Wuhan Zall 0 - 3 Shenzhen
20.09.2022 - 07:30
Finalizados
Escanteios
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 76% | 58% | 58% | 39% | 27% | 15% | 6% | 9.55 |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 70% | 58% | 58% | 33% | 21% | 18% | 12% | 9.52 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 76% | 64% | 52% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 9.3 |
| 4 |
Zhejiang |
33 | 61% | 48% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 15% | 12% | 9.15 |
| 5 |
Shandong Taishan |
33 | 70% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 9.07 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 67% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 21% | 12% | 6% | 9 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Port |
33 | 67% | 55% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9 |
| 8 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
33 | 67% | 55% | 42% | 33% | 21% | 12% | 3% | 9 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 64% | 48% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 8.97 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 61% | 48% | 39% | 30% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 8.94 |
| 11 |
Henan |
33 | 61% | 48% | 42% | 24% | 15% | 15% | 12% | 8.87 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 67% | 55% | 33% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 8.73 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 67% | 45% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 3% | 8.69 |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 55% | 52% | 42% | 27% | 12% | 9% | 6% | 8.57 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 55% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 8.37 |
| 16 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 67% | 39% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 8.31 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Tiger |
33 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 15% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 7.84 |
| 18 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
33 | 45% | 36% | 30% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 7.73 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 76% | 53% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9.35 |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 75% | 69% | 69% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 9.76 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 76% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 8.65 |
| 4 |
Zhejiang |
16 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 10.93 |
| 5 |
Shandong Taishan |
16 | 69% | 50% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 76% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 9.7 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Port |
16 | 69% | 44% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 7.69 |
| 8 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
16 | 69% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 9.63 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 56% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 31% | 9.38 |
| 11 |
Henan |
17 | 53% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.69 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 8.53 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 71% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 8.48 |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 50% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.44 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 63% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 9.06 |
| 16 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 63% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 8.47 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Tiger |
17 | 53% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.18 |
| 18 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
17 | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.18 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 19% | 6% | 9.75 |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 65% | 47% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 9.3 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 75% | 75% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 10 |
| 4 |
Zhejiang |
17 | 47% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 7.59 |
| 5 |
Shandong Taishan |
17 | 71% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 9.47 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 56% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Port |
17 | 65% | 65% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 10.31 |
| 8 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 8.82 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 63% | 44% | 38% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 8.31 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 65% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 11 |
Henan |
16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 9.07 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 75% | 56% | 31% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 8.94 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 63% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 8.94 |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 59% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 8.69 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.71 |
| 16 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 71% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 8.18 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Tiger |
16 | 56% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 18 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
16 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.31 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
31 | 65% | 39% | 29% | 19% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.39 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
31 | 65% | 26% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2.97 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
31 | 84% | 74% | 55% | 42% | 35% | 29% | 13% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
Henan |
31 | 81% | 74% | 58% | 29% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 4.84 |
| 5 |
Zhejiang |
31 | 84% | 65% | 55% | 35% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.56 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
31 | 87% | 74% | 58% | 45% | 42% | 26% | 10% | 5.44 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
31 | 29% | 23% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.09 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
31 | 74% | 68% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 4.36 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
31 | 97% | 87% | 77% | 48% | 35% | 29% | 23% | 6.38 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
31 | 42% | 32% | 26% | 19% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 2.91 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
31 | 71% | 58% | 45% | 29% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 3.79 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
31 | 71% | 55% | 39% | 26% | 13% | 10% | 3% | 4 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
31 | 103% | 81% | 71% | 48% | 32% | 26% | 16% | 5.58 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
31 | 68% | 55% | 42% | 26% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 3.91 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
31 | 84% | 52% | 35% | 16% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
31 | 81% | 65% | 52% | 35% | 16% | 13% | 6% | 4.63 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
31 | 90% | 77% | 52% | 35% | 32% | 29% | 23% | 5.64 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
31 | 87% | 81% | 71% | 52% | 39% | 32% | 16% | 5.64 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
17 | 59% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
16 | 69% | 63% | 44% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 6% | 4.5 |
| 4 |
Henan |
17 | 76% | 71% | 53% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.81 |
| 5 |
Zhejiang |
16 | 81% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 82% | 65% | 53% | 47% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6.13 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 25% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 88% | 82% | 53% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.71 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
16 | 88% | 75% | 69% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 5.93 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 44% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 3.38 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 75% | 69% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 4.56 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
17 | 59% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.59 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 100% | 76% | 71% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 5.59 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.24 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 71% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.35 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 81% | 69% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 88% | 81% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 6.13 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
16 | 81% | 81% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 5.81 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
16 | 63% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.25 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
17 | 88% | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6.5 |
| 4 |
Henan |
16 | 75% | 69% | 56% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 4.88 |
| 5 |
Zhejiang |
17 | 76% | 65% | 47% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 81% | 75% | 56% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 29% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 50% | 44% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 4 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
17 | 94% | 88% | 76% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 6.76 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 35% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2.44 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.06 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
16 | 75% | 56% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 4.47 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 94% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 5.56 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 69% | 56% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.67 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 88% | 56% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 4.06 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.75 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 82% | 65% | 41% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
17 | 82% | 71% | 71% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 5.47 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
31 | 97% | 87% | 71% | 42% | 29% | 23% | 19% | 5.61 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
31 | 81% | 71% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 19% | 13% | 4.76 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
31 | 61% | 45% | 29% | 26% | 10% | 10% | 6% | 3.5 |
| 4 |
Henan |
31 | 71% | 52% | 39% | 23% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 4.03 |
| 5 |
Zhejiang |
31 | 68% | 58% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 16% | 10% | 4.59 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
31 | 65% | 45% | 29% | 19% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 3.53 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
31 | 90% | 87% | 81% | 68% | 52% | 23% | 10% | 6.22 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
31 | 84% | 58% | 48% | 39% | 26% | 23% | 16% | 4.94 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
31 | 58% | 29% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
31 | 84% | 77% | 68% | 52% | 39% | 29% | 19% | 6.03 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
31 | 84% | 71% | 48% | 32% | 19% | 16% | 10% | 4.58 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
31 | 87% | 48% | 26% | 19% | 16% | 6% | 0% | 3.84 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
31 | 71% | 61% | 48% | 32% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 3.97 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
31 | 90% | 77% | 52% | 29% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.78 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
31 | 84% | 71% | 55% | 45% | 29% | 23% | 13% | 5.03 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
31 | 68% | 48% | 39% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
31 | 61% | 52% | 45% | 26% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.88 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
31 | 58% | 45% | 42% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.36 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 94% | 88% | 71% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 6.41 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
17 | 76% | 59% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.47 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
16 | 56% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.19 |
| 4 |
Henan |
17 | 59% | 29% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 3.88 |
| 5 |
Zhejiang |
16 | 69% | 63% | 56% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 5.73 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 81% | 81% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 19% | 13% | 6.27 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 71% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
16 | 56% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 75% | 69% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 6 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 4.5 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
17 | 82% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 3.59 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 65% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 100% | 76% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 5.24 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 76% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 50% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.63 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
16 | 56% | 50% | 44% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 4.75 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
16 | 75% | 75% | 69% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 5.06 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.81 |
| 4 |
Henan |
16 | 75% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.19 |
| 5 |
Zhejiang |
17 | 59% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 3.59 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.56 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 88% | 82% | 82% | 71% | 53% | 24% | 6% | 6.18 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 88% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 6 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
17 | 53% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 82% | 76% | 65% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 6.06 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 88% | 76% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 4.65 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
16 | 81% | 56% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 4.19 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 69% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.27 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 81% | 69% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 13% | 6% | 4.88 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 53% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.12 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Rongcheng |
17 | 53% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 3.35 |
Saber as média de escanteios para Wuhan Zall x Shenzhen pode fazer uma tremenda diferença para sua análise, principalmente se você gosta de esmiuçar números para entender como o jogo pode se desenrolar dentro dos 90 minutos.
Os jogos do Wuhan Zall tem, em média, 8.73 escanteios por jogo. Dessa média, 3.7 são a favor. Ou seja, com essa informação você pode saber qual é o poder ofensivo da equipe para este jogo.
Também vale destacar que Wuhan Zall concede ao adversário, em média, 5.03 por jogo.
Agora, falando de Shenzhen, a situação é a seguinte:
- Média de escanteios em jogos envolvendo Shenzhen: 8.69
- Média de cantos a favor: 3.91
- Média de escanteios concedidos: 4.78
Os escanteios representam oportunidades valiosas de marcar gols e desequilibrar uma partida. Ao examinar a média de escanteios para Wuhan Zall x Shenzhen, é possível avaliar a capacidade de criar jogadas ofensivas de ambos os clubes a partir dessa situação específica.
Além disso, as estatísticas de cantos (como alguns chamam os escanteios) também podem fornecer insights sobre a defesa de uma determinada equipe. Ao avaliar quantos escanteios uma equipe concede, é possível ter uma noção de sua solidez na zona defensiva e sua capacidade de evitar jogadas perigosas para o adversário.