Escanteios de Qingdao Huanghai
Informações do time
Temporada
2021
País
China
Competição
Escanteios
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 10.81 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Port |
22 | 86% | 68% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 10.43 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 9.91 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 73% | 59% | 50% | 50% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.9 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 64% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.81 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 68% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 14% | 14% | 9% | 9.52 |
| 7 |
Shandong Taishan |
22 | 77% | 68% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 50% | 41% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 9.14 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 0% | 9 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 68% | 59% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 8.9 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 64% | 50% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.68 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Tiger |
22 | 68% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 8.66 |
| 14 |
Henan |
22 | 50% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 8.4 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 55% | 41% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.34 |
| 16 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
22 | 45% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 11.1 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 10.2 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 10 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 73% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 10.45 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 11 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.2 |
| 7 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 9.34 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.09 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 14 |
Henan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 16 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 55% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.91 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.55 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 10.64 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.82 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.3 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 8.5 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 10.73 |
| 7 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 10 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.1 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.91 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.18 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 14 |
Henan |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.1 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.09 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 73% | 68% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 4.86 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
22 | 59% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
22 | 95% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 6.95 |
| 4 |
Henan |
22 | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.14 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.32 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
22 | 77% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 9% | 5.71 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 50% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.57 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 86% | 82% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.9 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
22 | 59% | 50% | 45% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 4.14 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.38 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 91% | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 7.19 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 77% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 5% | 3.95 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 50% | 36% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.23 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 6.8 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 82% | 82% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.18 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.2 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5.67 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 7.9 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 91% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.64 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.3 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.4 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 3.48 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
22 | 82% | 64% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
22 | 59% | 32% | 32% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.48 |
| 4 |
Henan |
22 | 64% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 77% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 4.76 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 91% | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.36 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.38 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
22 | 68% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 64% | 36% | 23% | 23% | 5.95 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 3.1 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
22 | 77% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 4.52 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 55% | 45% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.81 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 95% | 86% | 77% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 6.68 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.36 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.64 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.1 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.55 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.82 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 5.91 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 7.27 |
Estatísticas de Escanteios de Qingdao Huanghai
Outra estatística importante para analisar jogos de futebol são a quantidade de escanteios que uma equipe tem a favor e contra ao longo da competição. Esses dados podem revelar o quão agressivo é o ataque daquele time, além de mostrar se o sistema defensivo do clube em questão deixa o adversário fazer investidas ao ataque.
Aqui estão os principais números e médias de escanteios de Qingdao Huanghai no campeonato:
- Os jogos de Qingdao Huanghai têm uma média de 9.91 escanteios (entre escanteios conquistados e concedidos ao adversário).
- 55% das partidas de Qingdao Huanghai neste campeonato tiveram mais de 9.5 escanteios.
- Qingdao Huanghai tem uma média de 3.23 a favor nas partidas disputadas. Ou seja, esse é número de vezes que a equipe tem conquistado escanteios nos jogos que realizou até esse momento.
- Em 5% das ocasiões, Qingdao Huanghai teve 5 ou mais escanteios a favor em seus jogos.
- Quando o assunto são escanteios cedidos ao adversário, Qingdao Huanghai costuma conceder aos rivais uma média de 6.68 cantos por confronto.
Neste espaço também é possível ver as médias de escanteios de Qingdao Huanghai nos jogos dentro e fora de casa, assim como as taxas de over e under para escanteios a favor e contra.
Dessa forma, aqui você tem todas as estatísticas de escanteios de Qingdao Huanghai em SuperLiga Chinesa e, assim, pode analisar como o ataque e a defesa da equipe têm se comportado ao longo da competição.
Veja também as médias de escanteios de Qingdao Huanghai em outras competições alterando a competição no menu superior.
Vale lembrar que na APWin você pode conferir estatísticas de escanteios diariamente, onde é revelado os jogos com maiores probabilidades de acontecer escanteios no mundo todo.