Cangzhou Mighty Lions 0 - 0 Henan
27.04.2021 - 12:00
Estádio : Tianhe Stadium (Guangzhou (Canton))
Finalizados
Escanteios
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Shenzhen | 22 | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 10.81 |
| 2 |  Shanghai Port | 22 | 86% | 68% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 10.43 |
| 3 |  Qingdao Huanghai | 22 | 64% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 9.91 |
| 4 |  Beijing Guoan | 22 | 73% | 59% | 50% | 50% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.9 |
| 5 |  Hebei CFFC | 22 | 64% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.81 |
| 6 |  Guangzhou R&F | 22 | 68% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 14% | 14% | 9% | 9.52 |
| 7 |  Shandong Taishan | 22 | 77% | 68% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 8 |  Dalian Yifang | 22 | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 9.19 |
| 9 |  Changchun Yatai | 22 | 64% | 59% | 50% | 41% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 9.14 |
| 10 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 0% | 9 |
| 11 |  Wuhan Zall | 22 | 68% | 59% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 8.9 |
| 12 |  Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 22 | 64% | 50% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.68 |
| 13 |  Tianjin Tiger | 22 | 68% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 8.66 |
| 14 | Henan | 22 | 50% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 8.4 |
| 15 |  Guangzhou Evergrande | 22 | 55% | 41% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.34 |
| 16 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 22 | 45% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shenzhen | 11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 11.1 |
| 2 | Shanghai Port | 11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 10.2 |
| 3 | Qingdao Huanghai | 11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 10 |
| 4 | Beijing Guoan | 11 | 73% | 73% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 10.45 |
| 5 | Hebei CFFC | 11 | 82% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 11 |
| 6 | Guangzhou R&F | 11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.2 |
| 7 | Shandong Taishan | 11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 8 | Dalian Yifang | 11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 9 | Changchun Yatai | 11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 10 | Shanghai Shenhua | 11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 9.34 |
| 11 | Wuhan Zall | 11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 12 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.09 |
| 13 | Tianjin Tiger | 11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 14 | Henan | 11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 |
| 15 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 16 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 11 | 55% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.91 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shenzhen | 11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.55 |
| 2 | Shanghai Port | 11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 10.64 |
| 3 | Qingdao Huanghai | 11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.82 |
| 4 | Beijing Guoan | 11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.3 |
| 5 | Hebei CFFC | 11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 8.5 |
| 6 | Guangzhou R&F | 11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 10.73 |
| 7 | Shandong Taishan | 11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 10 |
| 8 | Dalian Yifang | 11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.1 |
| 9 | Changchun Yatai | 11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.91 |
| 10 | Shanghai Shenhua | 11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 11 | Wuhan Zall | 11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.18 |
| 12 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 11 | 73% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 13 | Tianjin Tiger | 11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 14 | Henan | 11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.1 |
| 15 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 11 | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.09 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 22 | 73% | 68% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 4.86 |
| 2 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 22 | 59% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port | 22 | 95% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 6.95 |
| 4 | Henan | 22 | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.14 |
| 6 | Hebei CFFC | 22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 7 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 22 | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.32 |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 9 | Shandong Taishan | 22 | 77% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 9% | 5.71 |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 22 | 50% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.57 |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 22 | 86% | 82% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.9 |
| 12 | Tianjin Tiger | 22 | 59% | 50% | 45% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 4.14 |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.38 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 22 | 91% | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 7.19 |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 22 | 77% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 5% | 3.95 |
| 16 | Qingdao Huanghai | 22 | 50% | 36% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.23 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 2 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port | 11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 6.8 |
| 4 | Henan | 11 | 82% | 82% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 6 | Hebei CFFC | 11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 7 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 9 | Shandong Taishan | 11 | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.18 |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 11 | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.2 |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5.67 |
| 12 | Tianjin Tiger | 11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 11 | 91% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 7.9 |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 11 | 91% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.64 |
| 16 | Qingdao Huanghai | 11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 2 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port | 11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 4 | Henan | 11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 6 | Hebei CFFC | 11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 7 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 9 | Shandong Taishan | 11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.3 |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 12 | Tianjin Tiger | 11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.4 |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 16 | Qingdao Huanghai | 11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 22 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 3.48 |
| 2 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 22 | 82% | 64% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port | 22 | 59% | 32% | 32% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.48 |
| 4 | Henan | 22 | 64% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 22 | 77% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 4.76 |
| 6 | Hebei CFFC | 22 | 91% | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 7 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 22 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.36 |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.38 |
| 9 | Shandong Taishan | 22 | 68% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 64% | 36% | 23% | 23% | 5.95 |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 22 | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 3.1 |
| 12 | Tianjin Tiger | 22 | 77% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 4.52 |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 22 | 55% | 45% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.81 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 22 | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 22 | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 16 | Qingdao Huanghai | 22 | 95% | 86% | 77% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 6.68 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.36 |
| 2 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port | 11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 4 | Henan | 11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 6 | Hebei CFFC | 11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.64 |
| 7 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.1 |
| 9 | Shandong Taishan | 11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.67 |
| 12 | Tianjin Tiger | 11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 11 | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 16 | Qingdao Huanghai | 11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 |
| 2 | Cangzhou Mighty Lions | 11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 3 | Shanghai Port | 11 | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.55 |
| 4 | Henan | 11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 6 | Hebei CFFC | 11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 7 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 9 | Shandong Taishan | 11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.82 |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
| 12 | Tianjin Tiger | 11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 5.91 |
| 16 | Qingdao Huanghai | 11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 7.27 |
Saber as média de escanteios para Cangzhou Mighty Lions x Henan pode fazer uma tremenda diferença para sua análise, principalmente se você gosta de esmiuçar números para entender como o jogo pode se desenrolar dentro dos 90 minutos.
Os jogos do Cangzhou Mighty Lions tem, em média, 7.5 escanteios por jogo. Dessa média, 3.32 são a favor. Ou seja, com essa informação você pode saber qual é o poder ofensivo da equipe para este jogo.
Também vale destacar que Cangzhou Mighty Lions concede ao adversário, em média, 4.18 por jogo.
Agora, falando de Henan, a situação é a seguinte:
- Média de escanteios em jogos envolvendo Henan: 8.4
- Média de cantos a favor: 3.45
- Média de escanteios concedidos: 4.95
Os escanteios representam oportunidades valiosas de marcar gols e desequilibrar uma partida. Ao examinar a média de escanteios para Cangzhou Mighty Lions x Henan, é possível avaliar a capacidade de criar jogadas ofensivas de ambos os clubes a partir dessa situação específica.
Além disso, as estatísticas de cantos (como alguns chamam os escanteios) também podem fornecer insights sobre a defesa de uma determinada equipe. Ao avaliar quantos escanteios uma equipe concede, é possível ter uma noção de sua solidez na zona defensiva e sua capacidade de evitar jogadas perigosas para o adversário.