Nantong Zhiyun 4 - 0 Shanghai Jiading
13.11.2022 - 01:30
Estádio: Jiangning Sports Center
Finalizados
Escanteios
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 65% | 56% | 47% | 38% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9.06 |
| 2 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 32% | 21% | 12% | 3% | 8.94 |
| 3 |
Kunshan |
34 | 62% | 56% | 44% | 35% | 21% | 9% | 6% | 8.79 |
| 4 |
Shenzhen |
34 | 56% | 41% | 38% | 35% | 21% | 18% | 12% | 8.7 |
| 5 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 59% | 56% | 41% | 32% | 21% | 15% | 3% | 8.63 |
| 6 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 62% | 53% | 38% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 6% | 8.62 |
| 7 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 53% | 47% | 41% | 32% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 8.55 |
| 8 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 59% | 50% | 38% | 26% | 21% | 6% | 0% | 8.44 |
| 9 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 56% | 41% | 29% | 26% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 8.37 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
34 | 53% | 44% | 29% | 26% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 8.25 |
| 11 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 56% | 47% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 8.14 |
| 12 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 47% | 41% | 29% | 26% | 12% | 6% | 3% | 8.03 |
| 13 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 41% | 35% | 32% | 24% | 18% | 9% | 3% | 7.84 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
34 | 50% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3% | 7.82 |
| 15 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 47% | 35% | 18% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.65 |
| 16 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 44% | 35% | 18% | 15% | 6% | 3% | 0% | 7.54 |
| 17 |
BIT |
34 | 38% | 35% | 29% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.44 |
| 18 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 35% | 26% | 21% | 12% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 6.92 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 71% | 71% | 59% | 53% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 9.23 |
| 2 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 59% | 59% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 9.3 |
| 3 |
Kunshan |
17 | 53% | 47% | 35% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 8.62 |
| 4 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 76% | 47% | 47% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 9.76 |
| 5 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 59% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 0% | 8.83 |
| 6 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 8.77 |
| 7 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 47% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 8.12 |
| 8 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 47% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.76 |
| 9 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 65% | 41% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 8.82 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
17 | 29% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 6.6 |
| 11 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 59% | 53% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 8.53 |
| 12 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 47% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.69 |
| 13 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 53% | 41% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 8.51 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 8.77 |
| 15 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 41% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 7.47 |
| 16 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 47% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 7.53 |
| 17 |
BIT |
17 | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6.88 |
| 18 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.36 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 59% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 8.88 |
| 2 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 59% | 47% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 8.56 |
| 3 |
Kunshan |
17 | 71% | 65% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 8.95 |
| 4 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 35% | 35% | 29% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 7.64 |
| 5 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 8.44 |
| 6 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 8.47 |
| 7 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 59% | 53% | 53% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 8.94 |
| 8 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 71% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 0% | 9.12 |
| 9 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 7.94 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
17 | 76% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 12% | 9.7 |
| 11 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 53% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 7.76 |
| 12 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 47% | 47% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 8.38 |
| 13 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 29% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 7.24 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
17 | 35% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 6.73 |
| 15 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.82 |
| 16 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.56 |
| 17 |
BIT |
17 | 41% | 41% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 8 |
| 18 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 7.47 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 62% | 38% | 24% | 12% | 9% | 9% | 6% | 3.48 |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 44% | 32% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.47 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
34 | 74% | 62% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 4.91 |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 47% | 21% | 21% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 0% | 2.41 |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 76% | 65% | 47% | 32% | 12% | 3% | 3% | 4.3 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 65% | 62% | 47% | 26% | 21% | 21% | 18% | 4.61 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 65% | 56% | 44% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 9% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 88% | 71% | 56% | 44% | 32% | 18% | 12% | 5.29 |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 53% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.18 |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 65% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 4.03 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 68% | 47% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 3% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 53% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3% | 3.39 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 76% | 62% | 53% | 24% | 12% | 9% | 6% | 4.47 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
34 | 79% | 68% | 56% | 47% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 5.41 |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 82% | 71% | 53% | 41% | 35% | 21% | 9% | 5.27 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 85% | 56% | 53% | 35% | 26% | 21% | 12% | 5 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 56% | 44% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 3% | 3.68 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
34 | 62% | 44% | 32% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 3% | 3.72 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 59% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.12 |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 41% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.47 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
17 | 82% | 71% | 71% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 5.53 |
| 4 |
BIT |
17 | 41% | 24% | 24% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.13 |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 76% | 76% | 65% | 41% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.88 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 65% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 4.56 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 65% | 59% | 53% | 53% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 5.24 |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 94% | 82% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 47% | 29% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.41 |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3.63 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 76% | 47% | 41% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 59% | 59% | 47% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.13 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 71% | 59% | 53% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 94% | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 35% | 24% | 6 |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
17 | 76% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 5.31 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 82% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 5.18 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.24 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
17 | 41% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 2.53 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 65% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.88 |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 47% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.47 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
17 | 65% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 4 |
BIT |
17 | 53% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 2.69 |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 76% | 53% | 29% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.69 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 65% | 65% | 53% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 4.65 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 65% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 82% | 59% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 4.88 |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 59% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 71% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.44 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 59% | 47% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.47 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 47% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 2.71 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 82% | 65% | 53% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 5.06 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 65% | 59% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 4.82 |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
17 | 88% | 76% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 5.24 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 88% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.81 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 65% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 4.12 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
17 | 82% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.76 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 82% | 68% | 53% | 47% | 26% | 24% | 12% | 5.15 |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 74% | 71% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 26% | 12% | 5.18 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
34 | 50% | 32% | 26% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 2.91 |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 71% | 62% | 50% | 38% | 26% | 15% | 15% | 5.03 |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 82% | 65% | 56% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 4.76 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 59% | 41% | 29% | 21% | 18% | 15% | 12% | 3.94 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 65% | 53% | 44% | 35% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 4.12 |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 47% | 32% | 21% | 15% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 2.85 |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 71% | 56% | 47% | 26% | 21% | 12% | 6% | 4.36 |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 62% | 53% | 41% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 3% | 4 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 71% | 50% | 44% | 35% | 26% | 24% | 12% | 4.7 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 76% | 53% | 44% | 29% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 4.45 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 65% | 53% | 50% | 26% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 3.97 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
34 | 65% | 38% | 26% | 15% | 12% | 3% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 65% | 53% | 29% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 3.52 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 68% | 53% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 3% | 3% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 62% | 44% | 26% | 15% | 6% | 3% | 0% | 3.24 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
34 | 68% | 44% | 38% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 15% | 4.53 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 88% | 71% | 59% | 59% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 5.71 |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 71% | 65% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 5 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
17 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.24 |
| 4 |
BIT |
17 | 71% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.75 |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 82% | 59% | 47% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.35 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 59% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.56 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 59% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 47% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 2.82 |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 76% | 71% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 5.12 |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 71% | 59% | 47% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 4.06 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 76% | 59% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 6% | 4.94 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 35% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 4.38 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 71% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
17 | 59% | 53% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.31 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 71% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.12 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 65% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.12 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
17 | 59% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 4.07 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 76% | 65% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.56 |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 76% | 76% | 65% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 6% | 5.35 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Hainiu |
17 | 41% | 29% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
| 4 |
BIT |
17 | 71% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 5.31 |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 82% | 71% | 65% | 41% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 5.19 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 59% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 4.29 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 71% | 65% | 59% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.71 |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 2.88 |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 65% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 53% | 47% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 65% | 41% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 4.47 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 82% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.53 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 59% | 53% | 53% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 4.06 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 59% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2.82 |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
17 | 71% | 53% | 35% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.71 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 65% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 3.35 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Gongfu |
17 | 76% | 47% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 29% | 24% | 4.94 |
Saber as média de escanteios para Nantong Zhiyun x Shanghai Jiading pode fazer uma tremenda diferença para sua análise, principalmente se você gosta de esmiuçar números para entender como o jogo pode se desenrolar dentro dos 90 minutos.
Os jogos do Nantong Zhiyun tem, em média, 8.14 escanteios por jogo. Dessa média, 5.29 são a favor. Ou seja, com essa informação você pode saber qual é o poder ofensivo da equipe para este jogo.
Também vale destacar que Nantong Zhiyun concede ao adversário, em média, 2.85 por jogo.
Agora, falando de Shanghai Jiading, a situação é a seguinte:
- Média de escanteios em jogos envolvendo Shanghai Jiading: 7.84
- Média de cantos a favor: 3.39
- Média de escanteios concedidos: 4.45
Os escanteios representam oportunidades valiosas de marcar gols e desequilibrar uma partida. Ao examinar a média de escanteios para Nantong Zhiyun x Shanghai Jiading, é possível avaliar a capacidade de criar jogadas ofensivas de ambos os clubes a partir dessa situação específica.
Além disso, as estatísticas de cantos (como alguns chamam os escanteios) também podem fornecer insights sobre a defesa de uma determinada equipe. Ao avaliar quantos escanteios uma equipe concede, é possível ter uma noção de sua solidez na zona defensiva e sua capacidade de evitar jogadas perigosas para o adversário.