# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Vannes |
30 | 20% | 13% | 13% |
2 |
![]() Granville |
30 | 17% | 10% | 7% |
3 |
![]() Poissy |
30 | 43% | 33% | 17% |
4 |
![]() St-Pryvé St-Hilaire |
30 | 37% | 23% | 20% |
5 |
![]() Lorient II |
30 | 27% | 17% | 13% |
6 |
![]() Vitré |
30 | 57% | 33% | 27% |
7 |
![]() Saint-Malo |
30 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
8 |
![]() Romorantin |
30 | 30% | 23% | 13% |
9 |
![]() Stade Plabennec |
30 | 37% | 27% | 23% |
10 |
![]() Chateaubriant Voltigeurs |
30 | 17% | 13% | 3% |
11 |
![]() Rouen |
30 | 40% | 17% | 7% |
12 |
![]() Blois |
30 | 47% | 33% | 20% |
13 |
![]() Versailles |
30 | 23% | 10% | 7% |
14 |
![]() C' Chartres |
30 | 47% | 37% | 23% |
15 |
![]() Caen II |
30 | 23% | 13% | 10% |
16 |
![]() Guingamp II |
30 | 37% | 23% | 17% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Vannes |
30 | 37% | 23% | 10% |
2 |
![]() Granville |
30 | 23% | 3% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Poissy |
30 | 47% | 37% | 10% |
4 |
![]() St-Pryvé St-Hilaire |
30 | 40% | 17% | 10% |
5 |
![]() Lorient II |
30 | 30% | 10% | 10% |
6 |
![]() Vitré |
30 | 37% | 23% | 17% |
7 |
![]() Saint-Malo |
30 | 33% | 3% | 3% |
8 |
![]() Romorantin |
30 | 33% | 27% | 13% |
9 |
![]() Stade Plabennec |
30 | 33% | 27% | 13% |
10 |
![]() Chateaubriant Voltigeurs |
30 | 30% | 7% | 3% |
11 |
![]() Rouen |
30 | 43% | 17% | 10% |
12 |
![]() Blois |
30 | 40% | 23% | 13% |
13 |
![]() Versailles |
30 | 30% | 13% | 3% |
14 |
![]() C' Chartres |
30 | 47% | 30% | 13% |
15 |
![]() Caen II |
30 | 23% | 13% | 10% |
16 |
![]() Guingamp II |
30 | 43% | 17% | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Vannes |
30 | 17% | 10% | 3% |
2 |
![]() Granville |
30 | 23% | 13% | 3% |
3 |
![]() Poissy |
30 | 37% | 20% | 13% |
4 |
![]() St-Pryvé St-Hilaire |
30 | 43% | 20% | 13% |
5 |
![]() Lorient II |
30 | 37% | 23% | 10% |
6 |
![]() Vitré |
30 | 57% | 37% | 13% |
7 |
![]() Saint-Malo |
30 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
8 |
![]() Romorantin |
30 | 43% | 17% | 13% |
9 |
![]() Stade Plabennec |
30 | 37% | 30% | 23% |
10 |
![]() Chateaubriant Voltigeurs |
30 | 23% | 13% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Rouen |
30 | 33% | 10% | 7% |
12 |
![]() Blois |
30 | 57% | 30% | 13% |
13 |
![]() Versailles |
30 | 30% | 7% | 7% |
14 |
![]() C' Chartres |
30 | 47% | 23% | 17% |
15 |
![]() Caen II |
30 | 30% | 7% | 3% |
16 |
![]() Guingamp II |
30 | 37% | 17% | 3% |
Check out all the card statistics for C' Chartres vs Lorient II here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for C' Chartres vs Lorient II bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the National 2 Group A, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.