Season
Country
2019
China
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Liaoning Kaixin |
30 | 60% | 33% | 23% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 47% | 27% | 23% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
30 | 60% | 47% | 37% |
| 4 |
Changchun Yatai |
30 | 67% | 43% | 27% |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 40% | 27% | 17% |
| 6 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 80% | 67% | 47% |
| 7 |
Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 27% | 23% | 13% |
| 8 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 37% | 20% | 10% |
| 9 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 30% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 57% | 43% | 30% |
| 11 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 50% | 33% | 23% |
| 12 |
Meizhou Meixian Techand |
30 | 53% | 30% | 13% |
| 13 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
30 | 47% | 33% | 23% |
| 14 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
30 | 57% | 43% | 27% |
| 15 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
30 | 50% | 33% | 20% |
| 16 |
Sichuan Longfor |
30 | 53% | 27% | 10% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Liaoning Kaixin |
30 | 57% | 23% | 13% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 47% | 27% | 17% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
30 | 67% | 47% | 17% |
| 4 |
Changchun Yatai |
30 | 50% | 20% | 7% |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 40% | 27% | 7% |
| 6 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 77% | 43% | 30% |
| 7 |
Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 40% | 27% | 20% |
| 8 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 50% | 27% | 3% |
| 9 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 43% | 7% | 0% |
| 10 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 63% | 53% | 27% |
| 11 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 70% | 27% | 7% |
| 12 |
Meizhou Meixian Techand |
30 | 53% | 30% | 3% |
| 13 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
30 | 60% | 30% | 3% |
| 14 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
30 | 67% | 47% | 27% |
| 15 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
30 | 50% | 37% | 13% |
| 16 |
Sichuan Longfor |
30 | 63% | 23% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Liaoning Kaixin |
30 | 63% | 37% | 23% |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 57% | 27% | 10% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
30 | 60% | 43% | 13% |
| 4 |
Changchun Yatai |
30 | 73% | 50% | 30% |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 47% | 20% | 7% |
| 6 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 87% | 60% | 23% |
| 7 |
Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 23% | 10% | 3% |
| 8 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 47% | 27% | 3% |
| 9 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 53% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 53% | 17% | 10% |
| 11 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 57% | 30% | 20% |
| 12 |
Meizhou Meixian Techand |
30 | 47% | 33% | 20% |
| 13 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
30 | 50% | 33% | 13% |
| 14 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
30 | 50% | 30% | 17% |
| 15 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
30 | 67% | 37% | 7% |
| 16 |
Sichuan Longfor |
30 | 63% | 23% | 3% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Sichuan Longfor’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 23% of their games played so far in the China League One 2019.
And on the other side of the ball, Sichuan Longfor’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 63% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Sichuan Longfor this season in the China League 1:
You can follow the Sichuan Longfor’s card situation in Chinese Division 1 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.