BTTS: Canada Women 4 - 1 Haiti Women
Sat, 31 May 2025 - 14:00
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bangladesh W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 2 |
Czech Republic W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 |
Republic of Ireland Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Switzerland Women |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
team.Zambia W |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 6 |
Guatemala W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 7 |
Tunisia W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 |
Ethiopia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Côte d'Ivoire W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 10 |
Lesotho W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Saudi Arabia W |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 12 |
Sri Lanka W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Slovenia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 |
Bolivia W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 15 |
Cambodia |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Nigeria Women |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Portugal Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Congo DR W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 19 |
Singapore W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Serbia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Belarus Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Iceland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Gibraltar W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Jordan W |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 25 |
Maldives W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 26 |
Indonesia W |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Uzbekistan W |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 28 |
Belgium W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Kosovo W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 30 |
Estonia W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 31 |
Finland W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 32 |
Latvia W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 33 |
Colombia Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 34 |
Paraguay W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 35 |
Panama Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 36 |
Uruguay W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 37 |
Ghana W |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 38 |
Comoros W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 39 |
Kyrgyz Republic W |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 40 |
Djibouti W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Guam W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Botswana W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 43 |
Malaysia W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 44 |
Bhutan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 45 |
Palestine W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 46 |
Poland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Ukraine W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Fiji W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 49 |
Papua New Guinea W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 50 |
Greece W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bangladesh W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Czech Republic W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Republic of Ireland Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Switzerland Women |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
team.Zambia W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 6 |
Guatemala W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 7 |
Tunisia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Ethiopia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Côte d'Ivoire W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 10 |
Lesotho W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Saudi Arabia W |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 12 |
Sri Lanka W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Slovenia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Bolivia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Cambodia |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Nigeria Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Portugal Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Congo DR W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Singapore W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Serbia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Belarus Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Iceland W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Gibraltar W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Jordan W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 25 |
Maldives W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Indonesia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Uzbekistan W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 28 |
Belgium W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Kosovo W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Estonia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 31 |
Finland W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Latvia W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 33 |
Colombia Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Paraguay W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 35 |
Panama Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 36 |
Uruguay W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Ghana W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Comoros W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Kyrgyz Republic W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Djibouti W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Guam W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Botswana W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Malaysia W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 44 |
Bhutan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 45 |
Palestine W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Poland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Ukraine W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Fiji W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Papua New Guinea W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 50 |
Greece W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bangladesh W |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 |
Czech Republic W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 |
Republic of Ireland Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Switzerland Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
team.Zambia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 |
Guatemala W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Tunisia W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 |
Ethiopia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Côte d'Ivoire W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Lesotho W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Saudi Arabia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Sri Lanka W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Slovenia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 |
Bolivia W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 15 |
Cambodia |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Nigeria Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Portugal Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Congo DR W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 19 |
Singapore W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Serbia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Belarus Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Iceland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Gibraltar W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Jordan W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 25 |
Maldives W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 26 |
Indonesia W |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Uzbekistan W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Belgium W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Kosovo W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 30 |
Estonia W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 31 |
Finland W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 32 |
Latvia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Colombia Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 34 |
Paraguay W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Panama Women |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 36 |
Uruguay W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 37 |
Ghana W |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 38 |
Comoros W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 39 |
Kyrgyz Republic W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 40 |
Djibouti W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Guam W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
Botswana W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 43 |
Malaysia W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
Bhutan W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Palestine W |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 46 |
Poland W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Ukraine W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Fiji W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 49 |
Papua New Guinea W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
Greece W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Canada Women and Haiti Women have both scored and conceded in the same match in the International Friendlies Women.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 6 matches played in the International Friendlies Women, Canada Women has scored and conceded goals in 3 matches. In other words, 50% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 60% at home, while it is 0% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Haiti Women has scored and conceded in 4 of their 5 matches so far in the International Friendlies Women, giving them a BTTS rate of 80%. Both teams have scored in 0 of Haiti Women’s 0 home matches, and it has happened 4 times in 5 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets