 
                    Season
Country
2017
China
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 10% | 7% | 7% | 
| 2 |   Hangzhou | 30 | 13% | 10% | 3% | 
| 3 |   Beijing Renhe | 30 | 10% | 7% | 3% | 
| 4 |   Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 10% | 7% | 7% | 
| 5 |   Zhejiang Yiteng | 30 | 7% | 3% | 3% | 
| 6 |   Dalian Yifang | 30 | 7% | 7% | 7% | 
| 7 |   Shenzhen | 30 | 17% | 10% | 7% | 
| 8 |   Wuhan Zall | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 9 |   Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 10 |   Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 7% | 3% | 3% | 
| 11 |   Beijing BG | 30 | 7% | 3% | 3% | 
| 12 |   Yunnan Lijiang | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 13 |   Baoding Yingli Yitong | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 14 |   Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 7% | 7% | 7% | 
| 15 |   Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 10% | 10% | 10% | 
| 16 |   Dalian Transcendence | 30 | 10% | 7% | 7% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 10% | 10% | 10% | 
| 2 |   Hangzhou | 30 | 10% | 3% | 3% | 
| 3 |   Beijing Renhe | 30 | 7% | 3% | 0% | 
| 4 |   Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 7% | 3% | 0% | 
| 5 |   Zhejiang Yiteng | 30 | 7% | 3% | 3% | 
| 6 |   Dalian Yifang | 30 | 10% | 7% | 3% | 
| 7 |   Shenzhen | 30 | 17% | 17% | 7% | 
| 8 |   Wuhan Zall | 30 | 7% | 3% | 0% | 
| 9 |   Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 3% | 3% | 0% | 
| 10 |   Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 11 |   Beijing BG | 30 | 13% | 3% | 0% | 
| 12 |   Yunnan Lijiang | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 13 |   Baoding Yingli Yitong | 30 | 7% | 0% | 0% | 
| 14 |   Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 7% | 7% | 7% | 
| 15 |   Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 10% | 10% | 0% | 
| 16 |   Dalian Transcendence | 30 | 10% | 7% | 3% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 7% | 3% | 3% | 
| 2 |   Hangzhou | 30 | 13% | 7% | 3% | 
| 3 |   Beijing Renhe | 30 | 10% | 7% | 3% | 
| 4 |   Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 13% | 13% | 7% | 
| 5 |   Zhejiang Yiteng | 30 | 7% | 0% | 0% | 
| 6 |   Dalian Yifang | 30 | 7% | 7% | 3% | 
| 7 |   Shenzhen | 30 | 7% | 7% | 7% | 
| 8 |   Wuhan Zall | 30 | 7% | 3% | 3% | 
| 9 |   Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 3% | 3% | 0% | 
| 10 |   Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 10% | 3% | 0% | 
| 11 |   Beijing BG | 30 | 10% | 3% | 0% | 
| 12 |   Yunnan Lijiang | 30 | 3% | 3% | 0% | 
| 13 |   Baoding Yingli Yitong | 30 | 3% | 3% | 3% | 
| 14 |   Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 10% | 7% | 0% | 
| 15 |   Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 10% | 10% | 7% | 
| 16 |   Dalian Transcendence | 30 | 10% | 7% | 3% | 
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Yunnan Lijiang’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 3% of their games played so far in the China League One 2017.
And on the other side of the ball, Yunnan Lijiang’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 3% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Yunnan Lijiang this season in the China League 1:
You can follow the Yunnan Lijiang’s card situation in Chinese Division 1 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.