# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Figueirense |
19 | 9 | 47% |
2 |
![]() ABC |
19 | 7 | 37% |
3 |
![]() Náutico |
19 | 13 | 68% |
4 |
![]() Sampaio Corrêa |
19 | 8 | 42% |
5 |
![]() Londrina |
25 | 13 | 52% |
6 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
27 | 18 | 67% |
7 |
![]() Botafogo-PB |
25 | 14 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Confiança |
19 | 7 | 37% |
9 |
![]() CSA |
19 | 12 | 63% |
10 |
![]() Remo |
25 | 12 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Tombense |
19 | 9 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Ypiranga Erechim |
25 | 9 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Caxias |
19 | 9 | 47% |
14 |
![]() EC São José |
19 | 6 | 32% |
15 |
![]() Aparecidense |
19 | 10 | 53% |
16 |
![]() São Bernardo |
25 | 10 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Ferroviária |
25 | 11 | 44% |
18 |
![]() Ferroviário |
19 | 12 | 63% |
19 |
![]() Floresta |
19 | 9 | 47% |
20 |
![]() Athletic Club |
27 | 16 | 59% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Figueirense |
9 | 3 | 33% |
2 |
![]() ABC |
10 | 3 | 30% |
3 |
![]() Náutico |
10 | 7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Sampaio Corrêa |
10 | 6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Londrina |
13 | 8 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
14 | 10 | 71% |
7 |
![]() Botafogo-PB |
13 | 6 | 46% |
8 |
![]() Confiança |
10 | 4 | 40% |
9 |
![]() CSA |
9 | 7 | 78% |
10 |
![]() Remo |
12 | 4 | 33% |
11 |
![]() Tombense |
10 | 4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Ypiranga Erechim |
12 | 4 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Caxias |
9 | 3 | 33% |
14 |
![]() EC São José |
10 | 2 | 20% |
15 |
![]() Aparecidense |
9 | 6 | 67% |
16 |
![]() São Bernardo |
13 | 4 | 31% |
17 |
![]() Ferroviária |
12 | 8 | 67% |
18 |
![]() Ferroviário |
9 | 5 | 56% |
19 |
![]() Floresta |
9 | 6 | 67% |
20 |
![]() Athletic Club |
13 | 7 | 54% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Figueirense |
10 | 6 | 60% |
2 |
![]() ABC |
9 | 4 | 44% |
3 |
![]() Náutico |
9 | 6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Sampaio Corrêa |
9 | 2 | 22% |
5 |
![]() Londrina |
12 | 5 | 42% |
6 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
13 | 8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Botafogo-PB |
12 | 8 | 67% |
8 |
![]() Confiança |
9 | 3 | 33% |
9 |
![]() CSA |
10 | 5 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Remo |
13 | 8 | 62% |
11 |
![]() Tombense |
9 | 5 | 56% |
12 |
![]() Ypiranga Erechim |
13 | 5 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Caxias |
10 | 6 | 60% |
14 |
![]() EC São José |
9 | 4 | 44% |
15 |
![]() Aparecidense |
10 | 4 | 40% |
16 |
![]() São Bernardo |
12 | 6 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Ferroviária |
13 | 3 | 23% |
18 |
![]() Ferroviário |
10 | 7 | 70% |
19 |
![]() Floresta |
10 | 3 | 30% |
20 |
![]() Athletic Club |
14 | 9 | 64% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Botafogo-PB and ABC have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie C.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.