# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Beijing Renhe |
30 | 16 | 53% |
2 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
30 | 13 | 43% |
3 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 9 | 30% |
4 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 9 | 30% |
5 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 8 | 27% |
6 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 7 | 23% |
7 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 7 | 23% |
8 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 7 | 23% |
9 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 7 | 23% |
10 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 6 | 20% |
11 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
30 | 6 | 20% |
12 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
30 | 5 | 17% |
13 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 4 | 13% |
14 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 3 | 10% |
15 |
![]() Yunnan Lijiang |
30 | 3 | 10% |
16 |
![]() Baoding Yingli Yitong |
30 | 2 | 7% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Beijing Renhe |
16 | 9 | 56% |
2 |
![]() Hangzhou |
15 | 7 | 47% |
3 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
15 | 6 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
15 | 6 | 40% |
5 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
15 | 6 | 40% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
15 | 5 | 33% |
7 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 5 | 33% |
8 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 4 | 27% |
9 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 4 | 27% |
10 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
15 | 4 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 4 | 27% |
12 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
15 | 4 | 27% |
13 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 3 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
15 | 2 | 13% |
15 |
![]() Yunnan Lijiang |
15 | 1 | 7% |
16 |
![]() Baoding Yingli Yitong |
14 | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Beijing Renhe |
14 | 7 | 50% |
2 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
15 | 7 | 47% |
3 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 6 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
15 | 3 | 20% |
5 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 3 | 20% |
6 |
![]() Hangzhou |
15 | 2 | 13% |
7 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 2 | 13% |
8 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 2 | 13% |
9 |
![]() Yunnan Lijiang |
15 | 2 | 13% |
10 |
![]() Baoding Yingli Yitong |
16 | 2 | 13% |
11 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
15 | 2 | 13% |
12 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
15 | 1 | 7% |
13 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
15 | 1 | 7% |
14 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
15 | 1 | 7% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
15 | 1 | 7% |
16 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 0 | 0% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Baoding Yingli Yitong vs Meizhou Hakka:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.