Season
2025
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
14 | 70% |
2 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 67% |
3 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
12 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
12 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
11 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
10 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
10 | 50% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 47% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
9 | 47% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 37% |
20 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 30% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 78% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
5 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
5 | 63% |
9 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 60% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 56% |
11 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
4 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 44% |
18 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 30% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
3 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
2 | 20% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
2 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 63% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Miami FC II |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 45% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
3 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
3 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 33% |
17 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 33% |
18 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
3 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 30% |
21 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 27% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
23 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 22% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
16 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
14 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Loudoun United |
14 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Rhode Island |
14 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
14 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
13 | 61% |
8 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
11 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 55% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 52% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 52% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
10 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Miami FC II |
10 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 45% |
18 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
9 | 45% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 42% |
21 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 36% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
6 | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 81% |
2 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
4 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 44% |
16 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
4 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
3 | 37% |
18 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
3 | 37% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Louisville City |
3 | 30% |
22 |
![]() New Mexico United |
2 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Orange County |
2 | 22% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
6 | 66% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
7 | 63% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
5 | 62% |
12 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 62% |
13 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 60% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 60% |
16 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 54% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
4 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 44% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
4 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
3 | 37% |
22 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 30% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
3 | 30% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which New Mexico United scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether New Mexico United is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, New Mexico United has scored before the opponent in 67% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 33%.
This data helps give a clearer view of New Mexico United’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to New Mexico United being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.