Football statistics for Qingdao Red Lions
Team Info
Season
2025
Country
China
Competition
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 8 | 53% | 63% | 43% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 5 | 31% | 38% | 25% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 9 | 60% | 50% | 71% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 7 | 44% | 56% | 29% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 5 | 33% | 0% | 56% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 7 | 44% | 38% | 50% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 7 | 44% | 44% | 43% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 7 | 44% | 38% | 50% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 9 | 60% | 50% | 71% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 11 | 69% | 71% | 67% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 7 | 47% | 43% | 50% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 9 | 60% | 71% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 14 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 13 | 87% | 88% | 86% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 11 | 73% | 50% | 89% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 14 | 93% | 88% | 100% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 89% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 14 | 93% | 86% | 100% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 13 | 87% | 100% | 75% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 12 | 80% | 75% | 86% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 12 | 80% | 75% | 86% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 12 | 75% | 78% | 71% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 10 | 67% | 50% | 78% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 13 | 81% | 89% | 71% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 11 | 69% | 63% | 75% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 12 | 80% | 75% | 86% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 78% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 13 | 87% | 86% | 88% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 12 | 80% | 86% | 75% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 5 | 33% | 50% | 14% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 4 | 25% | 38% | 13% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 3 | 20% | 25% | 14% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 3 | 19% | 22% | 14% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 3 | 20% | 0% | 33% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 3 | 19% | 22% | 14% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 5 | 33% | 13% | 57% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 5 | 31% | 29% | 33% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 5 | 33% | 43% | 25% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 5 | 33% | 57% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 1 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 1 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 1 | 7% | 0% | 11% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 3 | 20% | 0% | 43% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 4 | 25% | 14% | 33% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 3 | 20% | 29% | 13% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 3 | 20% | 29% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 1 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 3 | 20% | 0% | 43% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 2 | 13% | 14% | 11% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 2 | 13% | 14% | 13% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 1 | 7% | 0% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 7 | 47% | 38% | 57% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 11 | 69% | 63% | 75% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 6 | 40% | 50% | 29% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 9 | 56% | 44% | 71% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 10 | 67% | 100% | 44% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 9 | 56% | 63% | 50% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 9 | 56% | 56% | 57% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 9 | 56% | 63% | 50% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 6 | 40% | 50% | 29% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 5 | 31% | 29% | 33% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 8 | 53% | 57% | 50% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 6 | 40% | 29% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 1 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 14% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 4 | 27% | 50% | 11% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 1 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 1 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 3 | 20% | 25% | 14% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 3 | 20% | 25% | 14% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 4 | 25% | 22% | 29% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 5 | 33% | 50% | 22% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 3 | 19% | 11% | 29% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 5 | 31% | 38% | 25% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 3 | 20% | 25% | 14% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 22% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 2 | 13% | 14% | 13% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 3 | 20% | 14% | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 10 | 67% | 50% | 86% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 12 | 75% | 63% | 88% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 12 | 80% | 75% | 86% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 13 | 81% | 78% | 86% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 12 | 80% | 100% | 67% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 13 | 81% | 78% | 86% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 10 | 67% | 88% | 43% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 11 | 69% | 71% | 67% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 10 | 67% | 57% | 75% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 10 | 67% | 43% | 88% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 14 | 93% | 88% | 100% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 14 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 14 | 93% | 100% | 89% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 12 | 80% | 100% | 57% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 12 | 75% | 86% | 67% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 12 | 80% | 71% | 88% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 12 | 80% | 71% | 88% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 14 | 93% | 88% | 100% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 12 | 80% | 100% | 57% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 14 | 88% | 86% | 89% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 13 | 87% | 86% | 88% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
15 | 14 | 93% | 100% | 88% |
Average goals scored and conceded: Qingdao Red Lions
Knowing Qingdao Red Lions’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the China League One 2025 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the Qingdao Red Lions’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
- 13% of Qingdao Red Lions games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Qingdao Red Lions and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 87%.
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in China League One.
All of this information can help determine how Qingdao Red Lions’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.