Austin Bold 4 - 1 Rio Grande Valley
09.08.2020 - 01:00
Stadium : Bold Stadium (Austin)
Finished
Clean Sheet
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  North Carolina FC | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 2 |  Indy Eleven | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 3 |  Miami FC | 16 | 1 | 6% |
| 4 |  Tampa Bay Rowdies | 19 | 8 | 42% |
| 5 |  Phoenix Rising | 19 | 5 | 26% |
| 6 |  Las Vegas Lights | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |  Atlanta United II | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |  Tacoma Defiance | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 9 |  Tulsa Roughnecks | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 10 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 11 |  OKC Energy | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 12 |  LA Galaxy II | 17 | 2 | 12% |
| 13 |  Sacramento Republic | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 14 |  Reno 1868 | 18 | 1 | 6% |
| 15 |  Philadelphia Union II | 16 | 2 | 13% |
| 16 | Rio Grande Valley | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 17 |  Charleston Battery | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 18 |  Charlotte Independence | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 19 |  New York RB II | 16 | 1 | 6% |
| 20 |  Colorado Springs | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 21 |  Louisville City | 19 | 9 | 47% |
| 22 |  Real Monarchs | 16 | 1 | 6% |
| 23 |  Saint Louis | 18 | 3 | 17% |
| 24 |  Portland Timbers II | 16 | 1 | 6% |
| 25 |  Orange County SC | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 26 |  San Antonio | 17 | 7 | 41% |
| 27 |  Sporting KC II | 16 | 2 | 13% |
| 28 |  New Mexico United | 17 | 7 | 41% |
| 29 |  Memphis 901 | 15 | 1 | 7% |
| 30 |  Loudoun United | 13 | 1 | 8% |
| 31 |  Hartford Athletic | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 32 |  Birmingham Legion | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 33 |  El Paso Locomotive | 19 | 8 | 42% |
| 34 | Austin Bold | 16 | 3 | 19% |
| 35 |  San Diego Loyal | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 2 | Indy Eleven | 10 | 2 | 20% |
| 3 | Miami FC | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 10 | 4 | 40% |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 11 | 4 | 36% |
| 6 | Las Vegas Lights | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 | Atlanta United II | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 33% |
| 9 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 10 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 11 | OKC Energy | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 12 | LA Galaxy II | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 13 | Sacramento Republic | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 14 | Reno 1868 | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | Philadelphia Union II | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 16 | Rio Grande Valley | 7 | 1 | 14% |
| 17 | Charleston Battery | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 18 | Charlotte Independence | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 19 | New York RB II | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 20 | Colorado Springs | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 21 | Louisville City | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 22 | Real Monarchs | 11 | 1 | 9% |
| 23 | Saint Louis | 10 | 1 | 10% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers II | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 25 | Orange County SC | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 26 | San Antonio | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 28 | New Mexico United | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 | Memphis 901 | 7 | 1 | 14% |
| 30 | Loudoun United | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 | Hartford Athletic | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 | Birmingham Legion | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 33 | El Paso Locomotive | 12 | 3 | 25% |
| 34 | Austin Bold | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 35 | San Diego Loyal | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 2 | Indy Eleven | 6 | 1 | 17% |
| 3 | Miami FC | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 4 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 9 | 4 | 44% |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 6 | Las Vegas Lights | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 | Atlanta United II | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 1 | 10% |
| 9 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 10 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 11 | OKC Energy | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 12 | LA Galaxy II | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 13 | Sacramento Republic | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 14 | Reno 1868 | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 15 | Philadelphia Union II | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | Rio Grande Valley | 7 | 1 | 14% |
| 17 | Charleston Battery | 10 | 2 | 20% |
| 18 | Charlotte Independence | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 19 | New York RB II | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 | Colorado Springs | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 | Louisville City | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 22 | Real Monarchs | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 | Saint Louis | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers II | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 | Orange County SC | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 26 | San Antonio | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 28 | New Mexico United | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 29 | Memphis 901 | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | Loudoun United | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 31 | Hartford Athletic | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 32 | Birmingham Legion | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 33 | El Paso Locomotive | 7 | 5 | 71% |
| 34 | Austin Bold | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 35 | San Diego Loyal | 8 | 3 | 38% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Austin Bold vs Rio Grande Valley:
- Austin Bold has played 16 matches and kept opponents from scoring a single goal in 3 of them. In other words, they have kept a clean sheet in 19% of their matches.
- In 8 home matches in the USL Championship, Austin Bold has had 2 matches without conceding a goal. Rio Grande Valley has played 16 matches and has shut out opponents on 2 occasions. That means they have held clean sheets in 14% of their matches.
- In 7 home matches played in the USL Championship, Rio Grande Valley has had 1 matches without conceding a single goal. And away from home, they have a 14% clean sheet rate as the visiting side.
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.