Casale vs Derthona Both Teams Score Stats

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Novara	38	17	45%
2	Caronnese	38	16	42%
3	Sestri Levante	38	22	58%
4	Chieri	38	20	53%
5	Sanremo	38	20	53%
6	Gozzano	38	10	26%
7	Bra	38	15	39%
8	Borgosesia	38	18	47%
9	Casale	38	18	47%
10	Fossano	38	15	39%
11	Lavagnese	38	18	47%
12	Vado	38	19	50%
13	Ligorna	38	18	47%
14	Derthona	38	19	50%
15	Saluzzo	38	13	34%
16	Imperia	38	15	39%
17	PDHAE	38	19	50%
18	Città di Varese	38	20	53%
19	Asti	38	21	55%
20	RG Ticino	38	15	39%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Novara

45%

Caronnese

42%

Sestri Levante

58%

Chieri

53%

Sanremo

53%

Gozzano

26%

Bra

39%

Borgosesia

47%

Casale

47%

Fossano

39%

Lavagnese

47%

Vado

50%

Ligorna

47%

Derthona

50%

Saluzzo

34%

Imperia

39%

PDHAE

50%

Città di Varese

53%

Asti

55%

RG Ticino

39%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Novara	19	8	42%
2	Caronnese	19	8	42%
3	Sestri Levante	19	13	68%
4	Chieri	19	9	47%
5	Sanremo	19	7	37%
6	Gozzano	19	7	37%
7	Bra	19	5	26%
8	Borgosesia	19	8	42%
9	Casale	19	8	42%
10	Fossano	19	9	47%
11	Lavagnese	19	12	63%
12	Vado	19	14	74%
13	Ligorna	19	10	53%
14	Derthona	19	10	53%
15	Saluzzo	19	6	32%
16	Imperia	19	6	32%
17	PDHAE	19	7	37%
18	Città di Varese	19	10	53%
19	Asti	19	11	58%
20	RG Ticino	19	6	32%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Novara

42%

Caronnese

42%

Sestri Levante

68%

Chieri

47%

Sanremo

37%

Gozzano

37%

Bra

26%

Borgosesia

42%

Casale

42%

Fossano

47%

Lavagnese

63%

Vado

74%

Ligorna

53%

Derthona

53%

Saluzzo

32%

Imperia

32%

PDHAE

37%

Città di Varese

53%

Asti

58%

RG Ticino

32%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Novara	19	9	47%
2	Caronnese	19	8	42%
3	Sestri Levante	19	9	47%
4	Chieri	19	11	58%
5	Sanremo	19	13	68%
6	Gozzano	19	3	16%
7	Bra	19	10	53%
8	Borgosesia	19	10	53%
9	Casale	19	10	53%
10	Fossano	19	6	32%
11	Lavagnese	19	6	32%
12	Vado	19	5	26%
13	Ligorna	19	8	42%
14	Derthona	19	9	47%
15	Saluzzo	19	7	37%
16	Imperia	19	9	47%
17	PDHAE	19	12	63%
18	Città di Varese	19	10	53%
19	Asti	19	10	53%
20	RG Ticino	19	9	47%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Novara

47%

Caronnese

42%

Sestri Levante

47%

Chieri

58%

Sanremo

68%

Gozzano

16%

Bra

53%

Borgosesia

53%

Casale

53%

Fossano

32%

Lavagnese

32%

Vado

26%

Ligorna

42%

Derthona

47%

Saluzzo

37%

Imperia

47%

PDHAE

63%

Città di Varese

53%

Asti

53%

RG Ticino

47%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Casale and Derthona have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group A.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

In 38 matches played in the Serie D Group A, Casale has scored and conceded goals in 18 matches. In other words, 47% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 42% at home, while it is 53% away from home.
Meanwhile, Derthona has scored and conceded in 19 of their 38 matches so far in the Serie D Group A, giving them a BTTS rate of 50%. Both teams have scored in 10 of Derthona’s 19 home matches, and it has happened 9 times in 19 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets

Casale 1 - 2 Derthona

Both Teams to Score