Country
Teams
Season
Matches
Vietnam
15
2025/2026
76/95
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 10.55 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10.1 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9.18 |
| 4 |
Ha Noi
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.91 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 8.9 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 8.09 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
11 | 64% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.81 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 7.8 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.45 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
10 | 70% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.4 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.18 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.7 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10.2 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 10.17 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 10.16 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 9.84 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9 |
| 6 |
PVF-CAND
|
6 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 7 |
Viettel
|
4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.83 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 7.67 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
6 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.16 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.8 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
5 | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 11 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.5 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 10.33 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 9.67 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.83 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 7 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 8 |
| 8 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.84 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.6 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
5 | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
6 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.84 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.34 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
11 | 91% | 91% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 9% | 6.09 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
11 | 100% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.64 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Viettel
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 8 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.1 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 11 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
11 | 45% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
11 | 73% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 13 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 50% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.1 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
11 | 64% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.82 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 7 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 6 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5.17 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 |
PVF-CAND
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4.83 |
| 8 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 9 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.2 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
6 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 15 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 6.25 |
| 3 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 83% | 83% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 5.33 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 100% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 5.2 |
| 5 |
Viettel
|
6 | 100% | 83% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
6 | 83% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 100% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5.91 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5.73 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.91 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 7 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.18 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.91 |
| 16 |
Viettel
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
6 | 100% | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 5.83 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 4 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 10 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 8.33 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.8 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.2 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 5 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.6 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
4 | 100% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 10 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 100% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
If you like numbers, corner kick stats in V.League 1 make a huge difference - especially if you’re betting, following the league closely, or just want to understand the game better.
That’s exactly why APWin is handy. Here you get solid, up-to-date numbers, like:
Average corners per game
Teams that get the most and fewest corners
Teams that give away the most corners to opponents
And some deeper corner stats for V.League 1 2025/26
So far, matches in V.League 1 2025/26 are seeing an average of 8.43 corners per game.
On this page, you can check all the corner averages for the league, broken down by team and game context.
Team with the highest corner average: Hai Phong - averaging 10.55 corners per match, counting both corners they get and corners they concede.
Team with the lowest corner average: Quang Nam - averaging 8 corners per match in their games.
Besides overall averages, APWin also breaks it down team by team, so you can see how each side handles corners.
Most corners for: Ha Noi – averaging 6.09 corners per game.
Fewest corners for: Quang Nam – averaging 2 corners per match.
Most corners conceded: Da Nang – giving away 5.91 corners per game.
Fewest corners conceded: Quang Nam – giving up 6 corners per match.
Here, you can also:
Filter stats for V.League 1 by home or away games
See how teams behave in different situations
Track corner trends day by day - perfect for spotting betting chances
Numbers are great, but they’re even better when you can use them to make smarter bets. APWin gives you tips on corner markets, too, like over corners or under corners, helping you spot opportunities before the game even kicks off.
Stats show that Hai Phong leads with 10.55 corners per game. Nam Dinh is 2nd with 10.1, and Hoang Anh Gia Lai comes 3rd with 9.18 corners per match.
Right now, the league average is 8.43 corners per game.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.