# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() El Farolito |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Duluth FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Academica |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Riverside Coras |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() FC Arizona |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Oxnard Guerreros |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Temecula |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Med City FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Aris |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() FC Golden State |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Sacramento Gold |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Kalamazoo FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() FC Indiana |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Milwaukee Torrent |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Rochester Lancers |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Syracuse FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Cleveland SC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Sonoma County Sol |
2 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() FC Columbus |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() FC Davis |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() FC Buffalo |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Dakota Fusion FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
3 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
28 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() AS Los Angeles |
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
30 |
![]() Pittsburgh Hotspurs |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() High Desert Elite |
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
32 |
![]() Toledo Villa |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Las Vegas Legends FC |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Project 51O |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Mobile |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Tallahassee |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Pensacola |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Port City |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Muskegon Risers |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Carpathia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 |
![]() Fort Wayne |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() El Farolito |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Duluth FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Academica |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Riverside Coras |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() FC Arizona |
3 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Oxnard Guerreros |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Temecula |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Med City FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Aris |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() FC Golden State |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Sacramento Gold |
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Kalamazoo FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() FC Indiana |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Milwaukee Torrent |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Rochester Lancers |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Syracuse FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Cleveland SC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Sonoma County Sol |
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
23 |
![]() FC Columbus |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() FC Davis |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() FC Buffalo |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Dakota Fusion FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
3 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
28 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() AS Los Angeles |
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
30 |
![]() Pittsburgh Hotspurs |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() High Desert Elite |
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Toledo Villa |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Las Vegas Legends FC |
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Project 51O |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Mobile |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Tallahassee |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Pensacola |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Port City |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Muskegon Risers |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Carpathia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 |
![]() Fort Wayne |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() El Farolito |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Duluth FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Academica |
2 | 100% | 50% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Riverside Coras |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() FC Arizona |
3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Oxnard Guerreros |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Temecula |
3 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Med City FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Aris |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() FC Golden State |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Sacramento Gold |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Kalamazoo FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() FC Indiana |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Milwaukee Torrent |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Rochester Lancers |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Syracuse FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Cleveland SC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Sonoma County Sol |
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
23 |
![]() FC Columbus |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() FC Davis |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() FC Buffalo |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Dakota Fusion FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
3 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada II |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() AS Los Angeles |
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% |
30 |
![]() Pittsburgh Hotspurs |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() High Desert Elite |
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
32 |
![]() Toledo Villa |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Las Vegas Legends FC |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Project 51O |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Mobile |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Tallahassee |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Pensacola |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Port City |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Muskegon Risers |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Carpathia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 |
![]() Fort Wayne |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Temecula vs FC Golden State here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Temecula vs FC Golden State bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the NPSL, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.