1st Half
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
25 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 28 | 9 | +19 | 45 | 1.96 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
23 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 31 | 1.48 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
26 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 15 | 6 | +9 | 39 | 1.56 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
20 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 14 | 0.74 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
22 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 27 | 1.35 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 25 | 1.14 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 4 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 23 | 1.15 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
23 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 8 | 27 | -19 | 11 | 0.55 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
13 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 19 | 2.11 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
14 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 2 | +8 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
11 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 6 | 0.55 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
12 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 14 | 1.27 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 | 1.75 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
11 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 12 | 1.2 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
11 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 5 | 0.5 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
12 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 5 | +11 | 23 | 2.09 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 12 | 1 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
12 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 8 | 1 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
10 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 11 | 1 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 1 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
12 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 11 | 1.1 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
12 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 6 | 0.6 |
Performance in the 1st half: Valley United - 2022
It can be quite helpful to take a closer look at a team’s performance only in the first half of football games. Whether it’s the tactics of the coach or the comparison of their performance with other teams, they provide a glimpse into their overall play.
So if we only look at the first half of the match, we can see how Valley United has performed compared to other teams in the NISA in terms of their initial tactics over the first 45 minutes.
Below are some deeper insights on how Valley United has played in the 1st half of their games in NISA 2022:
- Taking into account only the first 45 minutes of the matches played, in 0 games so far, Valley United has won 0 games in the first half, drew 0, and lost 0 matches.
- As a result, Valley United is ranked 10th in the competition based on their performance in the first half of games.
- And in terms of points per match, if we analyse just the first 45 minutes of all the matches played, Valley United would be averaging 0 points per match in this championship.
You can also check out Valley United’s first half statistics for both home and away matches in the NISA 2022.