Football statistics for Whitecaps II
Team Info
Season
Country
2017
USA
Competition
Clean Sheet
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| 2 |
Ottawa Fury |
32 | 7 | 22% |
| 3 |
Phoenix Rising |
33 | 9 | 27% |
| 4 |
Penn FC |
32 | 9 | 28% |
| 5 |
Toronto II |
32 | 9 | 28% |
| 6 |
Tacoma Defiance |
32 | 5 | 16% |
| 7 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
33 | 10 | 30% |
| 8 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
32 | 8 | 25% |
| 9 |
OKC Energy |
35 | 11 | 31% |
| 10 |
LA Galaxy II |
32 | 4 | 13% |
| 11 |
Sacramento Republic |
34 | 7 | 21% |
| 12 |
Reno 1868 |
33 | 10 | 30% |
| 13 |
FC Cincinnati |
33 | 7 | 21% |
| 14 |
Philadelphia Union II |
33 | 6 | 18% |
| 15 |
Rio Grande Valley |
32 | 7 | 22% |
| 16 |
Charleston Battery |
33 | 13 | 39% |
| 17 |
Charlotte Independence |
33 | 6 | 18% |
| 18 |
New York RB II |
35 | 7 | 20% |
| 19 |
Colorado Springs |
32 | 7 | 22% |
| 20 |
Louisville City |
36 | 15 | 42% |
| 21 |
Real Monarchs |
33 | 11 | 33% |
| 22 |
Saint Louis |
32 | 8 | 25% |
| 23 |
Richmond Kickers |
32 | 7 | 22% |
| 24 |
Portland Timbers II |
32 | 4 | 13% |
| 25 |
Orange County |
32 | 7 | 22% |
| 26 |
San Antonio |
34 | 15 | 44% |
| 27 |
Sporting KC II |
36 | 13 | 36% |
| 28 |
Whitecaps II |
32 | 5 | 16% |
| 29 |
Orlando City II |
32 | 11 | 34% |
| 30 |
Rochester Rhinos |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
18 | 11 | 61% |
| 2 |
Ottawa Fury |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 3 |
Phoenix Rising |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 4 |
Penn FC |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 5 |
Toronto II |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 6 |
Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 7 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 8 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 9 |
OKC Energy |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| 10 |
LA Galaxy II |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 11 |
Sacramento Republic |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 12 |
Reno 1868 |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 13 |
FC Cincinnati |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 14 |
Philadelphia Union II |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 15 |
Rio Grande Valley |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 16 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 17 |
Charlotte Independence |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 18 |
New York RB II |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 19 |
Colorado Springs |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 20 |
Louisville City |
20 | 10 | 50% |
| 21 |
Real Monarchs |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 22 |
Saint Louis |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 23 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 24 |
Portland Timbers II |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 25 |
Orange County |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 26 |
San Antonio |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 27 |
Sporting KC II |
19 | 7 | 37% |
| 28 |
Whitecaps II |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 29 |
Orlando City II |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 30 |
Rochester Rhinos |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 2 |
Ottawa Fury |
16 | 1 | 6% |
| 3 |
Phoenix Rising |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 4 |
Penn FC |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 5 |
Toronto II |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 6 |
Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 7 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 8 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 9 |
OKC Energy |
19 | 2 | 11% |
| 10 |
LA Galaxy II |
16 | 1 | 6% |
| 11 |
Sacramento Republic |
18 | 2 | 11% |
| 12 |
Reno 1868 |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 13 |
FC Cincinnati |
17 | 2 | 12% |
| 14 |
Philadelphia Union II |
17 | 3 | 18% |
| 15 |
Rio Grande Valley |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 16 |
Charleston Battery |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 17 |
Charlotte Independence |
17 | 2 | 12% |
| 18 |
New York RB II |
19 | 2 | 11% |
| 19 |
Colorado Springs |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 20 |
Louisville City |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 21 |
Real Monarchs |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 22 |
Saint Louis |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 23 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 24 |
Portland Timbers II |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 25 |
Orange County |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 26 |
San Antonio |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 27 |
Sporting KC II |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 28 |
Whitecaps II |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 29 |
Orlando City II |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 30 |
Rochester Rhinos |
17 | 5 | 29% |
Whitecaps II Clean Sheet Statistics
Whitecaps II’s clean sheet statistics are key to gauging a team’s defensive performance in the USL Championship 2017. The number of matches a team completely prevents their opponents from scoring helps to make a more accurate evaluation of the defence’s overall ability during the season.
See below some data on the number of games without conceding for Whitecaps II thus far this season:
- In 32 matches played in the championship, Whitecaps II has had 5 matches without conceding a single goal. That means their defence has not been breached by their opponents in 16% of their matches this season.
- Whitecaps II has kept a clean sheet in 2 of the 16 matches played at home so far this season.
- Meanwhile, Whitecaps II has played 16 times away from home and has kept a clean sheet 3 times.
Visit this page all season long to stay up to date with all of Whitecaps II's current clean sheet statistics, whether at home, away from home, or overall. Also, check out the latest football trends for today.