Football statistics for Orlando City II
Team Info
Season
Country
Stadium
2020
USA
Orlando City Stadium
Competition
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 5 | 33% | 43% | 25% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 9 | 56% | 63% | 50% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 7 | 44% | 38% | 50% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 9 | 56% | 88% | 25% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 8 | 53% | 50% | 57% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 7 | 44% | 25% | 63% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 13 | 87% | 86% | 88% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 10 | 63% | 38% | 88% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 13 | 81% | 100% | 63% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 11 | 73% | 75% | 71% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 10 | 63% | 50% | 75% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 4 | 27% | 43% | 13% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 4 | 25% | 38% | 13% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 5 | 31% | 38% | 25% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 4 | 27% | 25% | 29% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 4 | 25% | 38% | 13% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 3 | 19% | 0% | 38% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 2 | 13% | 29% | 0% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 10 | 67% | 57% | 75% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 7 | 44% | 38% | 50% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 9 | 56% | 63% | 50% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 7 | 44% | 13% | 75% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 7 | 47% | 50% | 43% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 9 | 56% | 75% | 38% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 2 | 13% | 14% | 13% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 6 | 38% | 63% | 13% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 3 | 19% | 0% | 38% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 4 | 27% | 25% | 29% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 6 | 38% | 50% | 25% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 11 | 73% | 57% | 88% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 12 | 75% | 63% | 88% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 11 | 69% | 63% | 75% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 11 | 73% | 75% | 71% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 12 | 75% | 63% | 88% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 13 | 81% | 100% | 63% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 13 | 87% | 71% | 100% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Richmond Kickers |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Orlando City II |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
FC Tucson |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Greenville Triumph |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
Forward Madison |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
North Texas |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 8 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 15 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Inter Miami II |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
Union Omaha |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
New England II |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
Average goals scored and conceded: Orlando City II
Knowing Orlando City II’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the USL League One 2020 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the Orlando City II’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
- 33% of Orlando City II games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Orlando City II and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 67%.
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in USL League One.
All of this information can help determine how Orlando City II’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.