| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Créteil |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chambly |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 3 |
Épinal |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 4 |
Furiani-Agliani |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Fleury 91 |
30 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Beauvais |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 7 |
Wasquehal |
30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
| 8 |
Aubervilliers |
30 | 7% | 7% | 3% |
| 9 |
Haguenau |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Chantilly |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 11 |
Biesheim |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 12 |
Feignies-Aulnoye |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Bobigny AC |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
| 14 |
FB Île Rousse |
30 | 7% | 7% | 3% |
| 15 |
Villers Houlgate CF |
30 | 7% | 7% | 3% |
| 16 |
Thionville Lusitanos |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Créteil |
30 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chambly |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
| 3 |
Épinal |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Furiani-Agliani |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Fleury 91 |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Beauvais |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Wasquehal |
30 | 10% | 10% | 7% |
| 8 |
Aubervilliers |
30 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 9 |
Haguenau |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Chantilly |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 11 |
Biesheim |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Feignies-Aulnoye |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Bobigny AC |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
| 14 |
FB Île Rousse |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
| 15 |
Villers Houlgate CF |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
| 16 |
Thionville Lusitanos |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Créteil |
30 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chambly |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 3 |
Épinal |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 4 |
Furiani-Agliani |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Fleury 91 |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
| 6 |
Beauvais |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 7 |
Wasquehal |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
| 8 |
Aubervilliers |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Haguenau |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Chantilly |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Biesheim |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
| 12 |
Feignies-Aulnoye |
30 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Bobigny AC |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
| 14 |
FB Île Rousse |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
| 15 |
Villers Houlgate CF |
30 | 7% | 7% | 3% |
| 16 |
Thionville Lusitanos |
30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Chambly vs Feignies-Aulnoye here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Chambly vs Feignies-Aulnoye bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the National 2 Group C, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.