Nei Mongol Zhongyou corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

2020

China

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	82 %	71 %	65 %	41 %	35 %	24 %	18 %	10.18
2	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	87 %	67 %	60 %	40 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	10
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76 %	65 %	59 %	41 %	35 %	24 %	12 %	9.88
4	Suzhou Dongwu	15	67 %	67 %	67 %	53 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	9.86
5	Changchun Yatai	15	67 %	60 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	9.6
6	Kunshan	15	67 %	60 %	47 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	9.47
7	Chengdu Better City FC	15	67 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	9.07
8	Beijing Renhe	17	71 %	47 %	41 %	18 %	18 %	6 %	0 %	9
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	59 %	47 %	35 %	29 %	18 %	18 %	12 %	8.88
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	60 %	60 %	53 %	33 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	8.87
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	15	67 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	8.86
12	Nantong Zhiyun	15	53 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	8.73
13	Shenyang Urban	15	67 %	53 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	7 %	0 %	8.73
14	Beijing BG	15	53 %	47 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	0 %	8.71
15	Meizhou Hakka	15	67 %	40 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	7 %	8.53
16	Taizhou Yuanda	15	47 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.06
17	Hangzhou	15	47 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.33
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	15	60 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	7.27

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Chengdu Better City FC	8	75 %	63 %	50 %	50 %	38 %	38 %	25 %	10.51
2	Xinjiang Tianshan	9	78 %	78 %	78 %	56 %	44 %	22 %	11 %	10.11
3	Changchun Yatai	8	63 %	50 %	50 %	50 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	9.76
4	Beijing BG	8	63 %	50 %	38 %	38 %	38 %	13 %	0 %	9.43
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	8	63 %	38 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	9.38
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	7	71 %	43 %	43 %	43 %	29 %	29 %	0 %	9.29
7	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	7	86 %	71 %	57 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	9.28
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	9	67 %	56 %	44 %	44 %	44 %	22 %	11 %	9.23
9	Nantong Zhiyun	8	63 %	50 %	38 %	25 %	25 %	13 %	13 %	9.13
10	Taizhou Yuanda	8	63 %	25 %	25 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	9
11	Beijing Renhe	8	63 %	50 %	38 %	25 %	25 %	0 %	0 %	8.76
12	Sichuan Jiuniu	7	57 %	57 %	43 %	14 %	14 %	14 %	14 %	8.72
13	Kunshan	7	71 %	57 %	43 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	8.71
14	Suzhou Dongwu	8	63 %	63 %	63 %	38 %	13 %	13 %	0 %	8.63
15	Shenyang Urban	8	38 %	38 %	38 %	38 %	25 %	13 %	0 %	8
16	Hangzhou	7	57 %	57 %	43 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	8
17	Meizhou Hakka	7	71 %	43 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.71
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	7	57 %	29 %	29 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.14

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Suzhou Dongwu	7	71 %	71 %	71 %	71 %	57 %	43 %	29 %	11.29
2	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	8	100 %	88 %	88 %	38 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	11.26
3	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	8	88 %	63 %	63 %	63 %	38 %	13 %	13 %	10.63
4	Kunshan	8	63 %	63 %	50 %	38 %	25 %	13 %	13 %	10.13
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	8	75 %	50 %	38 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	13 %	9.63
6	Shenyang Urban	7	100 %	71 %	43 %	29 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	9.57
7	Changchun Yatai	7	71 %	71 %	43 %	29 %	29 %	29 %	14 %	9.43
8	Meizhou Hakka	8	63 %	38 %	38 %	38 %	38 %	38 %	13 %	9.26
9	Beijing Renhe	9	78 %	44 %	44 %	11 %	11 %	11 %	0 %	9.25
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	63 %	63 %	63 %	50 %	25 %	0 %	0 %	9
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	8	63 %	63 %	50 %	25 %	25 %	13 %	13 %	8.51
12	Jiangxi Liansheng	9	56 %	56 %	44 %	33 %	11 %	11 %	0 %	8.44
13	Nantong Zhiyun	7	43 %	43 %	29 %	29 %	29 %	14 %	14 %	8.28
14	Beijing BG	7	43 %	43 %	29 %	29 %	14 %	14 %	0 %	8
15	Chengdu Better City FC	7	57 %	14 %	14 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.43
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	8	63 %	38 %	25 %	13 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	7.38
17	Taizhou Yuanda	7	29 %	29 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7
18	Hangzhou	8	38 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.75

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Changchun Yatai	15	100%	80%	73%	67%	47%	33%	20%	6.33
3	Suzhou Dongwu	15	87%	73%	67%	53%	47%	33%	20%	5.73
4	Chengdu Better City FC	15	87%	73%	47%	47%	33%	27%	13%	5.4
5	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	88%	65%	53%	35%	29%	18%	18%	5.18
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	15	80%	73%	60%	47%	40%	13%	13%	5.13
7	Beijing BG	15	80%	67%	47%	20%	20%	13%	13%	5
8	Beijing Renhe	17	82%	59%	41%	41%	29%	18%	12%	4.94
9	Kunshan	15	73%	60%	53%	33%	27%	13%	13%	4.8
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	80%	60%	47%	27%	20%	20%	20%	4.6
11	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	88%	71%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.59
12	Meizhou Hakka	15	73%	67%	47%	40%	27%	0%	0%	4.53
13	Guizhou Zhicheng	15	73%	60%	40%	33%	7%	0%	0%	4
14	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	67%	53%	27%	27%	27%	13%	7%	3.93
15	Nantong Zhiyun	15	73%	33%	27%	20%	13%	7%	7%	3.73
16	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	35%	24%	24%	18%	18%	18%	12%	3.35
17	Hangzhou	15	60%	47%	13%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.2
18	Shenyang Urban	15	60%	40%	33%	13%	0%	0%	0%	3.13
19	Taizhou Yuanda	15	67%	33%	20%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.13

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing BG	8	88%	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	25%	6.57
3	Changchun Yatai	8	100%	75%	75%	75%	50%	38%	13%	6.38
4	Shaanxi Chang'an	7	86%	86%	71%	57%	57%	29%	29%	6.29
5	Suzhou Dongwu	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	63%	50%	25%	6.13
6	Chengdu Better City FC	8	88%	88%	50%	50%	38%	38%	13%	5.88
7	Xinjiang Tianshan	9	78%	78%	56%	44%	22%	22%	22%	5
8	Meizhou Hakka	7	71%	71%	57%	43%	29%	0%	0%	4.71
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	9	89%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11%	11%	4.56
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	7	86%	71%	43%	14%	14%	14%	14%	4.43
11	Jiangxi Liansheng	8	38%	38%	38%	38%	38%	38%	25%	4.38
12	Kunshan	7	57%	57%	57%	29%	29%	0%	0%	4.14
13	Beijing Renhe	8	75%	50%	25%	25%	25%	13%	13%	4.13
14	Hangzhou	7	71%	57%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	4
15	Guizhou Zhicheng	7	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	4
16	Nantong Zhiyun	8	75%	25%	25%	13%	13%	13%	13%	3.88
17	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	7	57%	57%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	3.71
18	Shenyang Urban	8	63%	50%	38%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
19	Taizhou Yuanda	8	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.75

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Changchun Yatai	7	100%	86%	71%	57%	43%	29%	29%	6.29
3	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	8	88%	63%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	5.88
4	Beijing Renhe	9	89%	67%	56%	56%	33%	22%	11%	5.75
5	Kunshan	8	88%	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	5.38
6	Suzhou Dongwu	7	86%	71%	71%	43%	29%	14%	14%	5.29
7	Chengdu Better City FC	7	86%	57%	43%	43%	29%	14%	14%	4.86
8	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	75%	50%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	4.75
9	Meizhou Hakka	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	0%	0%	4.38
10	Xinjiang Tianshan	8	100%	63%	25%	13%	13%	0%	0%	4.13
11	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	8	75%	50%	25%	25%	25%	13%	0%	4.13
12	Shaanxi Chang'an	8	75%	63%	50%	38%	25%	0%	0%	4.13
13	Guizhou Zhicheng	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	0%	0%	0%	4
14	Nantong Zhiyun	7	71%	43%	29%	29%	14%	0%	0%	3.57
15	Taizhou Yuanda	7	86%	29%	29%	29%	0%	0%	0%	3.57
16	Beijing BG	7	71%	57%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.43
17	Shenyang Urban	7	57%	29%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
18	Hangzhou	8	50%	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
19	Jiangxi Liansheng	9	33%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.44

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	87%	73%	67%	60%	53%	47%	27%	6.07
3	Shenyang Urban	15	87%	87%	67%	53%	47%	20%	20%	5.6
4	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	88%	88%	53%	53%	35%	24%	18%	5.53
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	94%	71%	53%	29%	24%	18%	18%	5.29
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	76%	65%	59%	53%	41%	12%	6%	5
7	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80%	67%	47%	40%	33%	20%	20%	5
8	Taizhou Yuanda	15	87%	67%	33%	27%	27%	20%	13%	4.93
9	Kunshan	15	93%	60%	53%	40%	13%	7%	0%	4.67
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	87%	53%	40%	20%	13%	7%	7%	4.27
11	Hangzhou	15	73%	53%	53%	40%	7%	0%	0%	4.13
12	Suzhou Dongwu	15	60%	33%	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	4.13
13	Beijing Renhe	17	71%	47%	35%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.06
14	Meizhou Hakka	15	60%	53%	47%	27%	20%	7%	0%	4
15	Shaanxi Chang'an	15	60%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	13%	3.73
16	Beijing BG	15	67%	47%	20%	13%	7%	7%	7%	3.71
17	Chengdu Better City FC	15	67%	53%	20%	13%	13%	13%	7%	3.67
18	Changchun Yatai	15	53%	40%	27%	13%	13%	7%	7%	3.27
19	Guizhou Zhicheng	15	60%	40%	33%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.27

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Taizhou Yuanda	8	100%	100%	50%	38%	38%	25%	25%	6.25
3	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	7	86%	71%	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	5.57
4	Nantong Zhiyun	8	88%	75%	50%	50%	38%	13%	13%	5.25
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	9	89%	56%	44%	22%	22%	22%	22%	5.11
6	Jiangxi Liansheng	8	88%	88%	50%	50%	25%	13%	13%	5
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	9	67%	67%	56%	44%	33%	11%	11%	4.67
8	Beijing Renhe	8	88%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.63
9	Chengdu Better City FC	8	88%	63%	38%	25%	25%	25%	13%	4.63
10	Kunshan	7	86%	57%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	4.57
11	Shenyang Urban	8	75%	75%	50%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.5
12	Sichuan Jiuniu	7	86%	57%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	4.29
13	Hangzhou	7	71%	43%	43%	43%	0%	0%	0%	4
14	Changchun Yatai	8	63%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.38
15	Guizhou Zhicheng	7	71%	29%	29%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3.14
16	Meizhou Hakka	7	43%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	0%	3
17	Shaanxi Chang'an	7	71%	14%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3
18	Beijing BG	8	50%	25%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.86
19	Suzhou Dongwu	8	63%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenyang Urban	7	100%	100%	86%	71%	71%	29%	29%	6.86
3	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	63%	63%	38%	6.5
4	Jiangxi Liansheng	9	89%	89%	56%	56%	44%	33%	22%	6
5	Suzhou Dongwu	7	57%	57%	43%	43%	43%	43%	43%	6
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	8	100%	88%	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	5.5
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	8	88%	63%	63%	63%	50%	13%	0%	5.38
8	Meizhou Hakka	8	75%	75%	63%	38%	25%	13%	0%	4.88
9	Kunshan	8	100%	63%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	4.75
10	Nantong Zhiyun	7	71%	57%	43%	29%	29%	29%	29%	4.71
11	Beijing BG	7	86%	71%	29%	29%	14%	14%	14%	4.57
12	Shaanxi Chang'an	8	50%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	25%	4.38
13	Hangzhou	8	75%	63%	63%	38%	13%	0%	0%	4.25
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	88%	50%	38%	13%	13%	13%	13%	4.25
15	Beijing Renhe	9	56%	56%	33%	22%	11%	0%	0%	3.5
16	Taizhou Yuanda	7	71%	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	0%	3.43
17	Guizhou Zhicheng	8	50%	50%	38%	25%	13%	0%	0%	3.38
18	Changchun Yatai	7	43%	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	3.14
19	Chengdu Better City FC	7	43%	43%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.57

Nei Mongol Zhongyou corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Nei Mongol Zhongyou’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the China League 1:

Nei Mongol Zhongyou games have an average of 10 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
60% of Nei Mongol Zhongyou’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Nei Mongol Zhongyou has an average of 3.93 corners won per game this season.
On 27% of occasions, Nei Mongol Zhongyou had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Nei Mongol Zhongyou usually concedes an average of 6.07 corners per match.

You can also check out Nei Mongol Zhongyou’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.