Season
2021/22
Country
Spain
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() UD Villa de Santa Brígida |
32 | 17 | 53% |
2 |
![]() SD Tenisca |
32 | 17 | 53% |
3 |
![]() UD Lanzarote |
32 | 12 | 38% |
4 |
![]() CD Marino |
32 | 9 | 28% |
5 |
![]() Unión Viera |
32 | 10 | 31% |
6 |
![]() Las Zocas |
32 | 9 | 28% |
7 |
![]() Santa Úrsula |
32 | 14 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Unión Sur Yaiza |
32 | 13 | 41% |
9 |
![]() Buzanada |
32 | 13 | 41% |
10 |
![]() La Cuadra |
32 | 17 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Las Palmas III |
32 | 13 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Tenerife II |
32 | 14 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Atlético Paso |
32 | 11 | 34% |
14 |
![]() Vera |
32 | 9 | 28% |
15 |
![]() Gran Tarajal |
32 | 15 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Arucas CF |
32 | 10 | 31% |
17 |
![]() Herbania |
32 | 9 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() UD Villa de Santa Brígida |
16 | 8 | 50% |
2 |
![]() SD Tenisca |
16 | 9 | 56% |
3 |
![]() UD Lanzarote |
16 | 3 | 19% |
4 |
![]() CD Marino |
16 | 4 | 25% |
5 |
![]() Unión Viera |
16 | 5 | 31% |
6 |
![]() Las Zocas |
16 | 5 | 31% |
7 |
![]() Santa Úrsula |
16 | 7 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Unión Sur Yaiza |
16 | 6 | 38% |
9 |
![]() Buzanada |
16 | 10 | 63% |
10 |
![]() La Cuadra |
16 | 8 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Las Palmas III |
16 | 7 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Tenerife II |
16 | 7 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Atlético Paso |
16 | 5 | 31% |
14 |
![]() Vera |
16 | 4 | 25% |
15 |
![]() Gran Tarajal |
16 | 8 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Arucas CF |
16 | 3 | 19% |
17 |
![]() Herbania |
16 | 7 | 44% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() UD Villa de Santa Brígida |
16 | 9 | 56% |
2 |
![]() SD Tenisca |
16 | 8 | 50% |
3 |
![]() UD Lanzarote |
16 | 9 | 56% |
4 |
![]() CD Marino |
16 | 5 | 31% |
5 |
![]() Unión Viera |
16 | 5 | 31% |
6 |
![]() Las Zocas |
16 | 4 | 25% |
7 |
![]() Santa Úrsula |
16 | 7 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Unión Sur Yaiza |
16 | 7 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Buzanada |
16 | 3 | 19% |
10 |
![]() La Cuadra |
16 | 9 | 56% |
11 |
![]() Las Palmas III |
16 | 6 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Tenerife II |
16 | 7 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Atlético Paso |
16 | 6 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Vera |
16 | 5 | 31% |
15 |
![]() Gran Tarajal |
16 | 7 | 44% |
16 |
![]() Arucas CF |
16 | 7 | 44% |
17 |
![]() Herbania |
16 | 2 | 13% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Las Palmas III’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Tercera Group 12 2021/2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Las Palmas III in the competition:
You can also see Las Palmas III’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.