Changchun Yatai 2 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring
12.09.2020 - 12:00
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Hangzhou | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 2 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 3 |  Beijing Renhe | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 4 |  Guizhou Zhicheng | 15 | 9 | 60% |
| 5 |  Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 6 |  Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 7 |  Beijing BG | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 8 |  Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 9 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 11 | 65% |
| 10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 11 |  Shaanxi Chang'an | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 12 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 13 |  Shenyang Urban | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 14 |  Taizhou Yuanda | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 15 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 16 |  Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 17 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 15 | 10 | 67% |
| 18 |  Kunshan | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hangzhou | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 2 | Changchun Yatai | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 3 | Beijing Renhe | 8 | 7 | 88% |
| 4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 5 | Meizhou Hakka | 7 | 5 | 71% |
| 6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 7 | Beijing BG | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 9 | 4 | 44% |
| 11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 13 | Shenyang Urban | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 18 | Kunshan | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hangzhou | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 2 | Changchun Yatai | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 3 | Beijing Renhe | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 4 | Guizhou Zhicheng | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 5 | Meizhou Hakka | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 6 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 7 | Beijing BG | 7 | 6 | 86% |
| 8 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 9 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 9 | 7 | 78% |
| 10 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 11 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 12 | Nantong Zhiyun | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 13 | Shenyang Urban | 7 | 1 | 14% |
| 14 | Taizhou Yuanda | 7 | 5 | 71% |
| 15 | Suzhou Dongwu | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 18 | Kunshan | 8 | 0 | 0% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Changchun Yatai and Heilongjiang Lava Spring have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 15 matches played in the China League One, Changchun Yatai has scored and conceded goals in 6 matches. In other words, 40% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 38% at home, while it is 43% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Heilongjiang Lava Spring has scored and conceded in 9 of their 17 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 53%. Both teams have scored in 4 of Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s 9 home matches, and it has happened 5 times in 8 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets