0.75 | |
15 | Portland Timbers II | 32 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 27 | 63 | -36 | 15 | 0.47 |
At the moment, Charleston Battery is in 2nd in the USL Championship. In 32 matches, Charleston Battery has 15 wins, 9 draws, and 8 losses.
The club has picked up 54 points (adding up all matches, including knockout matches). So based on points per match, they have picked up 1.69 points per match to date in the tournament.
Here are more stats from Charleston Battery’s campaign at home in the USL Championship below:
If we only look at Charleston Battery’s away matches, this is their current record:
As for New York RB II’s campaign, they sit in 8th in the competition table and this is the current state of their USL Championship campaign:
As a result, New York RB II has, in terms of the overall campaign, the 8th position on the leaderboard. When New York RB II plays as home team, the situation is as follows: 16 games, 10 wins, 0 draws and 6 losses.
Now, when playing away from home, New York RB II adds:
The competition table helps provide an overview of the teams’ performance during the current campaign and helps identify patterns, trends, and statistics relevant to analysing Charleston Battery vs New York RB II.
With this data, you can check each club’s goal production, their position in the table, their goal difference, and other factors that can be useful for predicting the outcome of the match.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.