Season
Country
2025/26
Belgium
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
10 | 60% | 30% | 10% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
10 | 70% | 60% | 40% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
10 | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
9 | 78% | 22% | 22% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
10 | 50% | 50% | 40% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
9 | 100% | 67% | 44% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
10 | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
10 | 50% | 40% | 30% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
9 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
| 12 |
Olympic Charleroi |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 100% | 89% | 78% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% |
| 17 |
KAA Gent II |
9 | 56% | 22% | 11% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
10 | 50% | 20% | 10% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
10 | 70% | 60% | 20% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
10 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
9 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
9 | 78% | 22% | 11% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
10 | 50% | 10% | 10% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
10 | 50% | 40% | 20% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
9 | 78% | 33% | 33% |
| 12 |
Olympic Charleroi |
9 | 78% | 56% | 22% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 89% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
9 | 67% | 22% | 11% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
9 | 67% | 56% | 22% |
| 17 |
KAA Gent II |
9 | 44% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
10 | 70% | 30% | 10% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
10 | 70% | 30% | 10% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
9 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
10 | 80% | 40% | 20% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
9 | 100% | 89% | 56% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
10 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
9 | 78% | 11% | 11% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
10 | 80% | 30% | 30% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
10 | 60% | 30% | 30% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
9 | 33% | 11% | 0% |
| 12 |
Olympic Charleroi |
9 | 56% | 33% | 11% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
9 | 78% | 33% | 22% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 89% | 67% | 56% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
9 | 44% | 22% | 11% |
| 17 |
KAA Gent II |
9 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Francs Borains’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 56% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, Francs Borains’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 78% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Francs Borains this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the Francs Borains’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.