Football statistics for Viettel
Team Info
Season
Country
2025/26
Vietnam
Competition
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong |
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.25 |
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
7 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 9.43 |
| 3 |
Da Nang |
8 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 9.25 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh |
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 9.13 |
| 5 |
Phu Dong |
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 9.13 |
| 6 |
Ha Noi |
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 9.01 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong |
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND |
8 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.13 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II |
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.88 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
8 | 63% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.88 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
7 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7.72 |
| 14 |
Viettel |
8 | 75% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.88 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9.8 |
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 3 |
Da Nang |
3 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh |
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 9.6 |
| 5 |
Phu Dong |
3 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.33 |
| 6 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 10.75 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.75 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND |
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.75 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II |
3 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.33 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
5 | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 8 |
| 14 |
Viettel |
4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.66 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong |
3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11 |
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 9.5 |
| 3 |
Da Nang |
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 10 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh |
3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.33 |
| 5 |
Phu Dong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10.8 |
| 6 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.75 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND |
3 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.33 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II |
5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.2 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.33 |
| 14 |
Viettel |
4 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.75 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
5 | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
8 | 88% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
8 | 100% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5.25 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
8 | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.25 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
8 | 88% | 88% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 6.13 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
7 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
8 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 5.38 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
8 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
7 | 57% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 4.29 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
8 | 100% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
8 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
5 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.33 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 7.75 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 4.25 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
3 | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
5 | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
5 | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
8 | 88% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
8 | 88% | 75% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
8 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 7 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
7 | 100% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 6 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
8 | 75% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
7 | 86% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
8 | 88% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
8 | 88% | 88% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.38 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
8 | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.63 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.33 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
4 | 75% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
5 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.33 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 8.4 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 6.5 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
3 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.25 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 6 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
Viettel corner statistics
The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.
Here are the Viettel’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Vietnam V League 1:
- Viettel games have an average of 7.5 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
- 0% of Viettel’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
- Viettel has an average of 4.75 corners won per game this season.
- On 25% of occasions, Viettel had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
- Regarding corners given up, Viettel usually concedes an average of 2.75 corners per match.
You can also check out Viettel’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.
And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.