Season
Country
Stadium
2025/26
Belgium
Stade de Rocourt
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Waasland-Beveren |
10 | 60% | 30% | 10% |
2 |
![]() AS Eupen |
10 | 70% | 60% | 40% |
3 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
10 | 40% | 20% | 20% |
4 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
9 | 78% | 22% | 22% |
5 |
![]() Lommel United |
10 | 50% | 50% | 40% |
6 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
9 | 100% | 67% | 44% |
7 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% |
8 |
![]() Francs Borains |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% |
9 |
![]() RFC Liege |
10 | 60% | 40% | 40% |
10 |
![]() Lierse Kempenzonen |
10 | 50% | 40% | 30% |
11 |
![]() RWDM |
9 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
12 |
![]() Olympic Charleroi |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% |
13 |
![]() Club Brugge II |
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% |
14 |
![]() Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 100% | 89% | 78% |
15 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht II |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% |
16 |
![]() KRC Genk II |
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% |
17 |
![]() KAA Gent II |
9 | 56% | 22% | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Waasland-Beveren |
10 | 50% | 20% | 10% |
2 |
![]() AS Eupen |
10 | 70% | 60% | 20% |
3 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
10 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
9 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Lommel United |
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% |
6 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
9 | 78% | 22% | 11% |
7 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% |
8 |
![]() Francs Borains |
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% |
9 |
![]() RFC Liege |
10 | 50% | 10% | 10% |
10 |
![]() Lierse Kempenzonen |
10 | 50% | 40% | 20% |
11 |
![]() RWDM |
9 | 78% | 33% | 33% |
12 |
![]() Olympic Charleroi |
9 | 78% | 56% | 22% |
13 |
![]() Club Brugge II |
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% |
14 |
![]() Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 89% | 67% | 67% |
15 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht II |
9 | 67% | 22% | 11% |
16 |
![]() KRC Genk II |
9 | 67% | 56% | 22% |
17 |
![]() KAA Gent II |
9 | 44% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Waasland-Beveren |
10 | 70% | 30% | 10% |
2 |
![]() AS Eupen |
10 | 70% | 30% | 10% |
3 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
4 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
9 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
5 |
![]() Lommel United |
10 | 80% | 40% | 20% |
6 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
9 | 100% | 89% | 56% |
7 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
10 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Francs Borains |
9 | 78% | 11% | 11% |
9 |
![]() RFC Liege |
10 | 80% | 30% | 30% |
10 |
![]() Lierse Kempenzonen |
10 | 60% | 30% | 30% |
11 |
![]() RWDM |
9 | 33% | 11% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Olympic Charleroi |
9 | 56% | 33% | 11% |
13 |
![]() Club Brugge II |
9 | 78% | 33% | 22% |
14 |
![]() Lokeren-Temse |
9 | 89% | 67% | 56% |
15 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht II |
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% |
16 |
![]() KRC Genk II |
9 | 44% | 22% | 11% |
17 |
![]() KAA Gent II |
9 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of RFC Liege’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 10% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, RFC Liege’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 80% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for RFC Liege this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the RFC Liege’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.