Zhejiang Yiteng corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2018

China

Textile City Sports Center

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenzhen	30	73 %	63 %	53 %	37 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	10.85
2	Qingdao Huanghai	30	63 %	53 %	50 %	43 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	10.12
3	Hangzhou	30	57 %	47 %	33 %	30 %	20 %	17 %	13 %	9.08
4	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	30	63 %	50 %	37 %	17 %	17 %	10 %	7 %	9.04
5	Liaoning Kaixin	30	60 %	53 %	43 %	33 %	20 %	10 %	10 %	8.93
6	Dalian Transcendence	30	63 %	53 %	43 %	30 %	17 %	10 %	7 %	8.89
7	Meizhou Hakka	30	27 %	20 %	17 %	17 %	10 %	7 %	3 %	8.86
8	Yanbian Funde	30	53 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	8.85
9	Shanghai Shenxin	30	47 %	37 %	33 %	30 %	23 %	10 %	7 %	8.78
10	Beijing BG	30	57 %	43 %	30 %	20 %	13 %	10 %	7 %	8.73
11	Wuhan Zall	30	30 %	23 %	23 %	17 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.69
12	Xinjiang Tianshan	30	30 %	30 %	30 %	17 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.6
13	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	40 %	37 %	33 %	17 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	8.52
14	Zhejiang Yiteng	30	37 %	30 %	23 %	17 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.12
15	Meizhou Meixian Techand	30	33 %	27 %	10 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.58
16	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	30	27 %	20 %	13 %	3 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.74

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	15	20 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	11
2	Qingdao Huanghai	15	67 %	60 %	53 %	53 %	53 %	33 %	20 %	10.43
3	Hangzhou	15	73 %	53 %	53 %	53 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	10.43
4	Shenzhen	15	73 %	60 %	60 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	10.06
5	Wuhan Zall	15	13 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	10
6	Yanbian Funde	15	60 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	9.26
7	Shanghai Shenxin	15	67 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	9.2
8	Beijing BG	15	60 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.86
9	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	73 %	67 %	47 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.8
10	Meizhou Hakka	15	13 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	8.4
11	Zhejiang Yiteng	15	33 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.08
12	Meizhou Meixian Techand	15	33 %	33 %	13 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.89
13	Liaoning Kaixin	15	53 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	7.8
14	Dalian Transcendence	15	60 %	47 %	33 %	20 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	7.78
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	27 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	0 %	7.3
16	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	33 %	20 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.93

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenzhen	15	73 %	67 %	47 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	11.91
2	Liaoning Kaixin	15	67 %	67 %	60 %	47 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	10.33
3	Dalian Transcendence	15	67 %	60 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	10.08
4	Qingdao Huanghai	15	60 %	47 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	7 %	7 %	9.72
5	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	53 %	47 %	47 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	9.46
6	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	53 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	9.37
7	Meizhou Hakka	15	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	9.1
8	Beijing BG	15	53 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	8.58
9	Wuhan Zall	15	47 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.39
10	Yanbian Funde	15	47 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	0 %	8.27
11	Shanghai Shenxin	15	27 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	8.25
12	Zhejiang Yiteng	15	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.18
13	Xinjiang Tianshan	15	40 %	40 %	40 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	8
14	Hangzhou	15	40 %	40 %	13 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.5
15	Meizhou Meixian Techand	15	33 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.3
16	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	20 %	20 %	20 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.54

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenzhen	30	87%	77%	67%	57%	40%	33%	17%	6.77
3	Qingdao Huanghai	30	73%	70%	53%	47%	33%	20%	13%	6.04
4	Beijing BG	30	77%	60%	53%	37%	20%	17%	7%	5.27
5	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	30	73%	53%	40%	27%	20%	13%	7%	4.77
6	Hangzhou	30	70%	50%	33%	27%	17%	13%	7%	4.73
7	Wuhan Zall	30	37%	27%	23%	23%	17%	10%	10%	4.63
8	Yanbian Funde	30	63%	50%	40%	23%	20%	13%	10%	4.62
9	Liaoning Kaixin	30	70%	53%	40%	30%	17%	13%	10%	4.52
10	Meizhou Meixian Techand	30	50%	47%	27%	17%	10%	3%	0%	4.32
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	53%	43%	33%	20%	13%	7%	7%	4.26
12	Zhejiang Yiteng	30	70%	53%	23%	17%	10%	7%	0%	4.08
13	Dalian Transcendence	30	53%	40%	30%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.52
14	Shanghai Shenxin	30	53%	47%	30%	13%	7%	3%	3%	3.41
15	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	30	53%	33%	17%	10%	10%	0%	0%	3.12
16	Meizhou Hakka	30	23%	10%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.53
17	Xinjiang Tianshan	30	20%	13%	3%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.33

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Wuhan Zall	15	13%	13%	13%	13%	13%	13%	13%	7
3	Shenzhen	15	100%	93%	73%	60%	53%	40%	20%	6.93
4	Qingdao Huanghai	15	87%	80%	53%	53%	40%	33%	20%	6.64
5	Hangzhou	15	73%	53%	53%	47%	27%	20%	13%	5.64
6	Beijing BG	15	80%	60%	47%	40%	27%	27%	13%	5.43
7	Yanbian Funde	15	73%	60%	53%	33%	27%	20%	20%	5.13
8	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	87%	67%	47%	27%	27%	20%	7%	4.73
9	Meizhou Meixian Techand	15	53%	53%	33%	20%	7%	0%	0%	4.67
10	Xinjiang Tianshan	15	20%	20%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4.33
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	47%	47%	40%	20%	7%	0%	0%	4.3
12	Zhejiang Yiteng	15	73%	67%	33%	20%	7%	7%	0%	4.23
13	Liaoning Kaixin	15	80%	47%	27%	20%	7%	7%	7%	3.87
14	Shanghai Shenxin	15	60%	53%	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	3.8
15	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	60%	47%	27%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.62
16	Dalian Transcendence	15	53%	33%	27%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.21
17	Meizhou Hakka	15	13%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.6

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenzhen	15	73%	60%	60%	53%	27%	27%	13%	6.55
3	Liaoning Kaixin	15	60%	60%	53%	40%	27%	20%	13%	5.33
4	Qingdao Huanghai	15	60%	60%	53%	40%	27%	7%	7%	5.27
5	Beijing BG	15	73%	60%	60%	33%	13%	7%	0%	5.08
6	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	60%	40%	33%	27%	13%	7%	7%	4.82
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	60%	40%	27%	20%	20%	13%	13%	4.23
8	Wuhan Zall	15	60%	40%	33%	33%	20%	7%	7%	4.08
9	Meizhou Meixian Techand	15	47%	40%	20%	13%	13%	7%	0%	4
10	Yanbian Funde	15	53%	40%	27%	13%	13%	7%	0%	3.91
11	Zhejiang Yiteng	15	67%	40%	13%	13%	13%	7%	0%	3.91
12	Dalian Transcendence	15	53%	47%	33%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.85
13	Hangzhou	15	67%	47%	13%	7%	7%	7%	0%	3.67
14	Shanghai Shenxin	15	47%	40%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.92
15	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	47%	20%	7%	7%	7%	0%	0%	2.62
16	Meizhou Hakka	15	33%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
17	Xinjiang Tianshan	15	20%	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.83

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Meizhou Hakka	30	50%	43%	37%	17%	17%	13%	13%	6.33
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	30	43%	37%	33%	33%	27%	17%	13%	6.27
4	Shanghai Shenxin	30	70%	60%	47%	40%	30%	17%	10%	5.37
5	Dalian Transcendence	30	73%	67%	53%	47%	33%	23%	10%	5.37
6	Liaoning Kaixin	30	63%	57%	43%	37%	20%	10%	3%	4.41
7	Hangzhou	30	57%	57%	40%	20%	17%	17%	7%	4.35
8	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	30	60%	47%	33%	27%	23%	7%	7%	4.27
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	53%	47%	30%	23%	10%	10%	7%	4.26
10	Yanbian Funde	30	70%	43%	37%	30%	13%	7%	3%	4.23
11	Shenzhen	30	63%	43%	40%	20%	7%	7%	3%	4.08
12	Qingdao Huanghai	30	63%	50%	33%	17%	13%	7%	3%	4.08
13	Wuhan Zall	30	40%	37%	10%	7%	3%	3%	3%	4.06
14	Zhejiang Yiteng	30	53%	40%	23%	17%	10%	10%	7%	4.04
15	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	30	63%	40%	20%	17%	3%	0%	0%	3.62
16	Beijing BG	30	60%	37%	17%	10%	10%	7%	0%	3.46
17	Meizhou Meixian Techand	30	43%	23%	17%	7%	3%	0%	0%	3.26

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Xinjiang Tianshan	15	20%	20%	20%	20%	13%	0%	0%	6.67
3	Meizhou Hakka	15	33%	27%	27%	13%	13%	7%	7%	5.8
4	Shanghai Shenxin	15	73%	67%	53%	47%	40%	13%	13%	5.4
5	Hangzhou	15	67%	67%	47%	27%	27%	27%	13%	4.79
6	Dalian Transcendence	15	67%	60%	40%	40%	27%	20%	0%	4.57
7	Yanbian Funde	15	87%	47%	33%	33%	13%	7%	7%	4.13
8	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	60%	53%	47%	33%	27%	7%	7%	4.07
9	Liaoning Kaixin	15	67%	53%	33%	33%	13%	13%	7%	3.93
10	Zhejiang Yiteng	15	60%	40%	20%	13%	7%	7%	7%	3.85
11	Qingdao Huanghai	15	67%	47%	33%	20%	13%	7%	0%	3.79
12	Beijing BG	15	73%	33%	13%	7%	7%	7%	0%	3.43
13	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	60%	27%	13%	13%	0%	0%	0%	3.31
14	Meizhou Meixian Techand	15	33%	27%	20%	7%	7%	0%	0%	3.22
15	Shenzhen	15	60%	40%	33%	7%	0%	0%	0%	3.13
16	Wuhan Zall	15	13%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
17	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	40%	33%	13%	7%	0%	0%	0%	3

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Meizhou Hakka	15	67%	60%	47%	20%	20%	20%	20%	6.6
3	Dalian Transcendence	15	80%	73%	67%	53%	40%	27%	20%	6.23
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	15	67%	53%	47%	47%	40%	33%	27%	6.17
5	Shenzhen	15	67%	47%	47%	33%	13%	13%	7%	5.36
6	Shanghai Shenxin	15	67%	53%	40%	33%	20%	20%	7%	5.33
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	67%	60%	47%	40%	20%	20%	13%	5.23
8	Liaoning Kaixin	15	60%	60%	53%	40%	27%	7%	0%	5
9	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	60%	40%	20%	20%	20%	7%	7%	4.55
10	Qingdao Huanghai	15	60%	53%	33%	13%	13%	7%	7%	4.45
11	Yanbian Funde	15	53%	40%	40%	27%	13%	7%	0%	4.36
12	Wuhan Zall	15	67%	60%	20%	13%	7%	7%	7%	4.31
13	Zhejiang Yiteng	15	47%	40%	27%	20%	13%	13%	7%	4.27
14	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	67%	53%	27%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.92
15	Hangzhou	15	47%	47%	33%	13%	7%	7%	0%	3.83
16	Beijing BG	15	47%	40%	20%	13%	13%	7%	0%	3.5
17	Meizhou Meixian Techand	15	53%	20%	13%	7%	0%	0%	0%	3.3

Zhejiang Yiteng corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Zhejiang Yiteng’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the China League 1:

Zhejiang Yiteng games have an average of 8.12 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
23% of Zhejiang Yiteng’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Zhejiang Yiteng has an average of 4.08 corners won per game this season.
On 17% of occasions, Zhejiang Yiteng had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Zhejiang Yiteng usually concedes an average of 4.04 corners per match.

You can also check out Zhejiang Yiteng’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.