 
                    Season
Country
Venue
2025
Finland
Pihlajamäki TN
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   JJK | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 2 |   RoPS | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 
| 3 |   Lahti | 27 | 74% | 67% | 59% | 
| 4 |   TPS | 27 | 63% | 44% | 26% | 
| 5 |   KPV | 7 | 43% | 29% | 14% | 
| 6 |   EIF | 27 | 67% | 37% | 22% | 
| 7 |   Jazz | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 8 |   MP | 7 | 43% | 14% | 14% | 
| 9 |   JIPPO | 27 | 63% | 41% | 26% | 
| 10 |   Klubi-04 | 27 | 56% | 44% | 26% | 
| 11 |   JäPS | 27 | 44% | 26% | 15% | 
| 12 |   SJK Akatemia | 27 | 48% | 30% | 19% | 
| 13 |   Tampere United | 7 | 29% | 0% | 0% | 
| 14 |   KäPa | 27 | 41% | 33% | 19% | 
| 15 |   SalPa | 27 | 56% | 37% | 26% | 
| 16 |   OLS | 6 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 
| 17 |   PKKU | 6 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 
| 18 |   Atlantis | 7 | 14% | 14% | 14% | 
| 19 |   EPS | 7 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 
| 20 |   Inter Turku II | 6 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 21 |   PK-35 | 27 | 52% | 33% | 22% | 
| 22 |   KuPS Akatemia | 7 | 29% | 0% | 0% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   JJK | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 2 |   RoPS | 6 | 50% | 33% | 0% | 
| 3 |   Lahti | 27 | 70% | 56% | 33% | 
| 4 |   TPS | 27 | 48% | 19% | 7% | 
| 5 |   KPV | 7 | 71% | 29% | 14% | 
| 6 |   EIF | 27 | 63% | 26% | 11% | 
| 7 |   Jazz | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 8 |   MP | 7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 
| 9 |   JIPPO | 27 | 59% | 44% | 19% | 
| 10 |   Klubi-04 | 27 | 56% | 33% | 15% | 
| 11 |   JäPS | 27 | 63% | 33% | 15% | 
| 12 |   SJK Akatemia | 27 | 52% | 26% | 7% | 
| 13 |   Tampere United | 7 | 29% | 14% | 0% | 
| 14 |   KäPa | 27 | 67% | 33% | 15% | 
| 15 |   SalPa | 27 | 81% | 52% | 19% | 
| 16 |   OLS | 6 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 
| 17 |   PKKU | 6 | 33% | 17% | 0% | 
| 18 |   Atlantis | 7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 
| 19 |   EPS | 7 | 71% | 0% | 0% | 
| 20 |   Inter Turku II | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 
| 21 |   PK-35 | 27 | 59% | 22% | 15% | 
| 22 |   KuPS Akatemia | 7 | 43% | 29% | 14% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   JJK | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 2 |   RoPS | 6 | 17% | 17% | 0% | 
| 3 |   Lahti | 27 | 74% | 52% | 37% | 
| 4 |   TPS | 27 | 78% | 59% | 26% | 
| 5 |   KPV | 7 | 43% | 14% | 0% | 
| 6 |   EIF | 27 | 74% | 41% | 11% | 
| 7 |   Jazz | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 
| 8 |   MP | 7 | 43% | 29% | 0% | 
| 9 |   JIPPO | 27 | 59% | 33% | 15% | 
| 10 |   Klubi-04 | 27 | 70% | 33% | 15% | 
| 11 |   JäPS | 27 | 41% | 19% | 4% | 
| 12 |   SJK Akatemia | 27 | 63% | 30% | 7% | 
| 13 |   Tampere United | 7 | 57% | 29% | 0% | 
| 14 |   KäPa | 27 | 48% | 22% | 7% | 
| 15 |   SalPa | 27 | 52% | 22% | 7% | 
| 16 |   OLS | 6 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 
| 17 |   PKKU | 6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 
| 18 |   Atlantis | 7 | 29% | 0% | 0% | 
| 19 |   EPS | 7 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 
| 20 |   Inter Turku II | 6 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 
| 21 |   PK-35 | 27 | 59% | 33% | 26% | 
| 22 |   KuPS Akatemia | 7 | 14% | 0% | 0% | 
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of PK-35’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 22% of their games played so far in the Ykkösliiga 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, PK-35’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 59% of their Ykkösliiga matches.
Here are two more card statistics for PK-35 this season in the Finland Ykkösliiga:
You can follow the PK-35’s card situation in Finnish League 2 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.